So much for 'Charismatic' churches, then. As proved by Pasty Jane Womanning's second quote there.
The only thing 'coming out' is your own denial that you're still in that closet of yours, if certain people whose legal actions in private that don't personally affect anyone, least of all your non-existent 'God' affect you.
...oh, and all it'd take is independent tests by a laboratory to do analysis of samples of Starbucks' products to completely annihilate your argument based on your completely unfounded allegations (and thus further destroy your public image; if you had one in the first place!).
But that's what it's been about all along: Science making fools out of you, and making you look utter twats.
...which is what you should've been: a red stain coming out of your mother's, when she'd had her period, one of those unfertilised zygotes.
Honestly, fundies such as you lot are a disease worse than Ebola. Fundieism is the main symptom of that disease, that's for sure: Insanity.
Oh, and one thing: I drink Tea. And have never been in a Starbucks in my life. So there's your 'theory' fucked right from the start.
[/(*Pre-emptive strike mode on*)]
Moral: For a certain person who shall remain equally clueless, if you think that being 'controversial' like this is supposed to make 'a point', the only 'point' you & your insane ilk - as demonstrated here - are making, is that one should stay away from you inferior subhumans, lest one becomes infected by the vile disease that is Fundieism. P.R.-wise, she's doing your religion no favours, indeed, is aiding in the acceleration of it's demise.
This is why your past 'Paradigm' is dying. And Pasty Jane Womanning is clearly clutching at straw dust, in their desperation to be heard, being the Attention whores she - and you - clearly are.
Remember: my Christian friend would never think of behaving in this unjustifiable way (as he wouldn't on the internet). Why should he? You tell me.
@Swede
"You have evidence for this, of course?"
Somehow, I doubt 'It was just a joke!' would be a credible defence at Pasty Jane's trial for libel/slander. And - as Starbucks is international - what's to stop them from taking this to the High Court here in the UK? Our libel & slander laws are so ultra-brutal & hyper-savage, that Pasty Jane would be begging for a ten trillion-year holiday in Hell from just ten minutes of what our lawyers/QCs are capable of; and I doubt Pasty Jane here could scrape up enough money to hire a good defence lawyer, and these cases in my country can run for years, and be utter money black holes, never mind 'pits'; with unimaginably huge costs/fees bills even when the defendant loses.