Evolution is rejected by many as Creation is rejected for the same reason, both in short are theories, get over it.
No, one is a theory, and the other is a fairy tail that people are trying to smuggle into classrooms through the back door with NO scientific backing.
Evolution is a theory, so it has no facts to back it up or it would be a science fact.
Let me talk to you about another Theory. The Theory of Gravity...? You have no idea the difference between the scientific value of Theory, hypothesis, or indeed, a wild, unsubstantiated guess.
Many Evolutionist will say that their theory can be proven true, um no you can't as you do not have evidence or proof and thus Evolution remains a theory.
We have the fossils. We have nylon eating bacteria. We have Antibiotic resistant bacteria. We have montitored evolution in numerous experiments. We have, while you insist on screeching otherwise, numerous intermediary fossils, more because ALL fossils are intermediary than anything else. What do you have?
Sorry folks, you can keep trying to find the body of Big Foot though.
*Sigh* Right, because without Bigfoot, everything we have falls apart.
Creation is a belief and does not need immediate scientific proof or do you have a different definition of a religious belief?
No, that is most certainly correct. Now tell me why something without Scientific proof should be looked upon by the scientific community with anything other than scorn and ridicule, when it's attempted to bypass everything.
For those who say Creation is not a belief, well, "I BELIEVE that the God Almighty Created... ", well your sentence starts with it and you can't prove it either so it's a belief, not a given fact.
Precisely. It is nothing more than a statement based on pure, unadulterated faith. Completely unprovable, with no evdence to back it WHATSOEVER, unobservable, untestable, and utterly, utterly unscientific. Tell me again why it should be taught as science.
Just because you do not have facts or evidence does not mean it (Creation or Evolution)is not possible or that it does not exist, it just means that you both need to quit wasting time arguing, debating, denying, pointing out to things in history/past, insulting, getting all fired up or whatever it is you folks get off on and actually do some research and find out for yourself which is the truth.
Indeed. However, the one with scientific backing should remain in schools, and the one based on faith should be left to Church. simple as that.
By the way folks, Googling online is not researching.
Oh? Then what does?
Lastly (this is especially for Atheist believers), If indeed you are right and there is no God, nothing will happen to you and I when we pass away whether we believed in a God or not. If you are wrong and there is a God, you will probably end up in a hot and painful place and I will end up in a very warm and comfortable place.
And when you are at the great hereafter, staring Shiva, or a Valkyrie, or Hades in the eye? Paschal's wager is considered a fallacy for a reason, bucko. It flat out ignores the numerous other religions out there, without even delving into sects WITHIN the religions. Once you do that, if anything, atheism becomes the best probability.
Do you really insist on taking the short end of the stick, if so, then just tell people who are religous that you don't want to go to heaven, we'll try our best to understand.
And I have to wonder why God would give a rat's ass as to how we believe we got here. Seems like a petulant child, prone to temper tantrums if everyone in the room isn't paying attention to him.
