The Fllod is not a myth, scientific evidence or not. God could have erased all the scientific evidence if He wanted to, because He is God!
26 comments
Yeah, could have done anything and made it look like he didn't or did the exact opposite just to fuck with us. That way you comfortably believe anything the Bible tells, even if it's impossible or contradicted by evidence, because God can do the impossible silly-willy! It's all very convenient.
So what you're saying is: God took a ridiculous, convoluted, contradictory route towards achieving his goals for humanity and the universe. Then, he erased all the evidence of this and magically conjured up overwhelming evidence for a completely different, much more logical series of events. Now, he expects us to accept the truth about what he did despite that evidence, even though he created us to require evidence for (and a lack of evidence against) things before we believe them.
Your god clearly has a number of serious mental disorders. I recommend professional help for him.
Which is true, he created the universe (why'd he do that anyway?)
He's All-poowerful, the creator, destroyer, redeemer and planner of all that is or ever was.
The point of the flood was what? Was it for chuckles? You don't like Earth? Start fresh, why drag Noah's family into it?
How do you wrap your head around the Noahian flood like it makes sense?
So this God fella loves us so much he hides any evidence of his existence but provides masses of evidence to prove his non-existence, but anyone who doesn't believe in his existence, thanks to all the evidence against and complete lack of evidence for, will spend eternity in the firees of hell.
This God fella must be a right a bastard - if he were real.
So God is deceitful.
Got it.
“The Fllod is not a myth, scientific evidence or not.”
Well if there’s no evidence for it, it cannot be more than a myth…
“God could have erased all the scientific evidence if He wanted to, because He is God!”
So, the same group of bleevers who crow about any archaeology find that supports the bible think that it’s just fine that the Fllod story is totally without support?
Thing is, he’d have to have not only withdrawn the evidence FOR a Fllod, but also created the evidence AGAINST a Fllod. So, you’re saying that the world DID destroy the existing civilizations that were on the Earth, then after the Flood, created and meticulously buried the artifacts of, for example, China and Egypt, and their records that did not notice everyone dying. AND he created ancient Fllod myths, but only in those cultures that feared Fllods, not those in places that never Fllod, like Mountainous regions, or someplace like Egypt that used the Flood and considered it a blessing.
God just went and piled up the lies…
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.