Men are violent dangerous pieces of shit

[OP of "Allowing men to marry younger women would fix things?"]

So NRx is about returning social mores to a state that would be more in line with what humans have done historically, right? Well, historically, even in the Western states that most NRx models for an ideal government are based on, men could marry girls way younger than 18. Why was this done? Why was it changed in recent times?

I think the change in that custom was brought about intentionally (as intentionally as anything in the Cathedral is done; I'm not implying that there was an evil cabal of fat lesbian feminists that unilaterally succeeded in taking women away from men, although the desire definitely does exist on their part) , as a means of "undermining patriarchy" (aka shit-testing society). My reasoning is as follows:

A big part of Cathedral dogma is that women need to be educated in order to become strawng and independent and better than men, because Equality. The only way women could begin to do that is if men stopped marrying them as virgins at 13 and forcing them to have and raise children. So my idea is that pedophilia actually helps patriarchy, in that women are more likely to be married, having children, only having sex with one guy, not getting divorced etc, if all they know is powerful older man dick and authority. Changing the laws and customs regarding "pedophilia" was a big step toward current clown world nuttery.

So....Islam is right on women? Maybe the part about marrying women off early is right. I don't know about the polygamy part though. Seems like a good way to have hordes of angry horny men around is to make it so that only a few men have access to most of the women; and in fact this extreme sexual deprivation and the resultant frustration is what fuels Jihadism.

I don't know about the bugging 9 year olds part either. I think prepubescence is too early to get started on explicitly sexual domination of women. Little boy buggery and diddling is totally out of the question.

I know this isn't an original thought in NRx circles, but I think its worth bringing up here on Plebbit where tons of newbs and others may see it.

EDIT: By pedophilia I mean anything that would be classed as statutory rape in the US. Sorry I didn't clarify that.

[Comment under "Based Poland"]

@m3Me_Magic

The nerve of that german dude to fly a flag in the Islamic State of Germany!

Reply from tchower:

Germany is so afraid of being associated with any form of racism or patriotism that they’d rather have racist, homophobic, misogynistic and bigoted Muslims rape and dominate their nation who favor their race over Germans. The interesting thing is, the US actually didn’t even want to fight Germany in world war 2. We just had to fight Japan and happened to be dragged into Europe and the Soviet Union’s problems! My grandparents fought in WW2 and have passed away, but hated Japan, and never said a word about Germany and what happened. It’s just all the Jews who run the money system in the US made a really big deal about the holocaust, even though the same thing happened in Asia to the Chinese, and whites being murdered and raped and sent to death camps in the Soviet Union by Jews. Since the Jews favor their own race over all others, the Jews ignored what the Japanese did and the white genocide organized by Jews in the Soviet Union. The Jewish role was critical for the formation of the Soviet Union and the genocide of more whites than Jews in the holocaust.

WRONG. There were ZERO transgenders at Stonewall. Nice attempt to "Transwash" gay history and co-opt and STEAL gay heroes. Stonewall was the victory of DRAG QUEENS who are gay men who dress like women for FUN, CAMP, and PERFORMANCE. You don't get to steal OUR history because DQs look KIND OF like TGs.

Re: Because your degree matters more to women then your personality apparently.

image

A Good Man Is Getting Even Harder to Find

Women with college degrees outnumber men by a significant margin. That means trouble for the future of love and relationships, writes Gerard Baker.

(wazzoz99)

I remember a few years ago, if anyone ever discussed the “hypergamy” question in the context of the earnings gaps and why it’s sometimes necessary on public forums , you would have immediately gotten the misogynist or even the incel label, for suggesting that men must outearn women for a rational reason. Now, as more empowered progressive women ironically complain about men not meeting traditional and sexist expectations, hypergamy is no longer a taboo topic to discuss. Although it’s important to note that no one in the liberal feminist leaning media has mentioned the term hypergamy to describes this phenomena, owing to its problematic links to the manosphere and Redpill philosophy.

Anyway, observing a lot of the so called progressive women who are reaching their early 30s being incredibly vocal about this issue tells me that eventually, we will have a neofeminist/neotraditionalist/5th wave feminist movement that will attempt to address the problems of modern women, one of which is the inability of men to outearn women. This movement will call on men to tolerate women expanding their gender roles and transcending gendered expectations whilst simultaneously calling on men to fulfil their gender roles and expectations for the good of women/western birth rates/marriage rates. And society will condone this inconsistent movement because prioritising female happiness above all else has become a western secular religion. I wonder if future generations of men will comply or will they stand up against hypocrisy and call out women?

(FastFourierTerraform)

Yeah, but not because of the women.

This men unmarried men means that any major problem will shatter our society like a hammer. Women won't be there when the shit hits the fan. And men with no families will prioritize themselves over society--as will literally every single woman.

That's assuming these men don't simply choose to tear civilization down.

We're doing a pretty good job of it right now. This is classic Jordan Peterson. It's incredibly dangerous for society to put so many men in such a shitty position. Even if most of them just wither and die in silence, there's a minority that will lash out, and that has the potential to topple society.

(reKSanity)

This is what happens when liberal schools make it easier for girls to succeed and harder for boys...I’m glad I have a daughter, i can’t imagine having a 14 year old son today.

I’m 34 and married maybe I’m lucky. It seems women want men who:

are older

taller

smarter - higher education

make more money than them

That will be a problem if schools are still making it harder for boys to succeed...girls will need to lower their standard because the only boys who will look at them soon will be beta male feminists...ugh...

(whynotbothey)

A good man means a man with a degree, but he should also be the one cooking in the house because women no longer cook at all, since being in a kitchen as a person with a vagina is very awful and demeaning. one who should shut the fuck up and stand back and never talk back and never, under any circumstance, stand up for his rights, one who should expect his woman to go around and talk about how they have sex and how big his dick is because it’s his body, her friends’ subject of discussion.

Also, you should never address the issue of whether you and your woman are a bit too overweight and should solve it because that means you are controlling her body and shaming her. Maybe cut down on drinking that beer in the evening because you’re a drunk and men who drink are rapists 100%.

And maybe never tell a girl she’s beautiful because that means you’re a creep. Don’t tell her you’re not interested in her either because then you’re a dick. Basically don’t breathe next to them at all because who does that to women?

Fucking hell, I’ve seen way too many posts about relationships lately on reddit and I must say I want to put bleach in my eyes. And i’m a girl.

“Girl, he asked for your number?! That piece of creeping shit!!!”

Now it’s about degrees. Because that was a thing I gave a shit about when I met my man.

But you know, on one hand, it’s good if this type of woman ignores men like these. Dodging a bullet.

(ludwigvonmisess)

Isn't this just biology though? Women are driven by their nature to seek out a mate that has the most resources and highest possible social status, a college degree is one of the main ways you'd gauge that in our society.

Yes, obviously. But feminists claim gender is a social construct and men and women are the same. Further, when men out earn women, they claim to be oppressed. And now that women out earn men, it’s men’s fault there aren’t any good partners.

... are you just trolling or did you legitimately not understand the reason this was posted here?

(The_toast_of_Reddit)

I see a reset where having a high school sweetheart will be in more of a demand than a degree holder. I'm talking about a really dependable man who cares about how his lady is feeling.

Degrees are becoming the next taxi medallion. The car is now worth more than the medallion. There are a lot of nice men who're debt free & working the trades. If there was a college debt reset I could see a flow of woman that want to snag up one of those nice men because they no longer have to worry about debt because at that stage in their life they're looking to settle down.

Basically women in the near future will demand a hallmark channel movie and not a degree.

(dongkong01)

I'm gonna get me a 20 year old village girl when I'm ready to get married (in my home country) . Cos the difference between her at 20 without degree and 23 with degree, is the loss of skin elasticity. Probably the hardest thing to hear for carousel riders

(Hirudin)

Women have outnumbered men in higher education since 1983. It's been a long time since gender-specific education programs have been justified.

Currently, the imbalance in favor of women is greater than the imbalance in favor of men that inspired the passage of Title IX, but the pile of government-sponsored educational freebies for women only just keeps getting bigger.

(Svenskbtch)

We often hear that men feel intimidated by strong - in this context read: better educated or higher earning - women.

To me, this seems like one of those things that most of us believe, but for which there is not by far as much anecdotal or empirical evidence as we would expect.

Rather, from the little I have observed, the problem is more that it is difficult for women to respect lesser earning or lesser educated men. In fact, many of my female friends admit something like this openly. And this appears to be not so much because they are concerned about financial stability (most of them are high-earners in their own right), but rather some kind of deeper, evolutionary drive. In fact, in most of the scarce instances of couples where women are better educated that I know, I sometimes observe a disturbing tendency towards condescension among women. Not because my friends are bad people, but because it frustrates them.

True, better educated men may also be condescending, but the dynamics are different and the effects often innocuous.

The only true exception to this that I know are good friends where she is a specialised surgeon and he a photographer and part-time house husband. She makes a multiple of what he does and runs the household finances. I am not sure how they manage to overcome these instincts, but one idea comes to mind: he is a brilliant photographer, close to the top of his field - the issue is only that it pays much less than hers. So maybe that is why she is able to respect him?

I would love to hear about your anecdotes on this.

(mrmensplights)

also possible that not all guys are secure enough to date girls with higher education or career

I can't believe this kinda thing get's taken seriously. You can bet any argument based on "Men are just insecure" or "Men are just toxic" or "Men are just weak" can always be traced back to anti-male sources. There was never any evidence to back up that claim. It's just feels.

In fact, it's not just feels but projection. Many studies have been done that prove men will marry up or marry down. However, women are hypergamous and have a strong preference for 'marrying up'. Their own behavior mixed with the advantages society bestows upon them has lead to fewer men they prefer to be available. It has nothing to do with men being insecure or male behavior at all. Men are rational actors in the sexual market place. Why in wouldn't men marry up and improve their quality of life? In fact, now that women vastly outnumber men as graduates of universities you see exactly this happening:

Partnership shift. Men are now more likely to marry up

A Record Share of Men Are “Marrying Up” Educationally

Women's progress boosts men who 'marry up,' study says

Men Are Now More Likely Than Women to “Marry Up”

More Men Than Women Are "Marrying Up", A New Study Finds

If Gender Clinics actually followed TRA rhetoric in treating 'gender dysphoria'...
...this is how it would go!

APPOINTMENT:

Patient: Hello, I'm here because I'm dysphoric.

Doctor: Well, what are you dysphoric about?

Patient: Well, I'm a male--

Doctor: AMAB you mean. Go on.

Patient: -- y-yes, but I'm a woman inside --

Doctor: And outside. Transwomen are women.

Patient: -- o-of course! But basically I need tits to feel my true self.

Doctor: ...Why? Transwomen are women.

Patient: Yeahhh, but women have tits and I don't, so I'm dysphor--

Doctor: Women don't need to have tits to be women.

Patient: O-Okay true, but what about my dick? I at least want SRS--

Doctor: Women can have dicks. Also, men can get pregnant. Why are you dysphoric? It sounds like you don't understand what men and women are.

Patient: Well, true that women can have penises and men can have vaginas, but--

Doctor: Indeed, it is true. So your dysphoria is baseless. Now get out of my office.

(Aug415)

In case anyone was wondering what they teach in our schools today. Taught that men don’t experience sexism today.

image

A photo of a paper entitled “Web of unequal power relations”, defining various types of prejudice and who they target

In my sociology class, the professor (who was a woman of color) taught us that not only are women the only victims of sexism, but also that people of color are the only victims of racism. She got in front of the class and said that "black people cannot be racist, only white people can be racist because they have all the power".

I was the only white person in the class and I felt so attacked.

Honestly what is wrong with education these days

My school is around 65-70% Asian. I’ve seen white classmates be harassed because of their race, and there’s nothing they can do about it. If an Asian student calls a white student “the next school shooter”, everyone laughs, and if the white kid were to reply “shut up dog eater” or some other racial stereotype, they’d be sent to the principal’s office. White students also weren’t allowed to make any European cultural groups, because apparently that would be racist. So while there’s a Black Student Union, Latinos Unidos, and 3 separate Asian clubs, the Italian and German clubs were not allowed to be made. People also act like white people still hold the power at the school, despite the student union being 100% Asian, and the school staff being majority ‘people of color’.

I am Hispanic and I hate the fact that people says that "white" people can't suffer from racism, just because you are the majority doesn't means that people can't attack you just because you are white, I have seen how being white has become in a meme of offensive "jokes" and how easy it is to say "fuck white people" and "white people be like" (follows by something humiliating).

Hispanic isn’t a race, but I agree.

(furry8)

Imagine the influence of feminism in Canada which has rached to the extent that they have been given enough power to brainwash children from young to make men live inferior life than women. More boys will turn to white knights, resort to alcohol and drugs to supress their emotions because they are made to think how masculinity is a problem.

Then people say feminism represents minority group when in reality most of the people are not against their practises.

I think you have hit the nail on the head when you say it brainwashes men throughout their lives.

Historically beautiful women could enchant men and live a very privileged existence- she receives beneficial treatment from every interaction she has with men. (my ex girlfriend would always get a discount when her car was serviced etc)

This is why we see the very ugly women fighting so hard for feminism - they always wanted the benefits of being beautiful. This is why stealing men's work comes naturally to her. Due to western governments : Now even the ugly women can get beneficial treatment.

It clearly sucks to be a poor Canadian guy. But what I have also noticed - Beautiful women are losing out due to feminism! (rarely) some of them will complain about it. E.g. we see guys who won't stop when a woman's car has broken down since they have been shown to make false allegations.

Of course, the ugly women are ecstatic about feminism.... They are the only beneficiaries

(LawUntoChaos)

Wow straight white men are just the fucking worst aren't they?

They never have anyone discriminate against them for their gender, skin color, or sexual orientation LOL fucking losers.

arrested development theme plays

Ironic isn't it, this document is an example of discrimination against men but due to the magical patriarchy it somehow doesn't count because they are so advantaged in today's society. It's not like there's large swaths of boys being left behind in school or a whole host of male victims being ignored. No, that's just completely ridiculous...

No, every male is either holding the reigns of power in a patriarchal system who has only been gifted their power by the grace of society's gendered norms (not through their own merit), how dare they hold women and minorities back! Or... They're an incel, neck beard, and their suffering is somehow their fault. Why aren't they good enough for women?! Even though Patriarchy hurts men too but you better not talk about it because you're taking away from the actual oppressed groups. Who cares about a whole generation of disillusioned and demoralised children. Nah! What's important is people's personal values and who we decide is worthy of empathy based on...

My own morally righteous assumption and a belief structure (where like everyone else, I'm making it up as I go along) that I demand you take as fact. Otherwise you are sexist/racist. If you point out my contradictions, it also means you are sexist/racist. If you talk out of turn, you disgusting white male oppressor, you are a sexist/racist. What's that? No, of course, you can't fucking win. You are a disgusting sub human filth who isn't allowed to have their oppressive opinion.

(Elfere)

Yeah... I posted once about how I was a straight white catholic married guy and that I'm proud of all those things.

Holy shit.

The amount of pure hate thrown my way... Some from people who call me a 'friend'

But it doesn't matter because, well, I'm a straight married white catholic. So therefore I've never once experienced any kind of discrimination.

Oh. And despite the fact thay all my ansectors were peasants. I'm clearly directly responsible for all slavery and religious intolerance in the history of the world.

(notacrackheadofficer)

I'm not even a Bernie fan , but that guy got played hard because so many people wanted a woman president. Women were much more interested in the war monging , rape defending, drunken cunt Hilary than him. They openly bragged their gender preference as their basis for choosing her.

(iainmf)

This seems to have come from the shift from discussing 'disadvantage' to 'privilege'.

Some research shows that if you have strong beliefs about privilege than you are less empathic to the privileged people. There was a study where they tested peoples change in attitudes after a class on white privilege and they found that rather than being more empathic to poor black people they students became less empathic to poor white people. Another study found that people who believed strongly in male privilege much more sceptical of research that showed sex differences which benefit men (ie a study that showed men were better at X). Also, a study of the trolley dilemma found that feminists were more likely to sacrifice men than the general population. It's reasonable to assume feminists believe in male privilege.

All this leads me to believe that the result of the change in the language you mentioned will be the dehumanisation of privileged groups. It possible that something like this was the intention behind the change in language based on the misguided belief that it will help the oppressed.

(CJPsalm139)

How is this not blatant propaganda to literally ANYONE?! It's literally racist, sexist, (not sure if this is a real word but it's the closest I can get) religiophobic, and all around terrible.

(littlefilms)

I'm Asian and I've been told that only white people can be racist which just feels patronising imo. First off what is the definition of racism? I always assumed it's the ignorant assumption that your race is superior than others?

So for them to say only white people can be racist, is ironically them admitting how they see white people compared to everyone else, they're basically saying only white people can realistically see themselves as superior compared to black people and it be offensive. If a white person thought they were genetically superior to a black person, I'm sure these people would see it as racist, but if a black person thought they were genetically superior, being taller/bigger, stronger, faster, well endowed, nice ass instead of a flat chicken butt etc, that's not racist? Ironically these people sound like the racists they are condemning e.g:

"only white people can be racist, because only white people can realistically think they're better than everyone, no one could possibly think a black person is superior, come on look at them they're black. Every single white person loves being white where as no one could possibly feel superior being black, what can black people be proud of? Nothing"

(robcars)

Yeah that's like saying there's no such thing as reverse discrimination. It happens all the time. I have worked at a hospital that was mostly women and they were always mean to the man and said oh you're a man you can do that you're a man you can do this. I always thought you can do the worst jobs. I started to go to nursing school and experienced excessive bias. This was even in California. The women teachers did not like men. I also had a problem with one lesbian nurse in college that was an instructor. She said men should not be doing this kind of work this is Woman's Work and men are taking good jobs from women. I complain to the dean but it did no good because she had a high pass rate on the exam. Finally I just had to drop out. Is really caused me to have a great hatred towards women. And a lack of respect towards most of them.

(topsyandpip56)

That is applied Marxism. Omg I got to live long enough to see disguised marxism taught in schools in United States.

You can find a word for anything you don;t like and say is oppression.

Precisely this. The west was warned multiple times during the cold war and long before that foreign subversion especially in relation to social justice matters would be used to install far leftist governments. This nonsense coupled with the growing influence of China on businesses is the result of ignoring the warnings or being a useful idiot.

(Jyvur_Entropy)

Yeah :/ I majored in Creative Writing and English Lit. You'd think there wouldn't be a TON of SJW talk, maybe some in works that deal with gender and race. Nah, I feel like I got a freaking gender theory degree. Every class delves into colonialism, intersectionality and such.

Higher ed also sends white women a lot of mixed messages about where they fit into this whole web of oppression. In one class, I learn that I'm so damn privileged I've got nothing to complain about. In other, I'm told that women are the 'subalterns of white people' and that, white women are also colonized, but by their husbands and fathers.

Eck. I'm sick of it all. I just wanted to talk about books! :(

(BonelessSkinless)

"I won't date you if you're not tall enough"

"I can hit you, cut you, scratch you and spit on you and you can't hit back. The second you do, I'll cry enact my double standard pussy pass power and have you arrested"

"If you're not making upwards of 70-90k a year don't talk to me. Money, money, me, me, me, money"

"Guys don't get insecure, just shut up you'll like it, you're a guy right you should feel honored to get with me"

"Your clothes aren't brand name and you don't have this whole list of qualities I want so goodbye"

"You have to pay for every meal, bill, expense and anything that comes up and I MIGHT look at your dick for 4 minutes on the weekend and I said MIGHT and that's if you clean the kitchen and give me 2 footrubs after your 12 hour shift"

You're right, we don't experience strife or sexism, silly me.

You should be familiar with the definition of delusion if you're an atheist. A biological male who thinks he is a female is delusional by definition.

Why are modern urologists/endocrinologists so misandristic and ignorant?

Claiming that a 4 Inch length 2 Inch girth penis is normal and totally acceptable….

Just lol at any "doctor" who denies the importance of sexual dimorphism

since when did emotions and gynocentric/liberal ideologies became more valued than Cold rational Facts?

A guy with a 4 Inch length and 2 Inch girth penis will get terrified and socially belittled by almost every sexual Encounters, he might find a Woman for a Long term relationship were emotional and financial support primarily matters, but sexually wise he will never be a raw satisfaction, he will never be able to have truly satisfying ONS, he will be the typical long term relationship provider who's considered by over 30 women when their sexual wild years are over

No sex toys, creativity, communication or Position will ever be able to compensate for the lack of a well sized dimorphic human male penis

Thats literally just a meme created by the feministic 68s Generation who tried to make sex into a eloquent science

for hundred thousands of years humans relied on the typical Basic primitive in and out game during sex (of Course only strong men with a relatively large penis had Access to sex, weak unmasculine men were simply wiped out of the genepool), but now suddenly in the 20th century a Generation of "sexual experts" wants to tell us that Women's sexuality is far more than just Basic Penetration, and that women actually hate Basic vaginal sex because they are magical complex sexual beings who prefer a intuitive sensual romantic twink who can effectively hit her 230830248 errogenous spots over a strong primitive masculine man

But no no no, penis size and masculine dimorphism doesnt matter, every Woman is a lesbian anyways

It's About personality, humans especially women are complex individual beings who have a complex individual sexuality, women dont want brutish vaginal Penetration with a large thick penis, no no they want a feministic feminine man with a small penis who's totally fine in making himself to a submissive lesbian by only Performing oral sex

Women dont want to be dominated, it just happens so that 98% of women want a Partner who's taller then themselves teehee

Such Arguments are basically Nothing else than human narcissism in a nutshell, this whole "Sexual dimorphism does not matter women want nice Kind husbands" nonsense is just a direct proof that most humans on this earth totally lack self awareness

Claiming that women and men are both complex individuals, and that Basic primitive natural dimorphic traits dont matter since it's all About "Personality and communication"

We are one evolutionary stage higher than a caveman… And we still Claim that humans are non-primitive morally superior individual beings….

This here basically describes 95% of all modern urological/endocrinological "doctors"
image

btw if you want to get some urological and sexual Facts from A REAL RATIONAL BASED urologist/andrologist then visit the Website of the austrian urologist"Dr Georg Pfau" he's an extremely based doctors who doesnt care About liberalistic or feministic Moral constructs but only About Cold rational facts

i want a penile transplant so bad

van der merwe from south africa does it, but he charges 300 euro alone for consultation

ive seen some Pictures of it, and it seems promising

i want to have a big fat cock with which im able to totally and brutishly fill out a Woman, give her Deep extreme orgasm just from brutishly fucking her with a large penis

this is what 95% of women prefer over all that "Muh complex sexuality with lots of communication" bullshit which is just used to delude the small average man

they just wont admit it to a average man, but chad and tyrone with their big cocks are getting the most raw and satisyfing sex you can only Dream of

Ive seen it on dozens of private sex video on WhatsApp Groups sent by the chads of the Groups, as i already mentioned, there was a 16 year old chad who recorded himself fucking his milf teacher with his huge penis, she screamed "finally a big dick!!!!" like her life depends on it

women are total liars with their "It's About sexual skills and muh communication"

NOTHING will ever satisfy a Woman as much as a dimorphic dominant tall wide framed tyrone or chad with a large hard penis

I have a Right to have a large penis, especially if im the victim of womens feminization and our feministic Propaganda which has lead to the fact that urologists are ignorant and misandristic against hypogonadal men

Im seriously thinking About sueing this state to pay for a penile transplant, im physically impotent and underdeveloped but no urologists has ever helped me despite the fact that my testicles are just as small as the ones of a 10 year old boy

I’m a 14 year old. I want to give a commentary on fetishes and how they’ve affected my friends.

I apologize if this post isn’t 100% about AGP. But it is relevant. This has been a point of concern for me for a while and I needed to get it off my chest.

I will say I do think actual trans people exist, I have met some who are normal and nice people. I just think they get over shrouded by all the fetishists out there.

I’ve noticed a lot of my friends and even myself develop fetishes. At first I thought it was normal at age since y’know... puberty but then I saw people like you talking about how it was concerning and I took a look into it.

I used to have a lot of fetishes when I was 12-13, I’ve gotten rid of a majority of them and am trying to get rid of the rest. I’ve noticed my friends are into things and it concerns me a bit.

A have a friend who’s into dragons, which honestly pretty tame when it comes to fetish standards but he’s also being into beaten. One of my other friends is into being tied up.

What really concerns me is my MtF friend. He’s into ABDL, petplay and BDSM... and like me he’s 14...

According to some people we should still have our innocence at this age, or at least have some of it. Out of the many friends I have only 1 has really maintained their innocence. I lost my innocence at age 11. It wasn’t due to anything sexual it was because when I entered middle school, I heard and saw everyone cussing at eachother, being mean to eachother, talking about sex. 5th grade was a happy and friendly enviroment. This wasn’t. I will say 7th grade was probably the best time of my life so far, but that’s a whole other topic.

I feel like we’re growing up a bit too fast. A lot of my friend’s friends have already lost their virginity.

It just feels like something is... wrong. I’m assuming that this kind of stuff isn’t normal. But if yall older folk could confirm or deny it that’d be great. I’d also like to hear your commentary on the situation as well.

EDIT: Aight it 100% not normal as I expected. I also get this weird feeling that people on this sub hate me now but hey that could just be my anxiety talking.

Re: 'Shy and awkward’ student, 19, who googled 'how to make a friend' then touched a schoolgirl, 17, on her arm and waist while trying to chat to her faces JAIL after sex assault conviction

(gnulligan)

The victim burst into tears during the second encounter and went to police with her mother, claiming Griffiths 'would have touched her breast had she not moved away'.

Oh god it must be so traumatizing that he wanted to be her friend. Yes she's definitely the victim here.

Fucking scum. America, Australia and India are shitholes thanks to the UK and its disgusting culture.

(RPdOF)

why are we wasting police and court time on this nonsense?

B/c a major part of the feminist agenda is to criminalize the very existence of heterosexual men.

(CargoShorts88)

I pray for all the shy and awkward young men in school and higher education. As if getting harassed, ridiculed and assaulted isn't enough on their plate to deal with.

This society can get fucked.

It's honestly an untenable situation. Flirting and courting requires some degree of physical contact in modern/Western societies, and as long as women refuse to initiate things (which by and large is the case) you're REALLY rolling the dice if you dare to make an advance.

Well they've raised it from untenable to IMPOSSIBLE with this Metoo culture of instant justice based on accusation alone.

God help these young men. God help them all for having no choice but to live in this awful world. Might as well just stay shut-ins for the rest of their lives at home rather then stay shut-ins in a jail cell.

r/MGTOW is not without merit. I just take issue with the rampant misogyny over there, as well as the not infrequent racism.

(GlitteringMatter9)

We can think of no motivation for you to touch the victim other than sexual

This part of the quote is even worse. What a stupid assumption. Heterosexual guys touch other guys all the time. It's part of natural human interaction. We are not moving toward an age of enlightenment, we are moving towards the dark ages of human interaction, and in the end it will hurt women the most, as they will be treated as though they have lepers by 50% of the population.

(McFeely_Smackup)

'It was quite a while - three to five seconds. He smirked at me, he didn't stop he just touched me and walked off and I broke down crying - it was quite traumatic.
'I struggled for a couple of months afterwards, I was applying for Oxford at the time and I found going to Oxford a stressful thing.

How are we supposed to take this person seriously. a guy smiles at her and touched her arm, and now she's got PTSD and can't go to school?

I don't think we should be holding people accountable for other peoples mental illness.

(mrmensplights)

Feminism teaches girls to live in perpetual irrational fear. There's a tiny little helpful sexual instinct in women that causes them to be cautious. Feminist propaganda fans this spark into a raging inferno and then teaches girls that it's totally legitimate to project their irrational internal feeling on others as though it's real. They jump at every shadow and are afraid of everyone. Their lives are a prison built by ideological brainwashing saying shit like "I can't even go out after dark alone!".

None of it is true. No studies or statistics back up any of it. In fact, it's quite the opposite. There is no safer identity in all of society than 'young woman'. Sexual violence against women is almost never instigated by a stranger, and women really don't face much violence at all in any context compared to men.

Glad to see this dudes will have to register as a sex offender and rot in jail for the heinous crime of touching a paranoid delusional girl on the arm. /s Touched her on the fucking arm... Students today are weak shit.

Re: 'Shy and awkward’ student, 19, who googled 'how to make a friend' then touched a schoolgirl, 17, on her arm and waist while trying to chat to her faces JAIL after sex assault conviction

Imagine a world where men could send women to jail just for touching them. Like, just permanently end their future(judicially, professionally and socially destroy them) and incarcerate them(with other far worse criminals no less), just because of a touch. No violence. No ill-intent. No danger. No harm. Literally just light tactile contact(not even skin-on-skin).

Imagine a world where men could actually think this is an appropriate and equal response to a woman touching them. I can't even imagine such a world and, yet, this is what is considered normal when the genders are reversed. It is just insane the level of power that women have, and the level of hatred and disregard that exists for men(regardless of their intent or the circumstances placed upon them) for this to even be possible.

This also wouldn't even have happened if it was another woman who had touched her, nor would it happen if it was a man touching another man or a woman touching a man. At best they would think "oh, that's a bit awkward/inappropriate" and then moved on. They wouldn't see themselves as victims or respond with violent anger. The only punishment I could even justify in this scenario is a course in etiquette, and even that seems excessive given the circumstances.

I've been touched without consent by females ever since high school. One even grabbed my dick during a pair assignment while the teacher was out of the room. Everyone thought it was funny. Her only punishment was not being paired with me again. Such male privilege. And don't get me started on parties and bars.

I've had women grab my ass when I worked at a bar, and they weren't doing it in a nice way at all, and yet the thought of sending them to jail was not even remotely on my list of responses. There was no response of anger, vitriol or violence.

To me, this would be as much of an over-reaction walking on the street and having a stray dog come up to me, looking for food, and poking me with its nose(with no sign of violence whatsoever), and then me going "that dog needs to be put down, it's oppressing me".

If a woman attacked violently, then I would consider pressing charges because she is a danger to herself and others(ironically, she would probably still not face any jail time because she's a woman).

”Imagine a world where men could send women to jail just for touching them.”

Yeah, on the waist, without saying a word, and the girl having said "stop" before.

Pretty sure that is not how it went down but, even if it was, that still doesn't justify the type of overreaction it got.

It's not normal to go up to someone, touch them on the waist without saying anything, and leave.

It doesn't matter whether it's normal or not, the point is the type of response you would have to it and why you have that response. If a woman touched you on the waist, under any circumstance, you would not consider sending her to jail for it. You would also not just presume the worse of intensions against her character either.

If a stray dog came up to me on the street and touched my knee with his paw, that wouldn't be "normal" but it also would justify me kicking that dog or calling for that dog to be put down either. And, people are capable of basic empathy or sympathy for a dog, surely they are capable of doing the same for an awkward, sheltered and inexperienced teenage boy too.

lmao imagine actually defending this.

Are you are not familiar with the concept of critical thought? I understand how fair judgement and fair treatment might seem like radical concepts to you, at least when it comes to men, but surely these concepts aren't beyond your comprehension. I also understand how ingrained misandry is into our daily thinking and rationalizing, which these types of cases exemplify perfectly, which is why I pointing these things out.

A woman can never be too cautious with a man who touched her fucking waist without permission.

"can never be too cautious"? What are you even talking about here? Are you going to instantly die from someone touching you? Are you going to fall ill or be crippled from a light touch? Or are you just speculating and escalating on other shit that didn't happen? if someone walks next to me, does that give me the right to punch them in "self-defence" because "you can never be too cautious"? And, yes, you can be too cautious how how you exercise that caution is overt and detrimental to others.

A man doesn't have a "right" to touch any woman like that.

Who said anything about having a "right" to anything? Is this another projection? You can certainly say "hey, don't touch me" to anyone you like and you can communicate that clearly and constructively to anyone. You can certainly take some steps to prevent it from happening, including removing yourself from the situation or removing them from the situation. The's not the point. The point is the type of reaction you have being disproportionate and targeted. It's like no one has the "right" to insult me or "offend" me, and yet that doesn't mean I get to assault them or send them to jail if they do.

I'll concede that the punishment is disproportionately severe, but he deserved to be punished nonetheless.

Do you think a woman would warrant that type of punishment if she touched another woman? Or if a woman touched a man? Or if a man touched another man on the waist? How is it that you can only truly justify this type of overt vitriolic reaction when it comes to men, and only men, touching a woman?

Maybe a fine + hours of community service and some classes on how to not creep women out.

Have you ever considered the possibility that the way women see/treat men, or how easily/quickly women can be "creeped out" by men(and only men) might also be majorly detrimental or inherently bigoted? That, maybe, society is teaching women to have an irrationally negative disposition towards men or a strong prejudice against men that is just culturally accepted. What if, for example, it was a black person touching white person, and then that white person had an overly-violent reaction to being touched by a black person because they are black, and then called for jail time or "community service and classes on how not to creep white people out"?

[on trans men]

When it’s not a mentally ill lesbian who thinks she needs a penis to have sex with a woman, it’s a mentally ill straight girl fetishizing feminine gay men and using disgusting homophobic slurs to refer to herself.

Bottom line: it’s a fetish.

I wish I was gay

Obviously, lesbians face a lot of social discrimination due to their orientation which is shitty (thankfully it is slowly changing now) but i just wish i was born gay. I would give everything to not be attracted to these pathetic and sick men creatures. Its actually offensive to me. I dont want to have anything to do with this violence and sex driven pricks. Its unfair for women to have to deal with men. Men are the uglier, less empathetic and moral gender. If God is a man then hes a mysogynistic bastard. If God is a man then fuck him because women are screwed because of it for eternity. Women actually want loyal love that lasts a lifetime. Men? They just want to spread their seed (whatever the fuck that means - most of them dont do it to actually have offspring, they do it only to have meaningless, selfish sex with any willing woman). How deep and important mission. Men are not deserving of woman’s love. Every straight woman will realize this at one point of her life

Ah yes, QueersAgainstHate. The most ironic people of them all listing subs like truelesbians as hate and demand they be shut down.

Because to them it is hatred for actual lesbians to have spaces on the internet without the TQ people transplaining their sexuality to them and reeking of homophobia. Get the message visitors from QueersAgainstHate, you are hateful, not us.

Re: Is there anything more cucked?

image

My daughter is 11 and came home with $50 she charged some kid $50 to be his girlfriend for a week I don't know if I should be mad or high five her.. sos.

(DegenerateInnocent)

Yeah, high five your 11yo for being a literal whore.

Slayyy girl. QWEEN. Hu$$tlin, Makin dat $$$.

At such a young age too, what an enterprising independent girl. At her rate of maturity, she'll be imported to Dubai as a human toilet at the record-breaking age of 14.

(monkmode27)

The Dubai portapotty thing is lifefuel. I remember reading one woman cried after being shit on and I laughed out loud. Based Arabs tbhngl.

lol they really do that? thats fucking based actually ngl

Yep. They know women will do anything if you pay them enough, so for fun they fly out these little Instagram sluts and take turns shitting on their face and tits.

(I_CAPE_RUNTS)

And when these foids turn 35 and it’s time to hang up the cleats? It’s time for vanilla missionary in the dark twice a month with mr. beta bux. “What’s past is past, tee hee!”

I have always wondered how the trans movement had such a massive support within institutions like ministries and NGOs or the media. It really came out of nowhere in a decade.

I fear that the trans movement is actually just the spearhead of something much bigger and that actually does align with a lot of today's global elites ideology: transhumanism (see Get Out for an idea of where such ideology can lead to).

I think that the goal for these people is that if they can make the general population accept that a male can be a female just because he wants to, then whatever body enhancement and modification that technology will be able to provide would be completely ok: "If he can get a uterus implanted and a fake vagina because he feels like he is a woman, then there is no problem for my old body to get a fresh pair of lungs and legs." Cue the commodification of the body on an even bigger scale.

I feel like the acceptance of this charade that sex is not something that we are naturally born with but something that we can change at will is just the first step of something even more sinister. Any thoughts on that?

I’d say because there’s that many fucking pride rallies and the society is changing just for them. It’s getting annoying. I don’t care if you’re gay, you don’t care if I’m straight. I prefer humble people over people that are the opposite

TERF = trans exclusionary radical feminist. It's what trans rights activists call women who think that sex (as in, sex not gender) which causes the oppression of women worldwide. Naturally, radfems do not think a man can "become" a woman since women have vagina, uterus, labia, secondary-sex characteristics etc. and men cannot build those structures from regular skin. People often use the word TERF in the way people used to use the word "dyke."

Well, the Media got ONE thing right about the attack on the Saudi oil fields.

The first letter of the name of the country that caused it is indeed "I".

For these guys, being a woman is basically living a porno fantasy. They need to not only be average women but become porn star quality women and are often sad and angry when they can't become that. To them, even passing as a normal every day woman is not enough. They wanna be hot and sexy because they believe women live on some kind of "easy mode" where the world bends over for women and pleases them no matter what.

And then these guys get encouraged by fellows in the same boat, all to increase delusion by accepting it in others. They all just wanna be porno sluts and sadly, they think women are one dimensional things - to them, everything women do is related to sex. Wouldn't put it past them to fetishize being an escort. Prostitution is an ugly business at times and very dangerous, yet some might fetishize it. Jack the Ripper killing them sold separately, though maybe some of them would enjoy that. Because to these guys, a woman is nothing but a living sexual thing. Doesn't have hopes, dreams, or thoughts, other than "Oh my god, need big black cock!". So they fetishize half the population and often marry it to some casual racist assumptions.

Women may love to wear a dress, but it making their pee pee hard isn't part of it. I mean she might feel beautiful in it and sexy but these guys probably start jizzing in their pants at the sight of themselves in lipstick and heels. And that's the problem. They're not really women just guys who love women so much, can't get one to date them, and want to become the thing they desire. So that way they don't need to consider another's feelings - for them, "they are the porn."

Re: Based mom

image

Transcript: Told my parents I got raped

I finally told my parents that my cousin raped me.

My dad was nice about it but sad.

My mom called me a whore, told me I should kill myself, called me a cousin

fucker, called me stupid, and said I wanted it

She only calls me cousin fucker now instead of my name

She's such a liar , she's only telling her parents on the basis of regret hoping to get her cousin punished. Mum is based and knows her daughter is a little whore. If you get raped , you're also likely to be killed too. Why would someone you can easily identify rape you? Fucking liar whore. Bitch be gone

Prediction for the 2020s: Women are going to put any interaction with them behind a paywall

Think about how many women you see today (mostly on twitter) e-begging and getting that cash delivered by spineless fucking retards. And then there are the women that make more than you could in a week of wagelsavery, just by selling videos of them fucking their boyfriends and auctioning off their underwear. Some are lucky enough to get offers to have their fucking bills paid by these random desperate rich cucks, it's maddening and disgusting.

Now think about the generation that has been trained to accept that donations = personal attention, from streamers etc. You can see how these bitches might put this shit together and literally start demanding a fee for literally any of their attention. You want her to text you back? Venmo motherfucker. Purchase the monogamy season pass to not get cheated on, lmao.

I can't expect something this god damned insane to not happen in the next decade. I mean, we're already forced into lives of loneliness, so it makes sense that there could soon be "micro-social-transactions" like paying $20 to have a girl sit next to you on a bus or something. Like uber for socializing.

Re: Just more of the most based religion on Earth

image

Image of a man from Memri TV with captions saying:

Nowadays, wife-beating is illegal in the West. Illegal!

Can you imagine such barbarism?

Unbelievable.

Islamic beating is literally a joke. First you have to go through a few steps before you can resort to beating and then once you have exhausted all efforts you just hit her on the shoulder to scare her.

If you touch her face not only is your marriage over by law. Her family could beat the shit out of you. People who talk about this alpha posturing don't know what the fuck they're talking about.

It's like when the teachers would say open your hand and slap it with stick as a form of beating.

Also mohammed said that people who resort to "beatings" are not honorable. Back then people would die to protect their honor because it was the most important thing to them.

EDIT because someone sperged out about mohammed marrying the daughter of the second most powerful and influncial man in Islam Abu-bakr: Ayisha was 18-20 when she was married mohammed.

Only person out of 100,000 people who followed mohammed in his life were credited with saying the mohammed married ayisha when she was 9. This man was at the time in Iraq and over 60 years of age and was described as being confused at his old age (probably dementia). He said this claim in Iraq despite studying everything about Islam in madina. So he said it in a far away place where no one can confront his lies:

All sources are here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGOyEt5szM0

Hm. Well at least they're still based enough to not take any of that "marital rape" crap seriously. Imagine a husband not being entitled to sex from his own wife, she wouldn't be a wife anymore she'd just be a parasite (which is what Western women are)

cuckslam JFL Saudi Arabia is a feminist country

They recently allowed women to drive and Allah immediately punished them by lighting half their oil factories on fire.

Just abandon your human rights bro.

That's very subjective. Human rights are only what the current social norms of white people are. If white cucks make a law to chemically castrate rapists then it's not against human rights, but if Muslims do anything similar to women (who do far worse things than rape, such as paternity fraud) the whole West flips out about human rights.

Ultra based isalm as always. Shariah law when?

With the Hispanic invasion of the US probably never. But in Europe... soon.

Inshallah, Sweden is already becoming one. Allahu akbar. True Muslims will never accept the filthy way of the west.

Now we only have to wait.

Lyndon Johnson was a narcissist. He probably had JFK killed.

Lyndon Johnson is often listed as “the most narcissistic president”. He was known for bullying and harassing people until they gave him what he wanted. He would also embarrass the press corps by taking out his penis and waving it at them.

He always wanted to be president, and JFK had just stated privately that LBJ would not be his running mate when he ran for a second term.

JFK was murdered in Texas, LBJ’s home state where he had many connections. At the last moment the motorcade lineup was changed and the Secret Service were no longer in the correct position.

Jackie Kennedy refused to change clothing or wash the blood from her hair when LBJ forced her to be on Air Force One for his emergency swearing-in ceremony. She said “I want them to see what they did”.

After LBJ’s term ended, he drank himself to death in just a few years. When asked about his failing health, he said he had always wanted to be president and now no longer had anything to live for (family not important).

He also proposed to his wife on their first date. Who does that? Red flags.

I also read recently where some letter was released last year from Jackie stating she thought LBJ arranged her husband’s death. LBJ also had multiple associates in Texas who were charged with (but usually not convicted) of murdering various rivals of LBJ.

Subsequently, many associates of JFK were also murdered, including his brother RFK.

What really fascinated me is how many journalists and politicians in DC probably knew or suspected this about LBJ. The children of some of these people are now elderly, and they sometimes write memoirs which tend to be rambling with odd nuggets thrown in hinting at the dark secret.

There is NO SUCH THING as girl dick, lady dick, or feminine penis. Men are NOT lesbians, no matter what they feel like. HRT does not change ANY biological traits or characteristics, it just overdoses a person’s body with more hormones than they’re supposed to have. Feelings are not fact.

Ffs I need to go camping or something.

I never understood that guys appeal. altrighters and so many "manosphere" guys treat him like a god and chosen one. i see it for what it is... cringe cuckcservatives falling for bullshit

All of politics is just different ways for women to manipulate and exploit men.

We (rightly) bitch about feminism a lot, but traditional gender roles are all about protecting and caring for women and shit too. Prove your masculinity by rushing to see who can protect and serve women most effectively!

I lol at memes like this. The watermark says "Men United" but it's about threatening little boys with weapons to protect your daughter.

Our culture wars are basically an argument about what values are best for women. But everyone agrees that's what matters most.

Heads, men are disposable. Tails, men are disposable.

”Our culture wars are basically an argument about what values are best for women. But everyone agrees that's what matters most.”

Actually incredibly high IQ comment, this is how all human societies have been for all of time, it's part of our DNA. Even the way Islam treats women is based on the pretense of protecting them from men

I just wish people stopped acting so fucking moralizing about it. Society values women more because they have eggs and a pussy. Okay, fine. Dont act like theyre victims and men are evil and we need to liberate them from oppression and shit when men on average live much harder lives. When for most men, just finding friends and dating options is a struggle if you arent exceptional.

That's the wild thing about gender. Is that we've just completely reversed reality and decided as a culture to feel sorry for the far more privileged group.

Imagine if we grew up constantly being reminded to be nice to the oppressed rich which people. It's fucking insane. Poor people and minorities have it harder but at least everyone knows it. Men have to deal with being treated like shit AND being constantly bombarded with reminders of how lucky we are to be men.

Being a woman will always be easier but it'd be nice to one day live in a world where people notice this and are empathetic to the 80%+ of men for whom things are much harder.

”Lol Asian women are one of the biggest self haters in the fucking world.”

???? have you seen white people?

Arab guy here. True, white people do hate themselves in many ways, but mostly because of some weird collective guilt. But unlike Asian women, white women generally are favorable to white men provided white men are Chads/Chadlite. However, white women are increasingly ditching white men for black men, which is a sexual desire adjacent to bestiality. Like Arab/Middle Eastern women, white women are extremely into big cocks.

Oh I see I am replying to yet another larping male. Fuck off back to your safe spaces you creepy colonizing bastard. Stay the fuck away from ours. You have sfa to contribute. You are not a woman and sure as fuck you're not a feminist.

Social democracy is the “final stop” before full-on fascism. It’s basically a tacit admission by the bourgeoisie that a socialist revolution is drawing near, and they need to appease the workers by whatever means necessary. Social democracy can also exist, feasibly, primarily via imperialism. The reason capitalism is able to provide such a robust welfare state is through the impoverishment and ruin of other countries. As I understand it, it is for these reasons that Stalin (correctly) calls social democracy “objectively the moderate wing of fascism.”

Hey dumbshit. How am I sexist for addressing the biological reality that girls prefer to play with dolls and boys prefer to play with trucks? Sorry you hate science or that gendersex is a binary that largely dictates much of behavioral reality. I don't give a fuck about your anecdotal life evidence. No one does. You don't even know what a regressive means because you ARE a literal regressive. Pathetic. Gender and sex were synonymous for most of history until redefined by a feminist asshat professor in the late 60s. We're reclaiming it. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gendersex

This way to Clown World!

image

[Image shows Honkler the Nazi clown frog riding in a mine cart down a slippery slope with NPCs inside it crying “Racist!”, “Slippery Slope Fallacy!”, “Bigot!”, and “Evil Frog!”. The slope is labeled in descending order:

1. Let us marry each other in peace
2. Accept me for who I am
3. Disagreement is hate speech
4. LGBTQ+ Pride Month
5. Bake my cake, bigot!
6. Dildo parades in public
7. Diversity is our strength
8. Desmond is Amazing!
9. Pedo-drag storytime!
10. Wax my balls, bigot!
11. Pedophilia is a sexual orientation
12. Teach 5th Graders Masturbation
13. Teach 6year olds self-touching

At the bottom of the slope is Hillary Clinton photoshopped as a demon sucking out a baby’s soul. There is also a (most likely fake) MailOnline article with the header “Children as young as SIX are to be given compulsory self-touching Lessons that critics say are sexualizing youngsters”.]

You would not believe me if I told you this.

I was feeling particularly suicidal tonight, so I figured, fuck it, I'm gonna call the Suicide Hotline and just vent.

According to their website, 97% of calls are answered within 75 seconds.

Guess how long I waited for? Just take a guess. Got your guess in your head? Okay? Ready?

I WAITED FOR 11 MINUTES AND NO ONE PICKED UP. 11 FUCKING MINUTES LMFAOOOO.

11 MINUTES

I LITERALLY HUNG UP AND CALLED AGAIN AND WAITED FOR ANOTHER 4 MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS BEFORE HANGING UP AND LAUGHING AT HOW PATHETIC THIS WORLD IS.

I waited a total of nearly 15 minutes on the phone and no one even fucking picked up.

I made a r/SuicideWatch post earlier today and someone literally commented "Oh good! :)" on my post before I deleted it.

ahahaha.

I am 1000% convinced everything is fake. Everyone is acting. I live in a simulation. This is actually all fake. Everything is actually fake.

I feel like I'm being driven to madness. I genuinely feel completely insane. It's such a life-changing realization. Nothing is actually fucking real.

You are treated the way you are treated by design. If any of you even are real. For all I know, I'm the only actual real person in this simulation and "incels" have just been created by some supercomputer AI that I'm plugged into.

I've ran numbers and I've studied high levels of statistics. So much of the shit that happens to me shouldn't be statistically possible. My life genuinely feels like a movie. Everything just feels so artificial and fake.

Everything feels like The Truman Show.

I'm done playing by the rules.

I'm done being toyed with and played with like a fucking animal. If you are in on this and you're not NPC's or AI designed specifically to accommodate to me, then fuck you.

I've been Neuro Typical my entire life and I've never had signs of autism or other mental disorders or learning disabilities. Yet, I'm still somehow going mad. I feel like Russel Crowe's character, Steve Nash, in A Beautiful Mind. Everything feels like it's collapsing suddenly. Everything, every single day, it just keeps getting worse.

I'm going to free myself from this fucking hell and I hope all of you do the same if you're really here with me.

Bless you all.

[ATOMIC BLACKPILL/SUIFUEL] Stop posting about the dream of "holding hands" and "cuddling" - women don't give a fuck about that

Yep, you read it right. Women don't give a fuck about being romantic. While you dream of holding hands and being all cute with a girl, they watch literal RAPE porn (uni classmate girl told me she watches it, so does her girl friends). They love it, it's their fetish to get fucked hard, used and abused, a literal cumdumpster. Do you know that "female friendly" porn section? JFL only numale wankers watch that shit.

STOP DREAMING ABOUT WOMEN BEING CUTE AND ROMANTIC. THEY'RE ANIMALS THAT WANT TO GET FUCKED REALLY HARD, NOT CUDDLE. REMEMBER: AWALT

Re: Manlet’s GF photoshops him to a taller height to increase her social media presence. Even if you ascend they’re ashamed of you.

image

My girlfriend [M29 F29] photoshopped a picture to make me look taller.

Basically what's in the title. But I can give some background info: my girlfriend and I have been going out for 2 years now. I'm 5'6" and she's 5'4". It's honestly been an amazing relationship from my perspective, she's my first real girlfriend and sex partner so perhaps I am biased but I have been very happy with her. She has been with a good number of guys before and it used to give me some anxiety because they were all tall (6'2'lish, approx. by their photos) and handsome, but she kept reassuring me that my height doesn't matter to her and she's matured past the point where she cares about that superficial stuff. So I got over it. And our romantic life is great, she's never given me a reason to doubt her love for me.

Men are honestly more like human trophies to modern empowered females than we are fellow human beings to them. They dont actually value us as people, they primarily value us for the feelings of social status security they feel we can offer them.

Women's increasing, hypergamy motivated height fetish proves this all too well. Tall man = Big trophy as far as they are concerned; Having a taller man than other women literally makes a lot of females feel superior and good about themselves. Guy in the post isn’t tall enough to make her look good, so she feels so insecure about this she edits him in pictures. She wants, needs a taller trophy to show off in order to feel secure with herself.

High IQ. Hardest blackpill for me.

Same. Female romantic love is a profitable myth. They never love the man, only what he does for them and when he makes them look good. We are honestly just social status objects to them: the security they feel they get for being with a guy is what mostly determines their feelings for him.

That’s why a man’s height or money are more important than who or how he is as a human being for an insane amount of them. The same men who are desperate to believe in the fantasy that is female romantic love are the same ones who stupidly refuse to recognize the completely obvious fact that the main way men have always competed for women is through signaling material and social status.

F29 and pictures of past boyfriends that mog him.

She got the wall and is need of betabuxx. Either he’s cool with being the bail out or he’s completely clueless.

He’s clueless, like most short or ugly guys with his level of optimism towards women. He won’t wake up to the truth until he gets hurt bad enough. Already starting to happen to him.

I think he feels something is amiss since he’s posting on that sub. Too bad nobody there is gonna drop the black pill on him

Even if they did he probably still wouldnt accept it. He’s gotta learn the hard way for himself, like most guys. We all start off blue pilled, we are raised to be, but on top of this we are also taught to invest our sense of self worth as men into our ability and willingness to keep women on a pedestal. Some guys get treated like shit by women for their whole life and still never figure it out, because they’d basically hate themselves just for being seriously critical of women at all.

Things are only changing today because the internet is allowing males to come together and share information, but for a lot of guys this still isn’t enough, they gotta get hurt real bad multiple times before they are able to consider taking women off that pedestal in their minds.

So I basically live under a rock, meaning I don't watch news and am not up to date on current events and politics, and have no friends to discuss things with. I'm not sure if what I'm about to write is in any way accurate or if I'm missing some big piece of the puzzle, so please feel free to correct me or enlighten me as you see fit (but please be nice!).

But even as far removed as I am, I am noticing that the 2 major political groups in the US have both adopted policies that are/will a have far reaching, negative impact on women's rights.

On the left we have the trans activists erasing women's biology, rights and spaces, and on the right we have the abortion abolishonists and Christian family hierarchy upholders, with the husband as the front and center, ruler of his domain, threatening female bodily autonomy.

Both are seriously detrimental to women's rights and advancements and it's starting to scare me. It seems like a huge deal to me but it doesn't seem to even be a topic of discussion outside of radfem spaces... I almost feel like it should be a topic for r/conspiracy TBH.

Historically, these 2 parties (Democrats and Republicans) have always held the majority votes. So it seems like regardless of the results of the 2020 election, women are just fucked?

Am I missing something here? How is no one seeing this as a calculated attack on women? Or even considering it questionable?

I'm at the point where I'm just baffled by the fact that people don't even acknowledge women's suffrage and the continuous threat and discrimination we face. People are denying that sexism and the gender wage gap even exist. Is this gaslighting on a major scale or am I just crazy? Lol.

I guess I just feel lost and alone and would really like some input from people I feel safe around and I'm thinking that's this subreddit.

(AdAstra9191)

Why the hell is cheating, pornography and infidelity normalized these days?

I’ve been noticing that in mainstream culture there are a lot of dumb ass excuses made up for why men in relationships get to cheat, ogle other women when they are already in a relationship, use pornography, etc etc, and most of these excuses are made up by men and the dumb women that enable their behavior. I’ve read some articles online on why cheating, ogling and watching porn is “normal male behavior” and in the comment section I’ll see pick-me bitches coddling their boyfriends’ ridiculous behavior. They’ll say, “Oh you women complaining about your man ogling other women are so insecure. It’s normal for a man to do that. When I see a hot woman in the street I will actively point out a hot woman to my boyfriend and ask him to check her out.” It sounds like these women are suffering from some kind of Stockholm Syndrome or masochistic tendencies or something. Who in their right mind would want a man who emotionally abuses them by cheating on them and lusting after other women?

It is like we are living in some kind of apocalyptic age of shitty men everywhere that have rampant sex addiction and narcissism. What is happening to the human race today?

(Animal_testing_lab)

Its is bc of the shift in who controls relationships now. Men are now in control of sex/relationships, no matter what they say, you can see it all around you. Girls want to be in relationships and men want sex. Period. It's very cut and dry. Once we girls handed them the keys to all the free sex they wanted, they changed the rules up on us. Now we have to play by they're rules. We have to accept the porn, bc if we want a relationship, we have to play by their rules. We have to accept the other girls bc if we want any of them to want us we have to play the game by their rules. Ik it sucks, but thats just the way it is. And if one girl decides to stand up for herself in order go get free from this strange place that leads to nothing she wants, she will be called a prude, and stuck up, and cast away for another girl who is will to give herself away for nothing and that girl will, be left alone.

I, like many people my age grew up online, spending dozens of hours a week glued to my computer and phone. I spent a chunk of that time on twitter and tumblr, two TRA social justice strongholds since about 2012. And the TRA dogma has been so prevalent in my upbringing online that their terminology, gaslighting, malicious manipulation and just straight up lunacy is almost... normal to me.

I grew up hearing that lesbians need to unlearn their genital fetish or they’re bad people. I grew up hearing that “TERFs” are an evil subhuman sect of the population that deserves only the worst because their thoughts and words “literally kill trans women”.* I grew up being taught to never doubt that trans women are women and trans men are men, full stop. That I couldn’t even call them their correct sex because that would be literal violence. It’s horrifying that they have fostered an environment on these huge platforms (with many minors and impressionable young people) where there’s a constant threat of trans suicide, being ostracized by society and being considered a bad person if you don’t comply with the TRA ideology without criticism, without question and dissent? Dissent is not even an option for us. And... ugh. This was all on websites I used from age 13 til now, as a 21 year old. Surrounded by friends of the same age. Having our environment flooded with this fuckery, and our minds bent by malicious adult TRAs to submit to them accept these harmful lies.

I’m envious of older gender critical thinkers I’ve seen here on reddit who got to grow up normal, and not be exposed to all this and thus have an easier time smelling the bullshit and being critical.

After all though, I’m better off than some my peers. Despite being surrounded by it all I’ve always been more resistant and less into the TRA’s schtick. I never self described as cis, never put pronouns in my bios, never questioned my “gender identity”, hell I never thought much of it at all. Like I don’t even have one I’m just female. On the other hand though I have had many friends and knew tons of people who drank the TRA kool-aid, bottoms up with not a drop to spare. Every single one of them is suffering and mentally ill in some way, desperately in need of a positive life change and real help and coping skills, but what they got instead was all they knew. Fuck the trans cult.

*(It’s honestly jarring how much emphasis they have on hating feminists and lesbians but generally ignore misogynistic/oppressive men. And how there is no equivalent for the whole anti terf phenomenon for trans men. Reflecting on this was my peak trans moment.)

I could go more into it all but I’m tired atm. Sorry this is barely readable lol just wanted to get my thoughts out there and maybe others will feel the same and even if not, I’m interested to hear your opinion on what I’m thinking.

Why women are incapable to lead men, corporations and turn into tyrants.

The reason why women are tyrants is because they have authority without responsibility. It's inherent that they are incapable of taking responsibility for their actions. Therefore women with any authority or power will be tyrants. Give a 12 year old girl power over you and see how that ends. Just look at spoiled children how they behave. Women are children, they stop developing physically at 16 and mentally between the start and end of puberty. Ask yourself what a child will do and you will start to read women like a book.

There are some exceptions however and that is women at the very end of the bell curve with extreme male brains and high IQ. They develop some characteristics of men but the vast majority of them are not interested in men, but either other women or asexual.

A good example of this is Lisa Su, the CEO of AMD. Sure, gotten alot of credit for shit she hasn't done but to be frank, she's one of the most successful CEOs at this time. Doesn't mean that she is as capable as a man, just that she is one in a 1000 with extreme male brain. I don't think she has children, but she does have a husband. This doesn't make her a nawalt however, she just inherited by mutation some features of men.

Men are capable of ruling and being kings, women always are either controlled heavily by counsel or turn to tyrants.

This is why women shouldn't vote or have anything to do with politics, and certainly not rule. Womens only purpose in life has always been to bear children, take care of infants and toddlers to the age of 5 and do monotonous tasks such as sewing or picking berries. Ever wondered why women are obsessed with monotonous tasks such as sewing, crosswords and the like? Because they evolved to.

Women were made for making babies and taking care of the helpless and men were made to do EVERYTHING else, that is why women are only good at things that are correlated with child birth, flexibility being one of them. Another one is distinguishing color, which was helpful for finding and picking berries and the like in the hunting gathering phase of humanity (this is the only thing that isn't directly correlated to child birth that I can think of).

Women are inferior to men, but hating them for simply being children is silly. Most people that are angry and in the redpill rage stage have been lied to and their ideas doesn't correlate with reality. Women, like children, should be taken care of, but in the current climate the state does that for us through our money and crucify men so we're incapable of doing our jobs without putting our lives on the line. This doesn't benefit men nor women, but women are the majority of voters and very short sighted and this cannot end until men take womens rights away or they lose them naturally when we run out of money.

Not much new here, but had to gather my thoughts and see if I missed something. Hopefully this helps someone out there.

It's a rough life out there, take care.

We're called toxic because we call bullshit out and dont bow down to men, so of COURSE it's toxic. 🙄 Also we're "twansphobic" because we know that penis creatures can't be women.

Trans identifiers who claim to be homosexual on the basis of the sex they identify with are immaturely and pathologically focused on physical attributes at the expense of the substance of homosexuality.

Through spreading rhetoric of "genital preference", they're regressing the public debate back to a time when society framed the nature of our relationships only in shallow terms of sexual activity. It's a manipulative misappropriation of public sentiment via a childish form of retribution for an apparent lack of self esteem. What's most insidious is how their tactic sows confusion, misunderstanding, and self-doubt around the nature of our sexuality among naive homosexuals.

How many of us homosexuals have put much thought into considering what it truly means to be oriented to intimacy with a partner of the same sex?

I see the fundamental essence of homosexual attraction as an emotional connectivity with one other's biological sameness. External body parts and secondary sex characteristics merely touch the easily observable surface, but since that's the maximum extent by which a heterosexual trans identifier can relate, they are limited to a superficial and inadequate set of assumptions about the nature of homosexual orientation, much less heterosexual orientation. It's ignorance. Our easily manipulated gay brothers and lesbian sisters are also ignorant. Their minds are so consumed by underclass ideology that they've no capacity left for realizing that the alphabet diversity game is stripping us of our shared yet individually born identities.

Attraction to same sex physical features are an outer layer of our sexuality whereas desiring same sex romantic intimacy is fulfilling an innate psychological impulse to be unified with the same sex. Only same sex partners can provide the necessary relativity to each other's mutual homosexual desire. The same applies to heterosexuality in the inverse. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are opposite sides of a complex coin. It would be far more appropriate to place those two phenomena in a box together than it is to group either with sex identification. Gender theory further distorts and unnecessarily complicates the distinction.

Trans identifiers are at most a novelty in terms of sexual experience. It doesn't matter much that they approximate the look of the other sex. In the end, the state of knowing that person is biologically the same forms the fundamental basis of an emotional connection with a same sex partner.

Hopefully a silver lining to the the rise in trans theory lunacy is that it will catalyze more of us to better understand what defines our sexuality, thereby helping truth to ultimately contain this public mental health crisis.

You know what’s also found in 1500 different species? Cannibalism! Many animals eat their own kind for many different reasons however they all ensure animals are well fed. However as humans we are above animals. The majority if us are civilized and have decency (Well it’s more of a minority nowadays but you get the point) because of this we do not resort to eating our deceased friends and family unless under severe circumstances. Just because animals do something primitive and repulsive doesn’t mean we have to lower ourselves down to their level and do it as well.

Theory: Major Factions of TPTB have been at war for the past few years and that’s why we’re seeing so much come to light, spiritual awakenings, glitches in the matrix, etc.

Say what you will about the current USA prez, but my theory is that he (wittingly or unwittingly) was the catalyst for one faction of TPTB to try and wrest control from the other. Most of us believe this group runs the world through manipulation, disgusting blackmail scams, central banks, cruelty, and possibly worship of evil spirits. But why is it assumed these bastards always march in lockstep? These are the most depraved sociopaths on the planet. There has to be infighting, backstabbing, and scheming.

I’ve seen a lot of posts recently regarding spiritual awakenings, noticing that the “system” of infotainment and fake news propaganda is getting stale and repetitive as fuck lately. We have posts where the elite’s occult symbolism is dead smack in your face. Their sex predators are getting exposed and the deaths surrounding same (Epstein, that Kevin Spacey accuser) are such blatantly obvious cover-ups it’s ridiculous.

So my theory is that the last prez election in the US gave one faction an opening to try and take down the other, and the two sides have been furiously at war ever since. They likely follow a certain code or set of rules for this sort of thing so it all doesn’t collapse, but it seems like they as a group have gotten sloppy as fuck lately, and they seem to be losing their discipline.

And to those who believe that the elite are controlled/assisted by evil spirits, that we live in the Matrix or other type of soul trap, doesn’t it seem like the “glitches” are getting more frequent and obvious? Like the idea that the material universe as an elaborate sham seems more readily apparent?

Thoughts?

Is the name "reverse mathematics" uninformative and relativistic?

angels can grasp truth immediately and luminously without syllogisms or ratiocinations (summa theologiae prima pars, question 58). So for an angel, doing human mathematics would be "reverse mathematics", finding whether a truth is provable in a system accessible to mere mortals like ZFC. So it seems like the term reverse mathematics is either endorsing relativism or denying the existence of angels. I suggest an alternative name would increase interest and avoid these errors.

Roasties hate gun rights because they level the playing field for self defense

In the ideal world for roasties, Chad is able to beat you up, torture you, kill you even, at any time and for any reason. Thinking about Chad killing an incel gets them wet.

So roasties hate gun rights as a group because it means chad cant arbitrarily dominate you any more

I live in a country where guns and any sort of self defense weapon are banned. The end result is that large areas of cities are dominated by gangs of knife wielding and bottle-acid throwing thugs. Men hate this but women love it because they get off on the idea of being ravished by a violent thug.

Never give up your rights to self defense or you'll end up like my country: a chad boot stomping on an incel head, forever.

Ps I'm not advocating any sort of violence but self defense is always justified if you're being attacked. In my country self defense is practically illegal

Animal worship - veganism

So, as far as you’ve might know, tumblr used to be a battleground for discourse some time ago, and i believe it still is, but long time ago there was some proeminent TRA who were CIA agents, and also russian infiltrated activists spreading messages contrary to those discourse. The thing is, wtf was happening that time? I’ve even got an email saying “tumblr had deleted some posts that you shared because of infiltrated russian agent spreading stuff”. Does anybody remember that? Isn’t TRA still under cia propaganda? I think it was like 2017 or 2016. When i received that email that shit freaked me out so i’ve backed on feminist activism even. I’m using my secondary account to post here, since I’m a public person and don’t want any politic posts attached to my name. Edit: here’s the transcript of the email tumblr has sent me:

Dear (my blog), As part of our commitment to transparency, we want you to know that we uncovered and terminated 84 accounts linked to Internet Research Agency or IRA (a group closely tied to the the Russian government) posing as members of the Tumblr community. The IRA engages in electronic disinformation and propaganda campaigns around the world using phony social media accounts. When we uncovered these accounts, we notified law enforcement, terminated the accounts, and deleted their original posts. While investigating their activity on Tumblr, we discovered that you either followed one of these accounts linked to the IRA, or liked or reblogged one of their posts: 1-800-gloup bellaxiao previously known as: blogmadworldlove bellygangstaboo cartnsncreal previously known as: feelmydragonballs destinyrush previously known as: delightfullyghostlysong gogomrbrown previously known as: go-mrbrown, infectedv0ice, todd-la-death honestlyyoungpersona lagonegirl massmedear previously known as: massblog021 mooseblogtimes morningwoodz previously known as: 5cubes, bangbangempire, empireofweird, gifemprireohh, innerpicsempire, picsempire nevaehtyler previously known as: laserenita noteverythingiswhite previously known as: ashleyfsilver sumchckn previously known as: blondeinpolitics, blvckcommunity, classylgbthomie, hwuudoin, politixblondie swagintherain previously known as: blacklivesmatterusa, carzwithgirlz thetrippytrip previously known as: matrixpath, themostpost thingstolovefor previously known as: the-inner-mirror You aren’t in trouble, and don’t need to take any action if you don’t want to. We deleted the accounts but decided to leave up any reblog chains so that you can curate your own Tumblr to reflect your own personal views and perspectives. Democracy requires transparency and an informed electorate and we take our disclosure responsibility very seriously. We’ll be aggressively watching for disinformation campaigns in the future, take the appropriate action, and make sure you know about it. — Tumblr Tumblr 35 East 21st St, Ground Floor. New York, NY 10010. Email settings

Trans rights are human rights because men are human. Trans rights come at the expense of women’s rights because women are not considered human.

I like to ask them when they say this: what rights are you missing that we have to fight for?

Re: The hypothesis stating that females with borderline personality disorder represent an extreme form of female-typical behavior has been informally suggested following Baron-Cohen’s Extreme Male Brain theory of autism.

(Jeffrey23a)

So typicall female behavior is falling easily in love and creating strong emotional connections. And when they get angry they are second to the devil.

Women only fall in love easily with attractive men. They almost never fall in love with low-status, unattractive men.

Women's biological imperative is to extract as many resources as possible from men for themselves and for their offspring. That is why women are so materialistic, selfish, and manipulative. Women's love tends to be conditional, pragmatical and self-interested. Men's love tends to be unconditional and sacrificial. Women often divorce or break-up with their partners as soon as a better option presents itself. If BPD is an extreme form of female-typical behavior, one would expect these tendencies to be even more pronounced in women diagnosed with the disorder.

(SophisticatedBean)

Yeah, Baron-Cohen's E-S theory is bluepilled.

BPD and especially histrionic disorder are overwhelmingly female disorders, but not because they maximize empathy. Women are actually not much more empathetic, if at all (think intrasexual competition and how they opportunistically switch mates). All their emotions are simply more extroverted in a childish manner. Their caring obsession with children is completely misleading. The extremes of both sexes have low empathy which makes sense in a world of limited resources where species are selected to selfishly maximize their reproductive success. It's different kinds of psychopathy though: Gossipy/hysterical intrasexual competition etc. vs ruthless dominance.

Systemizing is better, but this also does not delineate casual pondering ("omg I love science!!") from deep status-driven thought.