"You know what I give up."
No, what do you give up?
"Not because I'm losing but because."
I'm sorry, but that's not a sentence.
"What have I won If I explained something to a foolish man. He's still foolish."
I think you should be careful who you are calling foolish as you seem unable to write and punctuate a reasonable sentence.
"I"m not going to play the circle game all day with someone who seams to just want to but heads."
Good. With that time you save you can take an adult school english class. Maybe you'll have some time to read a book other than the Bible.
"Perhaps if you stopped reading things in a biased angle you wouldn't be were you are now."
Using one's capability to reason is not "a biased angle," dipshit. Also, I am relatively pleased with where I am now.
"twin nested hierarchy is a pretty funny concept too."
"Well since we all share smiliar traits we must have all came from a common Ancestor aka the single celled organism."
Yes, that seems the most likely and best supported theory.
"In reality we should be amazed that God can create and did create so many life forms with similiarities."
Reality and God have so little in common.
God is an imaginary being, therefore, he didn't create anything.
"To believe we came from an A sexual single celled organism to a organism with reproductive organs for mating is in it's self stupid."
Mighty bold words for someone so obviously mentally challenged.
"Then carring that idea to a fish and plant and later to a creature on land that grew legs. Fish in the sea today still don't have legs as far as we can remember, and last time I check they didn't want to walk on land. But the fairy tale sounds fun to believe. Have a pet fish? Go ahead and throw it out of its fish bow and tell it to walk and breath. Evolution will grab ahold of it right and for survival it will walk."
I would suggest that you read some books on the ToE, but, they are probably beyond your ability to understand. Suffice it to say, evolution doesn't work like that.
Ah, there it is, the undeniable sign of an internet idiot.
"Dummiest theories of the world today lay in science. Science can have all the angles it wants to lie. Yes I said lie because the only way out of a lie is the truth. And no self pride loving scientist is going to back down."
Examining all the "angles" is a good thing, cp. Without examining other angles, you just assume that the Bible is true.
Scientist DO back down from positions that are shown to be incorrect, however, simply disagreeing with the Bible is not evidence of being incorrect.
"They'll simple create more oopsie to back old oopsie. Its just that simple."
That is just untrue. Peer review largely prevents an incorrect theory from becoming accepted. Even so, if errors are later found, science allows for correction, unlike religious dogma which requires believer's support no matter how ridiculous it's asertions.
P.S. Your writing is truly terrible.