I am a born again Christian.
So? Do you want a gold star or something?
We don't do sex outside of marriage.
You might not, but I know first hand that there are self described "born again" christians who do. Of course you will just assert that they aren't "true christians(TM)" or were not sincere if not outright lying about being "born again".
Fornication and adultery is wrong.
You can say that all day long and it will still not change the fact that both fornication and adultery are just as common, if not more so, in every sect, denomination, and brand of belief in christianity as it is elsewhere.
By my observations, calling yourself a "born again christian" or "true christian" is nothing more than self serving arrogance, an excuse for thinking of yourself as superior to those you deem unworthy or "not christian enough".
Evos claim there is no concept of sin. No concept of hell.
Bullshit. Anyone one accepts, and more improtantly understands, evolutionary theory will tell you that abstract concepts such as sin and hell are outside the scope of evolutionary theory which only addresses the mechanisms for genetic change over sucsessive generations.
In short words that you can process... You do not know what you are talking about.
When evos call themselves apes/primates
Humans are primates.
they want the evo lifestyle
There is no "evo lifestyle". Evolutionary theory is a subset of biology not a worldview. It has no tenets, advocates no behaviors, carries no dogma, and endorses no lifestyle. It is nothing more than a collection of data and observations.
The laws of the jungle do not oppose rape or pedophilia
Nor does the "law of the jungle" have anything whatsoever to do with the theory of evolution. Evolutionary theory is not concerned with individuals and the acts of individuals, it concerns species over successive generations and selective pressures on entire populations.
What you are doing is akin to trying to describe a beach by looking at an individual grain of sand.
I am shocked to see evos try to pretend morality and even discuss it.
"Pretend morality"? Theists don't have a monopoly on morality, and christianity in particular certainly doesn't. How many tens or hundreds of thousands or more have been murdered for imagined crimes against your "god"?
As long as you claim to base your life ariound the christian bible and the intolerance and attrocities it both describe and advocates you don't get to condescendingly lecture me about morality.
Age of gestation for apes is 7-10 years
You don't know what the word "gestation" means, do you?
Evos have no origin for the concept of pedophilia
Yes, we do. It's called society. Now, you self righteous arrogant fuck, now tell me where your origin for the concept of pedophilia comes from since your bible doesn't so much as mention it?
When I consider this, I understand why they despise the bible and bible authority.
So people who believe in evolution despise the bible and biblical authority? Then would you care to explain how it is that the vast majority of those who accept evolutionary theory are christians? There is nothing about evolutionary theory that requires one to reject or disbelieve in any deity.
As for biblical authority... there isn't any, the bibles authority has thankfully gone the way of the equally contemptable "authority" of Zeus, Mithras, Marduk, Jupiter, etc.
The goal of creatures is to multiply
No, the goal of creatures is to survive long enough to multiply.
In the bible males often married at age of 40
Aside from being highly suspect and likely untrue what does it have to do with evolution?
Why do evos think they know all about sexual sins when they deny the lawgiver?
Since when does acceptance of evolutionary theory require one to deny a "lawgiver"? What part of evolutionary theory advocates denying the existence of the aforementioned mythical entity?
You seem to think that all people who accept evolution are atheists and vice versa... they are not. In fact the majority of those who accept evolutionary theory are theists and the majority of those theists are quite likely to be christians. But I'm sure your response to that incontravertible fact is to simply and arrogantly assert that those people aren't "true christians", as if that decision was yours to make.
