[Seemingly trying to falsify plate tectonics]
In a rock formation, layers are said to build when new sediment forms on top of an already existing layer. As a result, the higher up the layer, the younger the sediment.
What you describes reverses the supposed age of layers. Already existing layers are replaced as new layers push up under it.
New layers......form under older ones.
From a logical standpoint, what you describe falsifies geologic rock ages.
24 comments
Unless floods have the ability to dig up millennia old layers of rock- dozens to hundreds of feet beneath the surface- and spread them over the current layer of bedrock and topsoil, I don't see how your claim is either simple or logical.
"New layers......form under older ones"
"New layers......form under older ones."
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
This could happen, as when magma flows out of a volcano, covering up older layers, but otherwise, your head is up your ass.
You display total ignorance of Geology. Sedimentary rocks are laid upon existing rocks. Extrusive igneous rocks are laid on top of existing rocks. Intrusive igneous rocks are injected under pressure into existing rocks.
The flatness and fine sedimentation of layered sedimentary rocks proves that such rocks were laid down over a very long period. I could go on and on, but it would be useless to someone with zero scientific knowledge.
He's either ignorant himself or depending on others ignorance, as tectonics push the areas up (and this only occurs someplaces, others are being crushed under or broken sideways.) they aren't building new mantle under 10 feet of surface or even 40, except at the very edge of the event, recognizable by it rubbly area.
Simpler, it's the usual Christian stunt of researching till they find an anomaly that suits their agenda then suggesting this is the state of all land mass. Whereas people who study this can show you charts where the conditions are different less than half a mile horizontally away.
shinbits should go to Iceland and prove these new mantles to us, I'll donate a pick axe.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
