Why do normies believe climate change but not looks science?
Isn't there just as much, if not more, scientific evidence for looks theory compared to climate change? Climate change is based on correlation which may not necessarily mean causation, but looks theory is based on actual randomised controlled and repeateable experiments which is the true gold standard of science. In fact, mini experiments are Automatically done for it whenever you go on tinder!
P.s someone on bluepill sub believed there was no correlation between Testosterone and violence and incels are more likely to commit violence hahahahahahahhaha
19 comments
Because climate change has been proven. "Looks science" is just bullshit.
Climate change is based on much more than mere correlations, dearie.
Looks theory isn't a thing. If you like someone, their looks means very little. Your love for them will make them look beautiful.
Your ugly attitude is first and foremost what makes you seem ugly, "incel".
Fine, now you have a research project. Go to it! Sorry but your own subjective experiences do not constitute science. Just for one example, how do you isolate variables, and separate out good looks from your shitty personality? I think you'll find there's a correlation, but that doesn't prove causation, as you point out. With climate we have millions of data points; how many would you consider to be a decent sample size?
Y'see, we have no way to tell whether she liked you but really DID have to go in to work that night, or whether it was an excuse. We can't tell if you were rated as high as number four in that group that only happened to have three females. We can't tell if she never met you, but her friend warned her to have nothing to do with you as you just whine all night, or have smelly feet, or are functionally tongue-tied in the presence of a female, or call that "experiment" a failure when you get just the plain-Jane friend of your target, so you have a snit and go home early to read comic books.
It's impossible to do such research because everyone has different opinions as to what they find attractive. Physical appearance may attract you initially, but if that's all there is in your relationship, it's doomed to failure because looks change over time. That's why some men (coughdonaldtrumpcough) go through multiple wives, each one younger than the one she's replacing.
Of course, looks don't matter if you're an asshole, which you'll realize as you continue being rejected by women you view only as walking vaginas.
It seems someone doesn't understand "science" or "experiment". Adding that to the ever-growing list of things incels don't get about reality.
Also, what the hell are looks theory and looks science?
Not that there's ever been a study but it's been proven that shallow, whiny little manbabies with shitty personalities who blame their shortcomings on everyone and everything else all while refusing to look in the mirror and realize the reason why they can't get their pee-pee's wet is staring back at them do poorly with women.
Edit: Anyone want to be this dipshit won't settle for anyone short of a Victoria's Secret model for a girlfriend? Typical "incel" bullshit; whine about how women are shallow all while being utterly superficial themselves.
Looks science. Right. If there was a fucking science to what makes people attractive not only would voting for Miss Universe be redundant but people would not furiously contest the results. Which they do. For really stupid reasons.
And even if physical attractiveness was an exact, concrete science that is not the deciding factor of romantic attraction. Hopeless imbeciles who recite the Looks/Money/Status mantra to try and convince themselves it's anything but themselves that's responsible for their rejection have less understanding of relationships and human emotion than a rabid badger.
@ Mr. Hall
image
*Ahem*
Godfrey Baguma. Married twice, father of eight.
Everything you think you know about women and what appeals to them is completely self-contradictory. There is a trend of both men and women imagining positive traits in those they find attractive but if your premise had any truth to it why would they imagine those traits? Their inherent attractiveness would be enough. Also if attraction was based in looks alone then why exactly do reprehensible shits push the idiocy they call "game" when dealing with women? If looks were all that mattered the social and psychological manipulation they involve would be entirely meaningless, in fact they wouldn't have to open their mouths. And the "game" strategies themselves, such as negging, take attention away from the one employing it and get women thinking less about the man hitting on them and more on their own self worth which is continuously worn down until they think sleeping with the asshole will validate their own existence.
Trying to boil romantic attraction to singular factors is doomed to fail, attraction is complex and emotions aren't inherently logical to begin with, but I can honestly say what you're using is even less logical. It's anti-logic. I mean honestly look at the other relationships in your life. Hasn't everyone had that friend that other people think is kind of a dick but you think they mean well? Hasn't everyone had a friend so fundamentally different from them they don't know why they get along together as well as they do? Hasn't everyone had that friend they make excuses for when they'd drop the hammer on somebody else who did the same thing? Why does that suddenly have to fundamentally change in your minds?
looks science
After 70 examples of looks science , Simon Weston - after severe burns via an Exocet anti-ship missile - this was the result:
image
Also, this:
image
Your call.
If he can marry: after what medical science did to regain his looks , then not only is Climate Change proven fact: and by your own argument, no less, then what was learned from Simon's 70 operations - thus advances in facial & plastic surgery that are now routine today - then your entire way of thinking: certainly via this 'analogy', never had the right to exist in the first place.
If he can do what you consider impossible: and he proved that what medical science previously thought was impossible can be done, what's your excuse, manbabies?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
