Going by that argument though, wouldn't it be more logical to kill the mother, who has now put both her's and her childs life in danger of being horrible and unlivable simply by not taking proper precautions to avoid said predicament, rather then killing an "unthinking bunch of cells" that might actually do something with it's life? I mean lets face it, even scientifically speaking, you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child. So simply becuase it's in a lesser stage of developement it no longer has rights? And I'll be honest, I think people who are making the decision on when "life is life" and when it's "Just a group of cells" must think they have Godlike knowledge, to make a decision like that. Society makes me wonder sometimes :/
35 comments
>>And I'll be honest, I think people who are making the decision on when "life is life" and when it's "Just a group of cells" must think they have Godlike knowledge, to make a decision like that. Society makes me wonder sometimes<<
"you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child."
Besides the things that have been stated here, it's somehow better to kill the mother, which will kill the fetus too, than just killing the fetus?
And God said unto the World, "Yea, I say unto you, that there is a typo in My Book. The Commandment should read 'Though shalt not kill in quantities lower than two.'"
"And I'll be honest, I think people who are making the decision on when "life is life" and when it's "Just a group of cells" must think they have Godlike knowledge, to make a decision like that. Society makes me wonder sometimes :/"
"Nothing short of some natural cuase [sic] or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child."
I mean lets face it, even scientifically speaking, you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child.
"Going by that argument though, wouldn't it be more logical to kill the mother"
"I mean lets face it, even scientifically speaking, you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child."Well, nothing short of some natural cause or some unnatural cause.
"And I'll be honest,"
That would be good.
"I think people who are making the decision on when "life is life" and when it's "Just a group of cells" must think they have Godlike knowledge, to make a decision like that."
So, we should let someone ELSE decide for us? We should leave it up to YOU?
"Society makes me wonder sometimes."
I bet lots of simple things make you wonder.
"I like how he ignores the 9 months of work the mother's body has to do to sustain the fetus. Apparently, that doesn't count. "
...you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child.
A group of cells is alive. Duh.
<<< I mean lets face it, even scientifically speaking, you can't deny the fact that once that sperm and egg join, nothing short of some natural cuase or horrible tragedy is going to prevent those cells from becoming a child. >>>
We get it. You think we should be killed for the hideous crime of having sex with someone who isn't you. You also think men have no responsibility whatsoever for birth control. After all, it's the stupid incubator's fault for getting herself pregnant, isn't it? It's got nothing to do with the man sticking his dick in her every chance he gets, oh no!
Go back to prehistory. We don't want you here.
Well, my argument is that having an abortion doesn't really do that much. I doubt anyone here would claim a stream of consciousness starting before birth, so if you gotta, you could. And you'd kill the mother? That's some logic. Really the thing about all these laws is that they don't affect that much, I can barely see me advocating them for any personal reason other than consistency. Humans adapt.
"...rather then killing an "unthinking bunch of cells" that might actually do something with it's life? "
I mean, unlike the incubator--er, woman--am I right, fellas?
"Going by that argument though, wouldn't it be more logical to" tl;dr...
Yes, that's nice dear. (*Performs 'Patronise You no Jutsu'; pats Strider2k on head *)
image
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
