[Our bodies weren't designed for it [skiing], thus its a sin. Right? You essentially just said...we would have been born with skis on our feet if we were meant to ski (to the agony of our mothers).]
No, what I said in this, rediculous conversation, was 1.Men and women oviousley were designed to interact sexually together. and 2. If a woman was born with skis, and I chose to go skiing on the back of a man, then it would be a sin. Look I don't care if anyone wants to be a homosexuall, I just don't want them to go to hell. It is amazing what lengths people will go to to justify their sin.
45 comments
"If a woman was born with skis, and I chose to go skiing on the back of a man..."
So... women are born with skis, and men are born with... snow on their backs? How does this mean a man skiing on another man is a sin? Is it because he'd have to strap on skis? Is this really an analogy for how the use of strap-ons is a sin? I'm confused.
You lost me with number 2, mate.
Of course, after re-reading the post, I realize that you were lost when you wrote it.
"1.Men and women oviousley were designed to interact sexually together."
Exactly how is that obvious? Both genders have openings and protrusions which seem to be satisfactory for sexual encounters. Depending on one's sexual orientation, one may find the equipment of one gender more interesting than the other, but that is an individual feeling.
"2. If a woman was born with skis, and I chose to go skiing on the back of a man, then it would be a sin."
Huh? If a woman were born with skis, her mother would die and she wouldn't have to buy her first pair of skis.
I never have and never will choose to go skiing on anyone's back. No scriptures from any of the religions I'm familiar with specifically address skiing on another human being.
"It is amazing what lengths people will go to to justify their sin."
It is amazing what lengths people will go to to justify their bigotry.
If God had intended sex to be wholey for reproduction, it would have a 100% success rate when no actions were taken to inhibit consception. So, obviously, God wanted us to have fun with it. What's wrong with a little mutual masturbation or assfucking?
If a woman was born with skis, and I chose to go skiing on the back of a man, then it would be a sin.
???!????!!!!!!!!!!!!
It´s ridiculous to justify other´s people sins as well, and don´t be so pompous as to believe that "I don´t want them to go to hell". 1.If homosexuall people are born so or it is acquired(THOUGH NOT DELIBERATELY CHOSEN, THAT´S THE POINT)is out of question. What you can´t do is PUTTING HOMOSEXUALITY AT THE SAME HEIGHT AND CATEGORY AS SAY MURDER, FOR EXAMPLE.
Well, silly me. I thought tandem skiing was perfectly legal. There goes my ski trip.
Thanks, asshole.
But at least there's skiing in hell. It'l be pretty rough having to constantly replace all that melting snow, but hey, that's the Debbil's problem
Look I don't care if anyone wants to be a homosexuall, I just don't want them to go to hell.
Yeah, right. That's why you're so outspoken and opposed, you want to save them from Hell. Sure.
1.Men and women oviousley were designed to interact sexually together. and
Men and Women have the right parts to interact sexually. True.
So do two women, two men, two men and a woman, two women and a man, three women... You just need to use your imagination more or look at more porn.
Perhaps you meant sexually reproduce?
2. If a woman was born with skis, and I chose to go skiing on the back of a man, then it would be a sin.
This is the stupidest thing I've heard today, and that's saying a lot. It also sounds dangerous!
Look I don't care if anyone wants to be a homosexuall, I just don't want them to go to hell.
Bullshit. You could give a crap if homosexuals go to hell. If this is really your motivation, my advice is to worry about your own soul and leave everyone else alone. Otherwise, I would caution you that telling a lie is also a sin.
It is amazing what lengths people will go to to justify their sin.
It is amazing to what lengths people will go to justify their religious worldview. Your ski analogy is a good example.
The point is; people don't want to be homosexuals, they just are. Just as you did not decide what gender you were born as, you don't get to decide what sexual orientation you were born with.
Skiing on the back of a man is a sin? Who are you to call the conversation rediculous[sic]?
If a woman was born with skis how would you be the one skiing on her? If you're a man you've got it back to front, and if you're a woman you're gay - burn in hell forever!!
You said it - this is a rediculous (sic) conversation.
There is my big invisible friend, and he dislikes what you're doing, and I don't really care, but I don't want him to beat you, so you should stop. I'm just warning you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.