But seriously, I really like this idea. It is like a big sign that tells us who the worse sinners are. Africans have the highest percentage of AIDS. They must generally be horrible sinners! Makes you wonder why God even made them.
27 comments
The Bible claims that Jesus said the smallest sin is equal to the biggest sin, therefore, your bigotry, not to mention your sinful lack of logic, make you the equal of a serial killer. Makes me wonder why "God" made you.
Fundy logic. Could it be that they have the highest rate of AIDS because IT´S WHERE THE VIRUS ORIGINATED, IDIOT?, and have less medical resources?. By the way, in NOrth Africa, AKA muslims, have a very low rate, does it mean that they are beloved by God?
Actually, sexual practices in Africa are not measurable different from the West and even trend to a more prudish expression than the West in general.
Aside from that, there are good reasons
to question the prevailing ethos surrounding the HIV=AIDS hypotheosis, which has becomed the mainstream view of AIDS for better or worse over the past 20+ years.
The glaring racism and idiotic interpretation of disease has been covered, but HeWillReturn is also ignorant of his bible. He wonders why God would make sinners? Well, that question isn't limited to his imagined Africans. All of humanity is, in God's words, destined to sin and fail to meet His standards. Even Israel, the nation that is referred to as His wife is called a great whore because she continuously fails to heed his word by again and again sucking the cock of the Jew's own ideas or that of their neighbors rather than following God's plan. For example, the exchange:
___God: You will have a humble King, not above the those he rules or above myself.
___Mrs. God: But I want a King like my neighbors have, a powerful and impressive heavy-handed ruler.
___God: Whore!
or
___God: Don't fuck around with other gods.
___Mrs. God: Ok... Ooh, Baal!
___God: Whore!
Seriously, if Mr. Return can't imagine why God would create sinners, he's got a far greater problem on his hands than he realizes.
g-21-lto: You may be right about that being sarcasm; but if so, it's poorly presented as such. I read the whole post, but read the term "argument" as referring to the whole discussion, not merely to that particular approach to it that he'd just used. It seemed so perfectly consistent with the rest of the conversation that that final sentence just struck me as a slighly odd comment on the discussion, not a disavowal of the content in the foregoing paragraphs. Sarcasm tags, or even quotation marks, would have been a big help here.
~David D.G.
I'm a troll, I'm a troll!
Fol-de-roll, fol-de-roll!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.