my brother's wife has a brother whose gay, and he and his boyfriend came for my nephews birthday party. i was upset when i saw they had been aloud to adopt two little boys. one of the men changed one of the boys diapers, and he actually touched the boys penis when putting on the lotion. that was not needed he should have put on rubber gloves or something. it must be terrible for those kids to have gay men touching their privates. i wouldn't be surprised if later they're arrested for molestation
61 comments
Yeah, right, cause I always put rubber gloves on before I touched my son's penis when he was a baby. It just makes sense, right?
it must be terrible for those kids to have gay men touching their privates.
Why would it be any different than having their straight mother touching their privates? Or a straight father touching his infant daughter's privates? Olivery2k apparently doesn't know that you have to clean a baby before you can put on a new diaper.
And how is that different from a grown woman "touching their privates" while changing their diapers and applying lotion or powder?
By your logic, their mother would probably be arrested from molestation later on.
*eyeroll*
Would they be so upset if a heterosexual man's hand came into contact with his daughter's genitalia while he was changing her?
I mean, wow. Breaking news: Gay man touches a baby's anus! (while wiping his son's bottom)
Yes...they are obviously trying to molest the infant child. Run, run for the hills! Tell them of their terrible application of lotion! Warn them of the blatant refusal to use rubber gloves! Inform the masses before it is too late!
Edit: I'm wonderng why exactly this person was so fixated on the details of a baby being changed, and on the baby's penis...repressed urges, mayhaps?
And why is this done? I mean, it is mutilation. And no. There is no good medical reason for it. That one has been laughed out of court a long time ago. It's done simply because it's mutilation.
Any person properly cleaning a child will perforce clean the genital areas. That involves touching. It's just your evil mind that sees evil in an innocent act. You are sick. And you tell us more about yourself than about the two gay men.
All of the above comments that question why olivery2k didn't say anything about heterosexual daddies touching their babies' privates during diaper changes - you're overlooking one fact: Fundie men do NOT change diapers. Ever. In their world, that's women's work, as is anything shitty and distasteful.
Yes! This is exactly how the Gay Agenda works! By mere act of changing their diapers, today's children will be the recruits for tomorrows "Rainbow Contingent".
Who is the pervert here, someone who is merely changing a diaper, or someone who thinks about kiddie-fiddling when they see someone else changing a diaper? Can you answer that question, Olivery2k?
I really feel sorry for olivery2k's children, if he or she has them. Their parent obviously never took care of them as babies.
And if he/she doesn't have kids, I urge them not to reproduce.
So do paediatricians. And men are not allowed to change diapers?
Contrary to all belief, gay men don't like at penis and think "sex". Just like straight men can look at breasts and keep their mind on their job.
By your logic straight men should never become gynaecologists.
Makes perfect sense to me.
He'd rather the adoptive parent wear latex gloves, so the child's subconscious can start to gain a feeling of being distanced from a young age. Undoubtedly The parents should hug or otherwise touch the child as he grows as well.
This way he can grow feeling like he was unloved and feel resentment to his adoptive parents, which can later be explained to him (them) as being because they were gay and horrible. Thusly transferring the feelings of resentment onto the entire gay community.
Granted, this poor stupid fellow doesn't realize why, but I'm sure somewhere up the chain of brainwash it's all been worked out.
i agree, its fucking horrible.
Let me guess, your on the phone to child services on a weekly basis to turn them in for such evils as wiping the babies bottom? I know fundie men don't change diapers, but can you logically explain how else he was supposed to get the lotion onto the baby without touching him? Whats next, he's going to hug the child? Kiss it? The pervert!
Not like a good fundie who just beats his kids into submission.
I was upset when I saw that you were allowed to get away with spellings like "aloud".
Also, n the words of Strong Bad: "Whatever happened to capitalisation? It used to be so coooool!"
And the rest is bigoted and/or idiotic.
So... When a hetero dad rubs lotion on a baby boy's privates or wipes his butt, does that make him a pedo? Does he have to wear rubber gloves, too?
Why was this woman watching a guy tending to a baby's privates, anyway? Is she that paranoid she has to stare at a diaper changing to see if the big bad homo is going to molest the baby? Sicko...
Imagine that, a responsible parent who's not allowing his child to sit in its own filth.
Really, I ... ugh.
olivery2k, please change a couple thousand diapers, and you'll see why (gasp!) some guy's hand happened to come in contact with his son's genitals. It is not, and has never been, OMG SHOCKING NEWS.
Yep, cause if I had a son, and I was going to molest him, i'd choose to do in public at birthday party.
Presumably the sensible thing for these men to do when bathing their son is to leave him in the bath unsupervised? God forbid they should watch the kid naked, or soap him down and inflict more horrible gay touching on this nether regions.
What if this good, responsible father had given his son a raspberry after wiping away the poop/pee? You know, that bubbly blow-on-the-tummy thing that kiddies love and it makes them giggle and helps them bond with the parents? 10:1 she would be been on the phone to the cops.
Well if he didn't put the lotion on the skin the baby would get the hose again....
Some people are stupid, has this dude not changed his own son's (if he has one?!) diaper?
When changing a diaper, you need to properly clean the baby. That involves touching their genitals. It's part of good parenting. Only a fundie would read molestation into that. If the man had been married to a woman, olivery2k wouldn't have thought twice about it.
What do you say when a straight woman puts lotion on her son's private parts? What do you say when a straight man puts lotion on his daughter's private parts?
You've got so many levels of fail - not to mention ignorance - there isn't even a place to start.
You have two choices:
I am a gay man. I'm also the uncle of a 4 year-old girl and 3 year-old boy. I babysit them 4-5 times a week. I bathe them, feed them, dress them, read to them, rough-house with them, take them to the park, and play games with them. Sometimes I even have to discipline them. I've naturally had to change them, and even now they sometimes need help in the bathroom department. These things are all part of taking care of children. If you can't grasp that, then I hope you never have any.
Babies need to be wiped, dickweed, not all genital touching is sexual touching.
Even if it were sexual touching, a glove wouldn't make a damn bit of difference there. Wearing a condom before fucking your wife doesn't suddenly stop it from being a sex act, now does it?
my brother's wife has a brother whose gay,
Luke, I am your brother's wife's brother's boyfriend.No! Wait, what?
Anyway, if you can't write properly, don't do it at all. I vomited on the first line alone.
Um, when I changed my son's diaper I had to touch his penis all the time. That's part of changing a fucking diaper, especially if the baby is uncircumcised. I didn't wear gloves. Wow, did I commit incest?
and he actually touched the boys penis when putting on the lotion. that was not needed he should have put on rubber gloves or something
it must be terrible for those kids to have gay men touching their privates.
No, tracer, that makes you a dog molester. To hell with you, degenerate! That dog must sue, even if he claimed to like it at the time...
Back on topic: The only question that comes to mind in this scenario is, "olivery2k, why the f*ck are you watching someone change their child's dirty dipes?" That's none of your biz, you sick twist.
Taking care of your infant's basic hygiene needs is pretty universal for both gay people and heteros alike. Anything else would be child neglect.
That's part of changing a fucking diaper, especially if the baby is uncircumcised. I didn't wear gloves.
Actually, you clean a boy the same way whether he's circumcised or not. The foreskin doesn't retract at that age.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
