It's obvious that when liberals can't come up with a coherent rebuttal, they resort to calling their opponents "trolls."
Whose irrelevant - certainly incoherent, nay, RW-trolling - 'essays' were removed from RationalWiki, little Jimmy Wilcum: thus resorting to starting your own pissant little 'Wiki', a la Andy Schaftafly & his Conservapoodia...?!
It's obvious you're a Hypocrite. Certainly not self-aware.
You wouldn't have thought of what you have said if you were.
Oh, and this is rich:
Would you please stop removing comments?--JorisEnter (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
I was the author of the comment, and it was meant to be a joke at the time based on accusations from the denizens of that site, and now can be construed as serious out of context. It is obvious that inept leadership and wishy-washy "conservatism" is what destroyed the site
--Elvis is King (talk) 21:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
That alone has destroyed your credibility. [/Matthew 23: 13-32] As if that wasn't enough:
Inserting "Trump 2016" instead of an actual edit summary into the edit summary field of every edit you make will be considered spam. We all know you like the Trumpster already no need for you to get yourself vandal binned because you won't stop spamming that fact. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Are you denying the unmistakable truth that Donald J. Trump was chosen by God to save this country from Marxism and sexual immorality?
--Elvis is King (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Your 'Emprah'... save your country from immorality...?!:
Trump, in a 2005 conversation with a television host that was caught on a live microphone, describes a failed seduction, saying: “I did try and fuck her, she was married,” and says that when he meets beautiful women he feels able to “grab them by the pussy”.
Oh no more, please Mr. Wilde, I am bereft of ribs! [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]
Stop that, now. Christopher (talk) 18:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I was removing childish vandalism.
--Elvis is King (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
No, you weren't. Christopher (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
A 'speck' in our eyes? That Giant Sequoia in yours.
The 'A response to the latest actions' section of Jimmy's talk page linked above is the cherry on his two-facedness cake. I'll let you good FSTDTers experience the hypocrisy so hideous in it's David J. Stewart-osity, you'll have to shower for a week to purge yourself of the vile filth his mere words represent.
wishy-washy "conservatism" is what destroyed the site
The 'wishy-washy 'Episcopal' clergy in the House of Lords rethought their approval of homosexuality: thus the 2013 Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act (PROTIP: Romans 13:1-5).
The Church of England still exists in 2017.
Reduced to non-sequiturs to disguise your own hypocrisy, it's obvious that when hypocrites can't come up with a coherent rebuttal, that's all they have left, thus you cannot spell 'right-wing Fundamentalist Christain' without the word Mental. But then, I expose your own hypocrisy - and therefore also your mental handicap - via a non-sequitur (only, not). Further emph-ass-ised by this; if it pleases the court, I would like to submit Exhibit A:
using scantily clad women
...and if that is the best that a right-winger can come up with - therefore proving your own hypocrisy: in more ways than one; your well-known Taylor Swift obsession* bordering on Fetish - as a 'defence', then considering the evidence of the above screencap of your said pissant little 'Wiki', there is only one thing I can say:
The prosecution rests.
*- Otherwise, you'll never so much as think of mentioning her again. On you pissant little 'Wiki' or anywhere else: least of all on the internet, including here.
Because you wouldn't want to prove you're a hyper-hypocrite, therefore Hypocrisy is hardwired into the DNA of all right-wingers, by you mentioning her name again: Ever.
Don't forget, Jimbo: FSTDT's servers - and it's users - have long memories. The challenge starts now. Your call.