Andy Schlafly & Karajou #fundie

Andy Schlafly & Karajou #fundie conservapedia.com

["Neutral means 0% conservative bias and 0% liberal bias. It's not a compromise, it's complete neutrality."]

Karajou: It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen.

["That's exactly my point. Neutral means 0% of BOTH liberalism and conservatism....There's a very "us vs. them" mentality on this site that disturbs me greatly."]

Andy Schlafly: I doubt that "disturbs [you] greatly." More likely you don't like it when someone points out liberal deceit. That disturbs many liberals greatly.

68 comments

old comment by

EllwyenDarwin wrote:

It's been a year or so since I've last really read the bible but isn't there a passage that speaks very clearly about adding or taking away parts of the bible? If memory serves me correctly it's in Deuteronomy.

I think you're thinking of the last book of the fundie favourite, Revelation:

22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Technically that only applies to the Book of Revelation, not to the entire Babble though.

old comment by Giveitaday

It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics

Proven by who? You do realize that you just saying that something is "proven" doesn't mean that it actually is proven. You still need to pony up evidence that supports your assertion, especially in light of Conservapedia's somewhat tenuous grasp of the concept of "proof", it's habit of playing fast and loose with the truth, and it's childlike belief that history can be retconned by assertion and claims of "liberal bias".

so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen.

So how do you plan on handeling the parts of the bible that are quite liberal in it's message? Are you just going to rewrite it so that it suits your modern day conservative political ideology? You're going to sacrifice parts of your religion on the altar of partisan politics over the supposed "liberal bias" of people to whom the modern political distictions of liberal and conservative not only meant nothing, but were completely and utterly alien.

[There's a very "us vs. them" mentality on this site that disturbs me greatly."]

Andy Schlafly:I doubt that "disturbs [you] greatly

Because anyone who doesn't agree with your every pronouncement from on high must be a liberal intent on decieving innocent conservatives with liberal lies, since you seem to think the world is this black & white place where all conservatives are good and truthful white knights and all liberals are evil black hats who's every word is a lie.

It's long past time for you to grow up Andy. Time for your to join the real world where things aren't as simple as your black vs. white, Us vs. Them, conservative=always good, and liberal=always bad fantasy.

More likely you don't like it when someone points out liberal deceit.

Sure it is. After all, everybody knows that all liberals do is lie and decieve because that's what you said they do and you are Andy fucking Schlafly and you can fedefine reality just by saying so.

Now back to your regularly scheduled reality already in progress.

That disturbs many liberals greatly.

And you know this how? Personal experience? Lengthy study and testing? Or is it just you playing the "because I said so" card as if your opinion was synonymous with truth?

old comment by Doubting Thomas

Because we all know that "liberal" really means "totally evil anti-american devil worshiper who eats babies."

Really, I haven't seen the term "liberal" thrown around so loosely since the 1988 presidential election, or since listening to Rush Limbaugh's radio program.

And as far as his list of "liberal deceit" goes, I can think of some examples of "conservative deceit:"

Richard Nixon, Republican president, had to leave office in 1974 after the Watergate scandal when it was learned that he had sent burglars to bug the offices of the Democratic Party. His famous line was "I am not a crook."

Jim & Tammy Bakker, Christian televangelists, were found to be living a very lavish lifestyle complete with an air-conditioned dog house. A sex scandal made him resign his ministry, and accounting fraud landed him in prison.

Jimmy Swaggart, Christian televangelist, caught in 1988 visiting a New Orleans motel with a known prostitute. Later cried on TV in order to get forgiven. In 1991 was pulled over by the CHP in Indio, CA and had a prostitute riding in his car which he had picked up from the side of the road.

The aforementioned Rush Limbaugh, popular conservative radio program host, railed against people using drugs for years before having it revealed that he was an oxycontin addict.

Ted Haggard, Christian anti-gay preacher railed about how evil homosexuality is and how everyone should be good Christians. Was found to have taken methamphetamine with his gay lover.

Kent Hovind, rabid anti-evolutionist and pro-creationist, has a supposed PhD from a fake university which is little more than a diploma mill. Is currently serving time in prison for tax fraud.

Kitzmiller vs. Dover Board of Education. The judge in the case admonished the defendants, who had allowed "intelligent design" to be taught in classrooms, for lying under oath on several occasions or otherwise testifying inconsistently.

There are many, many more but I'm just getting started. I'd be here all day if I started researching pedophile Catholic priests, but Andy probably thinks that Catholics aren't Christians anyway.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"More likely you don't like it when someone points out liberal deceit. That disturbs many liberals greatly."

Unlike Conservative truth-telling, such as the belief that there were 'Communists' in America in the 50s. Watergate. And of course those WMDs in Iraq, amirite?

Of course Joseph McCarthy, Richard Nixon, and George W. Bush would never lie. Because they're Conservatives!

You're too deluded & in thrall to the GOP to think otherwise, Andy & everyone else on Conservapoodia. Indeed, you're to scared to argue your position here in FSTDT. Because the 'liberals' and their facts here would disturb you greatly.

@Doubting Thomas

"I'd be here all day if I started researching pedophile Catholic priests, but Andy probably thinks that Catholics aren't Christians anyway."

There's Protestant kiddy-diddling nonces too. Just say the names Tony Alamo, Joe Barron, and David J. Stewart*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_evangelist_scandals

With plenty more ammunition to use against the Religious Right.

*- Just Google his name, adding 'Guam' to the search terms. Very revealing.

Andy Schlafly & Karajou #fundie conservapedia.com

68 comments

Confused?