“Truthfully, I think this "straw man" peanut butter argument is still more plausible”
Far as I know, they flood the peanut butter jar with nitrogen or some other inert gas when they seal it, just so that life does NOT develop inside it.
But hey, it’s your thought experiment, of course it will justify everything you believe, right or wrong, with no attention to any details.
“than the geologic column,”
Last i heard, they found it complete in at least six places. What,exactly, do you think ‘plausible’ means?
“Piltdown man,”
A hoax, proven false by scientists.
“Archeoraptor,”
A hoax, proven false almost immediately by scientists.
“Haekel's fake drawings or any number of fraudulent evolutionary proofs.”
If they’re fraudulent, they’re not proofs, are they?
But go ahead and see if you can list some actual evidence, AND show how it’s not useful to establish evolution, rather than just name-dropping where others have done the work for you.
"Peddle your religion somewhere else.”
Meh. This is what the Interweb are for.
“Evolution requires too much faith for me.”
Always gobsmacked by people who don’t really know what happens when they throw the light switch in the living room,but feel confident to grade the best work of some of the smartest people…
