It is a well known fact that science requires more faith than believing in Jesus Christ.
STOP RIGHT THERE.
It is not at all a well known "fact" that science requires any faith at all. Please explain.
This point alone brings your argument to a crashing halt, but let's continue...
But we both know that believing in either is a 'choice'.
I'm not at all sure that I know that at all.
Is believing in gravity a choice? Did you choose to believe in gravity?
Did you choose to believe that modern doctors are more effective than witch doctors?
I say that because if it was not a choice then all would believe or disbelieve.
All believe or disbelieve something; it's a binary option with no middle ground. The question is what does someone believe? Do you believe in Allah? Yahweh? Buddha?
However, the fact is in ourselves and of ourselves we cannot prove in our own understanding that either is truth.
How did you determine that?
With Christ it takes the personal commitment of trust and seeking Gods way to know if he is telling the truth and exists. This we can all come to know personally if true and so truth.
The same is true of Mohammed and Allah. Muslims make the same personal commitments to their faith, and they claim to know Allah's truth exists.
You and just about any other theist have contradictory claims. Why should I give your beliefs more credence than any others?
How did you determine that your beliefs in JC are correct, and that those of Muslims are not?
If your beliefs are "personally" true for you, it follows that they may not be personally true for everybody--which means that they have no place in public policy, and they definitely have no place in the endeavor of science.
But Science has no way to prove the theories hence they remain so.
Wrong. Completely, totally, utterly wrong.
You need to remember most of science takes a big leap of faith because no man can prove to himself the 'theories' are solid truths.
Do you have faith in gravity? Is all of modern medicine a big guess? You typed your little screed on a computer that uses information theories and the physics of electromagnetism to function. Are those "just so" stories?
Also--just to be clear--you're saying that faith is a bad thing?
But in Christ all things can be proved through God.
...and in Islam, all things can be proved through the Q'uran. In Hinduism, all things can be proved through the Bhagavad Gita. And so on. Circular arguments are circular, regardless of how much you want them to be true.