Satellites Are Impossible
Satellites don't exist. All transmissions we receive are made possible by triangulating ground towers and dishes.
Satellites are purely science-fiction. All supposed images of satellites in orbit show fake CGI "satellites" orbiting a fake CGI "ball-Earth." First conceived by Freemason science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke in 1945, they claim satellites became science-fact soon after. This is impossible for many reasons outlined in the following video, however, including the fact the melting points of the metals used in satellites are far lower than the temperature in the "thermosphere" where satellites supposedly are. Satellites, space stations, the Hubble telescope and space travel in general are absolutely the biggest hoaxes of the century, and NASA the most successful propaganda organization in history.
27 comments
You don't exist. You're an arch zionist Freemason hoax, a hologram programed to go on the Internet and spread misinformation so the filthy commies can paint the moon pink with a big Lenin face on it.
Don't you laugh at me, I know a spell that'll make you show your true form.
Satellites don't exist. All transmissions we receive are made possible by triangulating ground towers and dishes.
Explain then how GPS works in areas where there are no such towers and dishes around for hundreds or even thousands of miles?
I'm an amateur astronomer and I have SEEN satellites, both with and without my telescopes. One can even program modern computerized telescopes to follow satellites across the sky as they go over, while simultaneously observing them in the eyepiece.
I suppose you claim the Shuttle and the Space Station are fake, too? I have also seen both of these with my own eyes. Right where they were predicted to be by their orbital parameters.
Here's a couple of questions for you: Why, exactly, does NASA need to fake all of these things? What do they have to gain by doing this? And where's your evidence they are actually faking all of this?
Ok, then please explain for me how, with a store bought (or even homemade, if you have the time, parts, and inclination) telescope, you can SEE satellites and the International Space Station? Is NASA somehow projecting images that bounce off an empty portion of the atmosphere? Are they going around planting post-hypnotic suggestions telling people they see these things? Are they projecting things onto people's telescopes?
I rather doubt you have answers for any of these. Put the bong down.
Then please explain how I am able to receive weather satellites on my scanner and demodulate the signals on my computer, giving me a picture of the earth from high above it?
And I'm guessing you're promoting flat earth theory here? You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you?
A.C. Clarke conceived the idea of communications satellites as being something practically useful we might want to (and be able to) actually build. but satellites in general, as a concept of something man made and put into earth orbit, was first conceived by Isaac Newton AFAIK. of course, he was speaking in terms of a gedankenexperiment to illustrate gravity and orbits, but still.
The thermosphere contains such a diffuse atmosphere at that altitude that, no matter how hot it is (molecules moving rapidly) ,there are very FEW of those molecules, and they're not going to melt metal. Is that simple and non-technical enough for you? I'm not going to watch your video to look for more "proof you're not a physicist". My curiosity has been pretty well satisfied on that score.
"All supposed images of satellites in orbit show fake CGI "satellites" orbiting a fake CGI "ball-Earth.""
Oh goody, a flat-earther. So I see your brain has some space to rent. Some, as in, all of it.
You can use a telescope to track them, this isn't that hard. Seriously, go to walmart, buy the $40 dollar model, get on an amateur astronomy site to see what'll be overhead, go nuts.
You just sound so stupid.
@Pip
Actually... yes, if you're judging heat by the energy of atoms rather than what it feels like. And given our relative (in astronomical terms) proximity to a star, the space here is warmer than normal. But, temperature in space is a slightly different beast than temperature in atmosphere.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
