She was leading an immoral and unhealthy life, obviously, but she was still right that "working" with a gay male "porn star" put her at even greater risk. Homosexuals today want to stamp out criticism of their perversion. That's what this is about, what the gay wedding cake case is about, and what the removing the ban on blood donations by gay men is about. Well, tough. Sodomy is not normal or healthy.
9 comments
"She was leading an immoral and unhealthy life..."
Much better opening sentence for a novel than, "It was a dark and stormy night". Too bad it went right downhill from there.
There's no such thing as a gay wedding cake, any more than there can be a sensual wedding cake!
There are people doing sex work or adult entertainment who should not be there. Possibly she was one of them, but her mental health problems might be unrelated, I don't know. That being said, I support the right for anyone who enjoys it to engage in such work.
For that matter, there are a lot of people in "regular" jobs which they shouldn't be in, because it's a physical and/or mental hazard to them, or their incompetence makes them a hazard to others. But with the anything-to-survive economic conditions some people find themselves in, you can hardly blame them.
Also, I'm amused by the (likely unintentional) implication that gay men having sex with women is somehow a normal thing in porn. I mean, is straight-for-pay really that common?
"...stamp out criticism..."?
Does the waiter tell you not to order the dessert because you're too fat? Does the hardware store refuse to sell you sharp objects because you look too clumsy to use them safely? Does the card shop insist you buy a mushy, sentimental Mother's Day card instead of the funny one that you know Mom would prefer? Does the clothing story refuse to sell you that jacket because they think you'll look awful in that color?
There's a line that the bakery crossed. It's not their business to approve or disapprove in any way.
Homosexuals today want to stamp out criticism of their perversion
Well, between Obergefell vs. Hodges and what's just happened to the Religious Reich's moral 'agenda' as a whole barely 48 hours ago, someone's criticism of that criticism has just been worse than crushed under the heel of Political Correctness .
Homosexual sex is normal and healthy. Lawrence vs. Texas & a certain 26th June SCOTUS decision - as well as Romans 13:1-5 - says so. You don't like that? Well, tough.
Is paedophilia normal or 'healthy'? Because your support for Roy Less has already answered that question for us, o paedo enablers of the Alt-Shite & Religious Reich.
And that is precisely why your 'moral' agenda is utterly destroyed. What happened with Josh Buggar should have been a warning to you.
Guess who also supported Roy Less ...!
That's what this is about, what the gay wedding cake case is about
It couldn't be just that some gay people wanted a damn wedding cake?
Also, interesting how they put that...."normal and healthy." Kinda implies that being "normal" is just as important or maybe more so than being healthy, doesn't it?
Obviously August Ames had her issues, this wouldn't have happened if she didn't. And it's a tragedy, and I say that out of genuine sympathy, not to use her death as a weapon.
Oral sex (a form of sodomy) is not normal or healthy - plenty of straight men would disagree!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
