[It just seems like your stance is that homosexual people lack something innate in heterosexual people, and I'm wondering how you support this?]
Would you rather drink a glass of wine with one ounce of urine in it, or a glass of 1/2 urine and 1/2 wine? Neither, I'm sure. When discussing children, one should seek what is in the BEST interests of the child.
48 comments
I don´t know which shit of homeschool you do. Just one question. A gene that predisposes people to homosexuality is neither good or bad and, above all, your comparison is not afortunate. It´s enough one gene to make a person what he or she is. It´s like a lottery, which makes your bigoty even more depicable.
Is a blind person who has a child akin to adding an ounce of urine to a glass of wine?
Well, I have never consumed urine, and I've always figured that children should consume neither wine nor urine. No accounting for your tastes, though.
**Just how do those two statements connect? WTF?**
If you did a race-based study, you would find that teenagers who get arrested the most, have the lowest grades, the highest rate of teen pregnancy, and the highest dropout rate are black and Hispanic.
Holy non-sequitur, Batman! IIRC, this particular fundie earlier stated that she believed that the slave trade wasn't as immoral as abortion because slaves could try to run away and a zygote can't run away.
Worse, her "logic" was that slaves had made the "choice" of slavery over death, while "babies" were given no choice at all.
Therefore, by HomeschoolersRUs logic, we should ban black and Hispanic families from having children.
Somehow, I suspect a lot of wine, with or without urine in it, get's consumed during this particular homeschooling.
Is that what homeschooling does to you?
so if we're disciplining abusing the child, we do what's in our own selfish interest, but when it comes to indoctrinating them, we do what's in the child's best interest? Nice double standard!
@ Freecer Lurker --
The premise is that children are best raised in a two parent home with a mother and a father. Now I agree with that premise. In my mind that is certainly the ideal.
Congratulations: you're not only full of shit, you're proudly full of shit. All available evidence (you remember "evidence", right? It's what us non-solipsists go by) says that the gender combination of parent's doesn't make a difference to how well children thrive. So by pulling this heterosexist anti-reality shit out of your ass, you're actively supporting suboptimal outcomes for children. Congratulations, you raging piece of shit. I hope you're proud of yourself.
So, is the father or the mother who represents urine? Would two mother make the glass pure wine or pure urine?
Josef and Rosemarie Fritzl is mother and father of Elisabeth Fritzl. Was it in her best interest to be raised in their household?
The BEST interest of a child is to be brought up in a loving, open-minded and friendly home, by parents who care for the child's wellbeing and education, and respect the child's individuality and person.
Neglect and abuse, whether mental, physical or sexual, are neither more nor less common in different-gender-parents families than in same-gender-parents families. As long as there are role models of both gender in the circle of extended family and friends around the child, it doesn't matter whether the parents are of the same or different genders.
Re. wine and urine: Homeopathy includes the belief in water memory , consequently, ALL beverages containing water in some form have memory of urine (and excrement), as there has been at least one molecule of urine in Earth's water (about a 13C dilution). Quackery is fun!
Sir Elton John. David Furnish. Their two sons.
Queen Elizabeth II: the head of the Church of England - which gave so many of you Freakers their precious KJV - via her Speech in Parliament in 2013 finally put the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act into the statute book. She gave him that Knighthood.
Contextualise your way out of that MC Escher-esque multi-dimensional paradox, HoemskuledRetard'R'You.
Or the BS you spewed is the worst Non-Sequitur imaginable: unless you're Sarah Miles, 'Context' not allowed.
It's in the best interest of children: denying right-wingers such as you the right to lie to them.
You have only proved that you do .
When discussing lying retards, one should seek one simple fact by clicking the quote link. 'Tis curious that it based it's screename on what used to be the biggest chain of toyshops: since 2006? The rest is history...
...as is Freak Cuntservatives. The fact it 404s: and to a Japanese -hosted domain, it's in the BEST interests of all children.
So indeed: 'Context' never allowed. Good.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
