I believe it is logical to believe creation since it is based on observations and not untested hypothesis.
20 comments
This one would be so easy to fix, there's not point in doing it.
On a second note, the day you can verify the hypothesis that snakes can talk, please let me know.
Ahahahahahahhaha!!!!
ROTFLMAO
Isn't eye-witness account the least trusted form of evidence in a court procedure?
Evolution is not an utested hypothesis, it's been tested again and again over 150 years, and each time some part of it has been found wrong or untestable it has been removed. I.e. it's getting more and more solid almost every day.
Logic does not require belief. Also, the only observations, worth any consideration whatsoever, are the ones made first-hand, by a person of sound mind and reputable character. Anything less than that would be merely gossip/hearsay/rumor/misinformation or an outright lie, and anyone who falls for it, would be 'gullible' at best.
“I believe it is logical to believe creation since it is based on observations and not untested hypothesis.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
