“My last topic was about the big bang, but evolution always comes up in the conversation. They go hand in hand.”
Only from a certain viewpoint of ignorance and presupposition.
“Many Christians buy into this lie.”
Maybe because the evidence is convincing?
“It gives the atheist and Christian common ground.”
Kinda like electricity and computers? The water cycle? Biology? Stuff that’s true because of science, not revelation? Huh. And also agnostics and Muslims and Jews and Buddhists and so on…
“But I feel that this border line heresy.”
You don’t understand the science, but you call it heresy because they don’t read the first chapter as literally as you do.
And you can demonstrate that it wasn’t meant as a parable or poetic metaphor…?
“ But the point is the bible is quiet clear on the order of events and the circumstances covering their and our creation.”
Yes. But that doesn’t make the evidence go away.
“I see no proof of macro evolution, one kind changing into another kind.”
You use ‘kind.’ Of course you’re not goint to accept the evidence or arguments for macroevolution.
"And to say that micro leads to macro is completely unsupported in the fossil records.”
Are you a paleobiologist?
If not, it doesn’t matter a fuck that you don’t know where the evidence is to be found, does it?
“It is not science, science is where we show something to be true by observing and testing then reproducing the results in a controlled environment.”
Nope. You misunderstand the definition of science.
The observations are what’s supposed to be repeatable, not the event we’re trying to understand.
If science has this burden, then CSI would have to prove a murder by committing another murder in the same conditions, with the same weapon, producing the same evidence.
"Bacteria is always thrown out there as proof, but bacteria stays bacteria, virus's stay virus's, dogs stay dogs, etc. etc.”
Bacteria is always used to show evidence of evolution, which doesn’t mean what you think it means.
You’re just batting a thousand on NOT knowing what you’re talking about.
"There are different types in the kinds , but there kinds never completely change to a different kind.”
Feel free to show the upper limit of DNA changes allowed in any gene pool. What acts as a governor to change?
“The evidence is no where to be seen.”
Certainly not of your understanding of evolution, or your claims.
“The bible doesn't teach this.”
Doesn’t matter a fuck.
“And this in itself is a belief system requiring faith.”
Or knowledge. Actual educational input rather than faith-based judging.
“So if you have proof, solid proof, then please present it here.”
No one has proof. Proof is for math and ‘Law and Order.’
We have evidence. You discount it, as you don’t understand what it’s even trying to show.
So, no, do your own homework or forever look stupid.
