bobx #fundie

bobx #fundie bobstruth.blogspot.com

[Previus poster said: "My family has a history of schizophrenia. While I was lucky enough to avoid inheriting the disorder, I still carry the genes. I cannot have a baby because I do not wish to pass on the disorder. Would you consider it beneficial for women like me to pass on things like this to their children?"]

Bob replied:

For you, suicide is perhaps the best option. A fat sow with mental problems is no benefit to anyone.

94 comments

old comment by Tired of this crap

Bob hasn't read her comment properly. She said she "was lucky enough to avoid inheriting the disorder" and then he says "A fat sow with mental problems is no benefit to anyone"
Pity his website has no mail address for me to help him fact check his responses.
Oh and I noticed that he can't seem to think of any insult rather than "fat sow" and "Pound sand bitch!", which he doesn't even alternate.
He also has a pretty silly habit to jump to conclusions.
I also notices that he only answered some of the comments and ignored the most valid arguments.
Still he's just an idiot, not really a fundie.

EDIT: I just posted a really long post to him and I hope he responds. Here's a copy:

"Come on Bob. You're jumping to conclusions here aren't you.
Oh and you didn't read one of the comments correctly (or you answered incorrectly).

She said she "was lucky enough to avoid inheriting the disorder" and then you say "A fat sow with mental problems is no benefit to anyone"

Either you misread her comment, or you meant her children would be worthless. Regardless you point of view isn't not very kind. The lady was clearly asking for advice and you gave her hate.

Constructive criticism is more useful than hate.

If you notice this entire comment gives you advice and it doesn't insult you.

Oh and before you say so. I am a guy, and a teenager, and I can grantee that women aren't trying for babies.

Bob. Suicide is NEVER the answer for ANYONE. particularly with an issue that isn't their fault.

OH and the girls actions can easily be interpreted in any matter of ways. i,e':
she is a lesbian and wishes to hide it by having a kid (just as proven as your idea),
she was raped (may as well throw that one in since your overgeneralizing everything.),
she had sex for the fun of it and the baby was the unknown but welcome result (it's what most girls I know do, though they talke the abortion route due tothe fact that unlike this girl they don't have economic stability).

Just because the girl has a house doesn't mean she wants kids. Most likely it is a move for stability in her life.

And you cannot blame feminists for all the problems in society. They may help, but they are by no means a main part of it, and anyway our world is already over populated, what does it matter if there are less offspring. If anything it will help our poor planet.

It is best of people hold off having kids until after they have gained economic stability and have a stable household, this just happens to occur after the person is over 20. It has little to do with feminists.

I'd like to see your response to my comment, But please keep the insults to a minimum and simply provide a constructive intelligent debate as I'm trying to do."

old comment by

Bob is probably an "agent provocateur". The main difference between they and the usual poes is that the former believe, at least partially, what they write, although NOT COMPLETELY. They post deliberately provocative and irritating posts to provoke people, not because they agree 100% with what they say.
They're the product of internet(which guarantees anonymity)and economic boom(which guarantees them nobody take them seriously, unlike societies in crisis). He's more or less like Jean Marie Lepen in France.He says all that nonsense because he knows that he is not actually going to win elections, in the same way that Bob knows that only a bunch of crackpots actually agree with him(and Fred Phelps, for example).
They think that, that way, they have, like Hannah Montana, the best of both worlds. On one side, they can say provocative bigoted nonsenses that not even the most radicals believe and think themselves special because they don't "submit to the lies of the PC". On the other side, they don't have to take responsabilities for what they say or do.

old comment by Edwardo, the patron saint of douche-baggery

Woah... Have NONE (or at least the vast majority) of you looked at the sight. The guy isn't necessarily a Christian. However, he is just a complete asshole. There really isn't much to do here with religion, so shame on you, Princess Rot for not catching that when you posted this, and shame on the rest of the FSTDT community who didn't notice it and pride themselves on being observant and intelligent atheist/ agnostics/ or very open minded religious followers. On a different note, thanks to the guy a few posts above me with no name (#486254). In a twist of literary genius, he affirms his assertion about deliberately irritating posts by citing both Jean Marie Lepen AND Hannah Montana in the same argument. I laughed, and hoped this was intentional. @Bob- Whether you mean what you say or not, you are still an asshole.

old comment by Tired of this crap

BOB ANSWERED MY POST

"Note to nick:
You’re young and missed the point of the previous facetious reader’s comment. When you grow up and become more experienced you will be able to discern the difference between her misandrist feminist rhetoric and a real question.

The advice from a teenage boy who has been fed leftist feminist dogma for all his life is insulting rather than useful. Its been said (as humor) that we should let children rule the world while they still know it all.

As for your “guarantee,” its more teenage nonsense. Millions of young females like Jamie Lynn Spears are making babies without being allowed to have decent families to raise them in. Bastard children are now the majority of children in some US states. Time to wake up and open your eyes. Remove the blinders of the crap the leftist feminist schools are feeding you every day. "

SO I ANSWERED HIS ANSWER.

"Bob I have a few views and observations to your answer.

1. If it was a rhetorical question why did you answer it in way that insulted her, instead of constructive criticism?

2. I have not been fed "leftist feminist dogma." The only reason I am opposing your points of view is that I see you jumping to conclusions and writing in a style that is informal and possibly insulting. My main concern about your style is not your points but your way of discussing them. If you wish to provide concise information about a topic, a formal language that points out facts and conclusions is best to allow others to understand your point of view.

3.I agree that children and teens don't know everything, we may ace other subjects to you but you'll always have the age advantage over us, but then you must ask yourself, doesn't an 80 year old have more knowledge and wisdom than yourself. Maybe they should run the country, but then they suffer from dementia and other problems and their views are seen as old and outdated. Bob, what is the perfect age where your views aren't out dated?

4. Why did you call my advice insulting? I didn't say anything bad, or are discriminating against me because of my age?

5. True. I cannot guarantee it. It was wrong for me to use my own personal experience of the issue to argue a point. I'm sorry for that.

6. "without being allowed to have decent families to raise them in" Really? In what way are the stopped? I am honestly interested and may agree with your point with evidence.

7. "Bastard children are now the majority of children in some US states". Bastard children are kids born out of wedlock, not children born when the parents are young. (oh and I'd love the link to that information, I keep on forgetting to site my sources as well)

8. "Remove the blinders of the crap the leftist feminist schools are feeding you every day" Thankfully I don't go to American schools. (well from what your telling me I should be thankful for that). I am understanding individual. I always consider both sides of any thing I view and make my judgments on which side of the argument is the 'correct' side. Often I find that both sides have positives and negatives, and so must form my own conclusions. I have probably been fed crap in school, but I am a smart individual who knows what to learn and what to forget.

I am NOT pro-feminist, I simple consider both sides and choose the middle ground as it is often the most level (and 'correct') view. Unfortunately your post seems a bit rightist.

Anyway. i am enjoying this discussion and hope to continue."

I must have no life If I'm going to keep this up. Arguing without asking about his ideas is kinda annoying.

old comment by Bob

LOL. The younger generation hasn’t even thought up any new insults. Those old tired feminist hate crap insults were listed and published when your grandmothers tried to use them to silence men. They haven’t been worth your time reciting for decades.

-----------------------------------

Feminist definition: "Mental Problems" --> adj. 1. A man who consistently supports equal legal rights while opposing feminist domination. 2. Someone winning a debate with a feminist. 3. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism.
Usually used as an ad-hominem attack
Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it."

Synonyms: sick, terribly confused, defective brain,
take the IQ-test, morons, taking meds, nuts,
seek professional help, fucked in the head
had one too many hits of crack, needs therapy,
psycho, off, etc.

----------------------------------

Feminist definition: "Hates women" --> n. 1. A man who doesn't support the feminist war on men. 2. Someone winning a debate with a feminist. 3. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. Usually used as an ad-hominem attack.. See "misogynist."

bobx #fundie bobstruth.blogspot.com

94 comments

Confused?