"The close quarters of the Columbia space shuttle was not an approriate place for women to share with men. 2/16/03"
Those of us who have grown up, emotionally as well as physically, can work in small spaces without becoming sexually unglued. Sorry about you, though.
"Was sex in space one of the experiments the columbia crew performed?"
No, I'm sure it wasn't. If you have credible evidence that it was, you should present it. If not, you should shut the fuck up.
"If so, the ones who were married committed adultery in space and the rest committed formnication and perhaps homosexuality."
What you've got there is wild, unsupported, unjust speculation. You should go with that "shut the fuck up" option I pointed out for you.
"If that is so then they got what they deserved."
If, if, if... all you have is ifs and unjust, cruel judgements. The Xian love just overwhelms me.
"Should those who help corrupt and introduce human depravity into space be regarded as heros? 2/16/03 "
"Help corrupt" what?
You haven't shown that anyone "introduced human depravity into space." There's is plenty of depravity here on earth that you could do something about. Why not start there. Feed the straving, house the homeless, boycott dictatorships, protest racism, etc.. Or, are you just a do-nothing, armchair ethicist picking at non-existing problems because it's easier than useful action?