'[The Theory of Evolution stems from science.']
Only Darwinists believe this. The evidence says the Emperor has no clothes. The textual evidence of the Bible says Darwinian macroevolution beliefs are a penalty from God for denying Him Creator status. The penalty is corroborated by the fact that the ***reason for being*** evidence/intermediacy is entirely missing; IC is a scientific fact; fossil record shows zero signs of species transitioning. These are death blows in the eyes of any non-prejudicial observer. The fact that Darwinism thrives despite its nudity is explained by the penalty.
14 comments
Ever seen a trilobite fossil? Or an amphibian? Thought not, you stupid, stupid fuck...By the way, where in Bloody Hell does the Bible mention Darwinism? The actual Bible I mean, not some 20th century edition printed especially for Fundie parents to indoctrinate their kids.
The empirical evidence says the Emperor has no clothes (i.e. there is no god), yes, but the televangelists say that the clothes are invisible to those who are stupid or incompetent, so everyone in the Ecstasy Tent profess to see the clothes (i.e. see God's Glory).
The Bible doesn't mention any kind of evolution, neither Lamarckian nor Darwinian, neither macro nor micro, as the people who wrote it were not familiar with these concepts. It also doesn't mention heliocentrism, a spherical Earth or the Americas. The four corners of its world are the north-east, north-west, south-east and south-west "corners" of Eurasia-Africa. The most religious and gullible of the ones sailing with the Santa Maria really thought they would sail over the End of the World at any moment.
Every single fossil is a species transitioning, stupid. This is indeed a death blow in the eye of any non-detrimental* observer, and is the reason why "Darwinism", or (as we'd like to call it) "Realism" thrives, despite people refusing to see the nudity of the Bible.
* Perhaps you meant to say non-prejudiced, dearie.
I'm a transitional form between my parents and my children. And my parents were transitional between me and my grandparents. Just keep going back half a million generations. There, NOW you've got it!
That didn't hurt, did it?
“Only Darwinists believe this.”
No one is a Darwinist. it’s not a religion, he’s not a prophet. Only terribly ignorant creationists try to frame the science as a religion.
“The evidence says the Emperor has no clothes.”
Yeah, ever textbook where ‘science’ makes a claim it is followed by a description of ‘how we know.’
“The textual evidence of the Bible says Darwinian macroevolution beliefs are a penalty from God for denying Him Creator status.”
Accepting the evidence for evolution does NOT deny the existence of God. Or his credit as creator. If Genesis is a metaphor about man’s capacity for sin (rather than a historical event) it’s not even in argument with the bible.
“The penalty is corroborated by the fact that the ***reason for being*** evidence/intermediacy is entirely missing;”
Got an English translation of that?
“IC is a scientific fact; fossil record shows zero signs of species transitioning.”
Actually, modern understanding of biology tells us that every single living thing is a transitional organism. Every fossil.
No one looks for ‘missing links’ any more.
“ These are death blows in the eyes of any non-prejudicial observer.”
You’re crowing a victory in a fight you don’t understand.
“ The fact that Darwinism thrives despite its nudity is explained by the penalty.”
And, again,there’s no religion here.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.