The apostate is killed, yea, i rather enjoy it, its better than spending 5 million to jail them for 65 years. Its also Eco-friendly. Dead bodies furtulize the ground. Thus, the more dead bodies, the better the topsoil. Also, it helps stop dissent, people are elss likely to doing what they clearly know is wrong. And heretical/incorrect [same thing pretty much] ideas are less likely to spread. Why do you think muslims were the second longest rule on earth? From 6th century to 1911..thats a pretty long rule. Bested only by the egyptians..but really, it was only because the egyptians were never challanged.
Human rights are a through and through myth. Humans have no say in their rights.
37 comments
"Human rights are a through and through myth. Humans have no say in their rights."
Why do I get the feeling that if this guy were told he's not allowed to suggest killing people for disagreeing with him, he'd immediately start whining about freedom of speech?
"Human rights are a through and through myth. Humans have no say in their rights."
Unless you're a rich, white, straight dude. Then you get to decide everybody's rights for them.
Bad logic, bad ideas, and bad rationalization. We don't need another round of the Inquisition.
Incidentally, yeah, humans *do* have a say in their rights. Unfortunately for them, all you fundies have to do is *look* human to have those rights. And furthermore, as a cat (stuck in a human body!), I must say I rather enjoy my rights!
"unless you're a rich, white, straight dude"
Princess Rot: racist heterophobia will get you nowhere. Drop it.
Says someone who assumes he will be the one deciding who lives and who dies rather than the one being judged.
Why do those who think apostates should be killed assume that their side will decide who the apostates are?
Furtulize?
You are a bit of an idiot, aren't you? It's okay, you can tell the truth, we are on the internet.
"Also, it helps stop dissent, people are elss likely to doing what they clearly know is wrong."
What the hell kind of fantasy land are you living in? Here in the real world it does no such thing.
"And heretical/incorrect [same thing pretty much] ideas are less likely to spread."
That's what the Catholic Church thought a few centuries ago. I don't think it worked quite like they thought it would.
"Why do you think muslims were the second longest rule on earth? From 6th century to 1911..thats a pretty long rule. Bested only by the egyptians..but really, it was only because the egyptians were never challanged."
Never challenged? You know that a good chunk of Egypt was annexed by, I believe, the Hittites for a while there. Not to mention that they were involved in quite a few wars. Oh, and that whole part near the end where they were ruled by the fucking Greeks . Of course, before the Greeks got there they were being ruled by the Assyrians who were then overthrown by the Persians who were running things when Alexander the Great showed up.
Yeah, Egypt was never challenged.
"Human rights are a through and through myth. Humans have no say in their rights."
You scare me. Go away.
'Human rights are a through and through myth. Humans have no say in their rights.'
That means fundy Muslims like you have no say in your 'rights', either. As another poster said you can bet this shithead would be the first to whine about his 'rights' being violated.
You, get off of my internet.
The internet is for porn, not sociopathy.
Well... um... that's... yeah.
You see, this is why I'm such a fan of the Second Amendment. It gives you the ability to protect your human rights from people like this.
"Human rights are a through and through myth"
Human rights are not myths in societies that actually grant people human rights. Societies that don't rely on fear, oppression, and violence to keep things in order (I know, I know...hardly a nation on earth...). You can choose to do away with human rights, but, by doing so, you are more likely to embitter the general populace, to stifle the productivity and happiness of your nation, and to ensure eventual dissent, rather than preventing it.
INFIDEL, n. In New York, one who does not believe in the Christian religion; in Constantinople, one who does.
Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
WTF are you babbling about psycho?
Oh and arcturus? She was speaking truth, not being racist or heterophobic. Unless you can remind me of the last time our society was run by non-white, non-straight, non-male folks?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.