Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (often referred to as The Theory of Survival of the Fittest) describes the positive effects resulting from any “pressure” on an animal species that removes the least fit among the species and allows only the most fit of the species to reproduce. Many of us are well aware of this “Survival of the Fittest” theory, but few are aware that Darwin also makes mention of the negative effects resulting from unlimited reproduction of a species’ least fit when the weak, the lazy, and the stupid are left unchecked.
We like to think otherwise, but our species, Homo sapiens-sapiens, isn’t that long “out of the trees” and the same laws of nature that affect all of God’s creatures apply equally to us. If we were to observe any other species that had been allowed to reproduce without limitations, we would know immediately what the consequences will be.
Whenever the weak; lazy; and stupid of a species are allowed to reproduce unimpeded by predators that feed off the weak; lazy; and stupid, they soon outnumber the strong, productive, and intelligent. When the weak/lazy/stupid dominate the gene pool, the entire population becomes weak/ lazy/stupid, (Democrats/Socialists/Communists) and then the population collapses.
14 comments
I can't think of any better example of the intellectually lazy and stupid than those who gather at sites like Free Republic, Whirled Nut Daily and other sites along the same lines.
Also, this is literally the same argument the Nazis used to justify killing and sterilizing people they considered of inferior genetic stock.
And of course you'll be happy to volunteer to sit on the panel deciding who qualifies as weak, lazy and stupid, right? Let's see if you qualify:
Can you bench press at least 200 pounds and climb a 50-foot rope in less than 30 seconds? If not, you're weak.
Do you work at least 50 hours a week at a job that produces an actual product, instead of sitting in an office shuffling paper? If not, you're lazy.
Do you have an advanced degree in a STEM field, or are you skilled in a craft such as plumbing or auto mechanics? If not, then you're stupid.
Please report to City Hall in the next five days for transportation to the Termination Center.
What part of Natural Selection did you miss when studying the ToE?
Besides, the "fittest" means the most suitable, the most adaptable, not the strongest. The ones who don't fit the environment they live in will not be able to survive and/or reproduce. They are not removed by their peers, but by nature.
Yeah, when the weak, the lazy and the stupid are left unchecked, stuff like this is happening:
image
Oh well, we're at least a couple of millions of years out of the trees. We diverged from our closest relatives; the Chimpanzees and Bonobos some two million years ago, and judging by our lack of tails, neither of us lived in the trees by then.
The consequences are epidemics, like the bubonic plague that killed off a third of the European population in its largest outbreak (so far), and the global climate change that is threatening to destroy life as we know it.
image
So DJ knows just enough about evolution to support his prejudices.
If nothing else, he might note that we've evolved into a WEAKER form than we once were. Our intelligence helps us compete more than fangs or claws would have.
Srtrange but true. Weak is the future, baby.
I just can't help but notice that he's *that* close to actually suggest eugenics.
In fact, I won't be surprised if he starts advocating killing off certain groups of people...
That's not what "survival of the fittest" means! Fitness is just the reproductionary success of individuals in a population across their lifetime. Individuals which are not adapted to their environment are less LIKELY to reproduce and therefore are not able to have many genetic successors. Notice that being "strong" or "smart" or "not lazy" can be advantageous for that... if they aren't actually disadvantageous: Huge muscle mass needs extreme amounts of energy which means that in a ressource-poor environment they are not helpful. Being a workaholic can be used by others, see certain ant species who just kill the queens of other ants and plant their own so that the host ant workers are feeding them instead and unknowingly proliferate THEIR young. And being smart doesn't help you in an environment which you can't change fast enough on your own. It takes enormous amounts of energy to keep our brains going, which can't be used for other things like additional muscle mass and has detrimental effects on child birth (Ever wondered why human children take so long to develope on their own after birth in relation to other mammalian children? It's because if they were birthed when the brain is already fully developed that would certainly kill its mother.) So no, you don't understand evolution and you can go fuck off with your semi-eugenical ideas.
Odd as it may seem, evolutionary fitness does not necessarily have anything to do with strength, activity, or intelligence. If a weak, lazy, stupid person turns out to be immune to a devastating plague, they will survive and their strong, active, intelligent neighbors will die out.
Since we don't know what future problems our descendants will face, we have no way of knowing what genetic traits to select for. Strength, etc., may have little value in the future.
Cue fat assed southerners without jobs pics, also known as Militias.
Swedes point.
Do you remember those fans at his campaigns and rallies now. Checking many interviews there's a lot of obvious: living off of/retired and living off of/never worked a day in their lives because of OLD MONEY. That's how they justify Trump and his kids all being rich because of Donalds fathers empire as 'making it on your own' because they're coasting through life on the same ticket.
Did you notice the last four, recent rally leading white supremists leaders, were living off family money? Bundy supporters were mostly on Government assistance or bumming off family. Tea Party signs saying 'get a job' and 'no welfare' carried by fat fucks with disability or pensions/medicare.
The people constantly bitching about others getting something without working for it are all recipients of that something, the Republican convinced them if any body else got something that would mean less for them.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.