imagine if a bunch of men's right advocates crashed some feminist rally and bought a bunch of 300lb UFC fighters with them to teach them not to divorce rape.... how much crying and screaming in the newspapers there would be....
29 comments
"a bunch of men's right advocates crashed some feminist rally and bought a bunch of 300lb UFC fighters with them to teach them not to divorce rape"
Like a bunch of Klansmen attacking a black church during service ca 1960.
'Divorce rape'? Was that supposed to be 'divorce a rapist'?
@ Malingspann
It's a MGTOW buzzword, equating the common meme of "Ex-wife bankrupts the hard working husband with alimony and severance package" with the act of rape, the idea being that men having to pay Alimony is a mental and ethical violation equivalent to rape.
It's despicable, but then so is the manosphere
Terrorism usually gets a lot of "crying and screaming" in the newspapers.
@ Ivurm, thanks for the explanation of "divorce rape".
If they don't like alimony or severance packages, they can always get a prenuptial agreement. Or move to Sweden; here everything is more or less split in two. The one who has the children the most, gets the house, but must compensate the other for it. But, over here they also have to pay Swedish taxes on everything.
...and then Gammapussy woke up with the letters 'R, T, Y, U, F, G, H, J, C, V, B, N' in reverse on his cheek & his keyboard ruined by drool, realised he was back in his mother's basement, and he started crying and screaming...! >:D
@Mister Spak
'Even a ninja can be taken out by a bullet'
-Dr. Masaaki Hatsumi, Grandmaster of Togakure Ryu Ninpo & Ninjutsu.
I'm pretty sure this is a response to female boxers showing up at a pro rape rally. I don't know if that rally was serious; my gut says it was satire, and even in the MRM, most there would not openly support rape.
By contrast, I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't have a pro "unfair divorce proceedings" rally, unless it was satirical, simply because even hardcore feminists don't openly support that sort of thing. Sure, the Big Red crowd might, but they wouldn't call it that.
Why do you need MMA fighters? Why not do the job, yourselves? After all; You're all "Alpha Men O' POWAH!", amirite?
Also; You Male Supremacist boobs complain about how women suck away all your money....YET you refuse to let these women get big careers and make great money on their own! These gals wouldn't be supposedly sucking away your bucks if they had their own, DUMMIES!
I think I know what your deal is. You're only willing to be with women if they were perpetual teenagers who are entirely obedient, never ask for ANYTHING and return and "put out" on your command. Basically, you expect actual human beings with feelings and personalities to suddenly transform into mindless Housecleaning/baby-making/baby-raising/sexbots who do everything while you sit around and eat Cheetos and play Video Games!
Finally; Not all MMA Fighters are clones of that oafish Johnny Poo Krappenthrower guy.
(Apologies to sane, good people who like Video Games and Cheetos. I am a big Cheeto-fan, myself.)
The only crying & screaming would be from you, after said UFC fighters guys refused to have anything to do with any of you, & after the cops were called & you were shot with bean bags.
Perhaps the whole "alimony/support" thing wouldn't even be an issue if women were given equal pay. So again, the little man-children are fighting against themselves & simply aren't smart enough to see it.
Well, seeing how "divorce rape" doesn't exist... your point is kind of moot.
Divorce laws have come a long way towards achieving gender-blind application (not awarding child custody and alimony automatically to the wife, but to whichever spouse provides the majority of the childcare and has sacrificed career potential for the benefit of the marriage/children)
The reason you still see women predominately being awarded custody and, in some cases, alimony (divorce laws have also moved away from awarding alimony at all, or at least for more than a few years) is that women still shoulder a majority of the domestic work in relationships, including child care tasks (in addition to men getting paid more in general)
If MRAs actually wanted to change the results of divorces to be more favorable to men, they'd be advocating that men take a more active role in child care and related domestic tasks *before* the relationship ends. The same judge who is going to award primary parenting time and alimony to a mother who does 80% of the childcare and can only work part time because of it will likely award equal parenting time and no alimony in a case where the parents share the childcare duties 50%-50% and both can work full time because of that.
I get annoyed when people use rape for things that aren't actually rape. Its a provocative word and misuse cheapens it. And it seems now that both sides are guilty of this.
The Crimson Ghost:
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
