"I understand DNA very well, but it seems that most of you do not. If anyone knew the complexity of a single strand of DNA, you would know it would be impossible for it to spontaneously combust from gases."
Spontaneously combust? From gases?
What the hell are you talking about?
"For those of you who do not know the complexity of it, let me tell you. You would have a better chance of throwing paint in the air and it falling to the ground to paint an exact "Mona Lisa" painting, Now multiply that by 100."
Well, at least it's more creative than the typical "1,000 monkeys typing Shakespeare" example you guys typically go with when trying to show that DNA couldn't have come about naturally. It's still fucking wrong on several levels, but you're showing some inspiration at least.
"It would be as though you remove all the letters from all the books in the U.S. Library of Congress, jumble them, and randomly place the letters back, creating an exact match."
Except that's not anywhere near what the evolution of DNA looked like. A better example would be to take all of the letters, jumble them up, and randomly place them together. Now, keep anything that is an actual word and jumble the rest of the letters again. Keep any further words. Repeat until you have no more letters. Now assemble the words into sentences (i.e., strands of functioning DNA).
"But hey, it took billions of years right? So hey, just use your imagination."
Yes. It did take billions of years. It also was working with a set of rules (i.e., anything that didn't function or actually killed the creature was thrown out, among others), so it's really not as amazing as you make it sound with your stawmen examples.
