Cat's Paw #fundie

Cat's Paw #fundie sluthate.com

Laws that would benefit incels

Legalize prostitution.

Stop subsidizing abortion and birth control.

Ban abortion except when it threatens the life or health of the mother, rape, incest, or fetal defect.

Abolish privacy laws. Women should not have the right to sue people who redistribute their slutty photos.

Abolish defamation laws that makes slut-shaming illegal and abortion-shaming illegal.

Abolish medical privacy laws that protect the knowledge of a woman's abortions or birth control medications. Taxpayers subsidize abortion and birth control so they have the right to know which women use those services.

Legalize discrimination against sluts, against women who is on birth control and against women who has had or is planning to have an abortion.

Make adultery and premarital sex illegal.

End alimony.

End the welfare state that makes women dependent on the state rather than letting men provide for them.

Make paternalist testing mandatory.

Outlaw all material (including TV shows and music) encouraging promiscuity.

Censor feminism and anything that is pro-abortion.

Ban all women from voting.

Outlaw all tattoos, "emo haircuts", immodest clothing, and anything that is contrary to monogamous culture.

Ban women from working. All women should stay at home to support their husbands and children.

71 comments

old comment by

So... prostitution would be legal but premarital sex would be illegal. So a prostitute would have to marry every single one of her johns and then divorce them (expecting no alimony, of course) before moving on to the next. Or are these male prostitutes? If women are banned from working, and "All women should stay at home to support their husbands and children", then they couldn't work as prostitutes. All prostitutes would have to be men.

So is Cat's Paw recommending a world in which men and women get married but they also have sex with male prostitutes for some reason?

No, that doesn't make sense either since both premarital sex and adultery would be illegal.

Also, one of the proposed laws is to end the subsidization of abortion and birth control. But then the supposed justification of another of the laws is that information about abortion and birth control should be available publically because these things are publically subsidized.

And I'm pretty sure defamation laws prevent people from saying/printing detrimental things about you that are untrue. So is he arguing that it should be legal to slut shame women when the claim is completely false? And to shame women about abortions who have never had abortions? Is that a thing?

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm finding these proposals impractical and contradictory!

P.S. I'm fairly sure he means 'paternity' rather than 'paternalist'.

old comment by Doubting Thomas

Or, you could quit being a creepy douchebag, improve your personal appearance & grooming, start treating women like human beings and not sex toys, and maybe have the chance to get laid, if not into a meaningful relationship.

I don't get the "Stop subsidizing abortion and birth control" and "ban abortion," unless they think that more babies being born means more potential women later, or *shudder* little girls for them to want to have sex with. But removing women's reproductive freedom is going to result in women being less eager for sex.

I also don't get "Make adultery and premarital sex illegal." Here's a bunch of guys whining about not getting laid, and they want to make it illegal so they'll have no chance? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

old comment by

Taxpayers DO NOT "subsidize abortion", thanks to the Hyde Amendment, which has discriminated against women since 1976 by prohibiting Medicaid, Medicare, military insurance, and all other taxpayer funded health plans from from covering abortion services. It's the only medical procedure so excluded from coverage. So, you'll be happy to know that your wish for women to be treated like second class citizens under the law has already been granted.

As for your bizarre idea that you have a right to know who gets birth control because taxpayer funded insurance programs cover it, that would mean that every other medication and treatment would be equally subject to databases open to public scrutiny, since all are paid for in the same way that birth control is. Which means that we'd get to see how much Viagra you're taking, and why.

old comment by

The first one and the one about paternity testing sound good. The rest is garbage.

To be fair; I'm biased. I have a cousin who grew up without her father because of a baby issue. Her parents divorced. Her mom moved out of state. Her father got a new gf. Her father realized the new gf was trash and was going to move to the same state as my cousin. The new f2f turned up during the moving process, screaming "You can't leave me! I'm pregnant!" They got married for the baby and a few months afterwards the now new wife demanded he cut off all contact with my cousin.

Long story short. We found out during their divorce, and after both children were grown, that the second child wasn't his. Mandatory paternity testing would have helped there.

old comment by Passerby

Well doesn't this shit sound familiar?

How will you have prostitutes if:

Women are banned from sex outside marriage? Although if sex is allowed between marriages but divorce is not how do you imagine your prostitutes will be anything but retirement age widows who would have far more incentive to seek another husband rather than turn tricks?

Women cannot have an occupation i.e. prostitution?

Women cannot use birth control and have no protection from a pregnancy their client is neither obligated or inclined to take responsibility for and no protection from sexually transmitted diseases?

Why would a woman even want to be a prostitute if:

Their standing in society, basic survival, and percieved worth as human beings becomes tied to the acquisition of a husband?

They are relentlesly bombarded with the message that female sexuality is wrong and know that tormenting a sexually active woman will be encouraged?

They have absolutely nothing to gain and everything to lose?

Ultimately what do you imbeciles hope to gain from this? If this shit were implemented and you managed to successfully make yourselves the last resort of the desperate you would just be turning women into the cold, calculating, hateful manipulators looking only for utility in a man you delude yourselves into thinking they are and that competition you think is going on for men more desirable than yourselves based on a numbers game featuring idiotic checklists of shallow and materialistic features that only you use in the first place would become a high stakes bloodbath the most cutthroat of mercenaries would tiptoe around.

And women would still hate you. They'd hate you even more in such a situation since being with you wouldn't be a choice and you have even less to offer them than you do currently. You don't even realize what that means and that's why if you pulled off the impossible to make this nightmarish dystopia your Earthly kingdom you'd be doomed to total destruction. It doesn't matter what extremes you go to in order to suppress dissent you'll be looking at a revolution in short order.

You refuse to address the central issue, that being your fundamental disconnect from the nature of a relationship outside of two people being physically together performing specific sets of tasks.

Even if you get what you think you want you will not be happy. Honestly now, do you think the rest of us men are just secretly miserable with our lives and intent on spiting the only ones who man up enough to whine about the secret superpowered cabal of women who decide who does and does not get laid? That we lie about our happiness? Our stable, faithful marriages and families? Our ability to cope with rejection? The simple fact we are not as utterly consumed by the same goals as you that we would put the rest of our lives on hold?

Take it from someone who has seen family life go horribly wrong and get even worse the harder it tried to look like a family as people like you picture them devoid of emotional investment or deeper understanding, this is not what you want at all. In the end it will make you as glass and as you batter your tiny fists against your misery to keep it at bay you will break into pieces and the family you hoped would make you happy and whole (by beating it into a very specific shape you thought of as normal) will bear the scars. Not that you actually cared about them in the first place. You just needed them to feel like a man because you've yet to figure that out on your own.

old comment by caamib

I would like to congratulate cat's paw on these great suggestions. Of course, none of this is contradictory, unless you're adamant about prostitution being work, but I find that to be a benign, irrelevant mistake. That it is contradictory to retards here is only a sign of how delusional they are. Sex with prostitutes was never considered premarital sex the same way sex with sluts was. Women wouldn't want less sex in such a society, they'd just want in marriages with decent men and not with a very limited percentage of Chads and morons. As for you, Kadorhal, you're just showing how demented you are. Access to marriage and sex is approximately the point of human lives.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

I would like to congratulate Cubanodun ( https://kiwifar.ms/threads/marijan-%C5%A0ikli%C4%87-thatincelblogger-3-fear-and-loathing-of-vagina.10483/page-125#post-1166218) and Dynastia (https://kiwifar.ms/threads/marijan-%C5%A0ikli%C4%87-thatincelblogger-3-fear-and-loathing-of-vagina.10483/page-125#post-1166244) on Kiwi Farms for pointing out the fact that Mary Jane Lick Sick is getting his welfare via Croatia's President, Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic: a woman (and a hot MILF, at that!).

That is contradictory to a retard here, and is only a sign of how hypocritical he is.

'Marjan must be extra salty considering he hates countries ruled by womens and now croatia has a sexy milf for president

You are receiving autismbux from feminists marjie are you upset?'

-Cubanodun

old comment by

@ caamib

One: There is nothing remotely benign about anything in this shitshow you "incel" freaks have going.

Two: Semantics nothing, these are the very definitions of words. Why not just admit you don't think shit through instead of going into a series of increasingly ridiculous excuses that always ends up with you making a claim so impossibly absurd that you never live it down.

Three: Even if you got your heads out of the alternate dimensions you've got tucked away in your assholes where the world works based on some alien logic hostile to the reality the rest of us humans here on Earth are used to and tried to set this bullshit up in a manner that somehow technically works despite the contradictions and mutually exclusive initiatives how the hell would you even enforce something so laughably convoluted and easily exploited for purposes contrary to your insane intentions?

The abolition of privacy laws alone would put your dumb ass on a plate and ring the dinner bell for every doxxer who ever had beef with you and since you're a long running griefer butthurt about pretty much fucking everything we might as well just assume that's a list that could be unironically signed "Everybody" in big block letters.

old comment by caamib

"If we incorporate caamib's idea that having sex with prostitutes would not be considered premarital sex nor would it be impeded by a ban on women working... then wouldn't all women just become prostitutes?

Follow my train of thought for a moment: Cat's Paw's proposals make marriage unpleasant for women. "

Yeah, I was amazed by your conclusion that women would just want to become prostitutes and decided to gave you a chance. I tried to follow your thought further but stopped reading when I got to the part where you claim his ideas make marriage uncomfortable.

Somebody who'd say that has no idea how women work. Women just go for what's the current norm in society and feel comfortable when they do that.

Sucking frat cock and being worthless scum isn't the natural state of women, nor is it being good wives and mothers. Women just adjust to what's popular in society.

old comment by caamib

"Two: Semantics nothing, these are the very definitions of words. Why not just admit you don't think shit through instead of going into a series of increasingly ridiculous excuses that always ends up with you making a claim so impossibly absurd that you never live it down. "

I am still waiting for you to make an argument. So far your only argument is "but prostitutes are also workers and therefore all of your arguments are baaaad!". Ok, I'll give you a chance...

"Three: Even if you got your heads out of the alternate dimensions you've got tucked away in your assholes where the world works based on some alien logic hostile to the reality the rest of us humans here on Earth are used to and tried to set this bullshit up in a manner that somehow technically works despite the contradictions and mutually exclusive initiatives how the hell would you even enforce something so laughably convoluted and easily exploited for purposes contrary to your insane intentions? "

1. How is it convoluted and whatever you say?

2. How it would be enforced? The same way all sane cultures, from Ancient Athens/Rome to early America did. It's pretty easy once people wake up.

"The abolition of privacy laws alone"

Some things I wanted to point out regarding cat paw's suggestions are that some of these would actually be redundant.

If you do the essential things like ban women from voting and working and make adultery and pre-marital sex illegal you would no longer have any need for slut shaming or things like that. Women would just accept a sane culture.

So I am not sure what cat meant by "abolish privacy laws", probably not all of them, but it would ultimately be irrelevant. See my post to the person above.

As for my "doxxers", lololololol. What cat's paw didn't mention in that post is that in a sane culture there would likely be none of those tactics on the Internet at all. It would be a civil society since seducers would be destroyed.

old comment by caamib

And regarding the comment on what women feel as uncomfortable, do you think women naturally want to be raped by niggers, have bullets in them and want to be impregnated by animals who will never take care of the kids?

Of course not.

But, at the same time, no more do they want to be good mothers and wives who will marry chaste and be decent wives.

Women are what you make of them in a society created by men.

If a society created by men is bad women will be bad. If a society created by men is good women will be good.

If you see the amount of men defending what is the death of any society, an atrocity like women's suffrage, you'll see that this society is dead.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mary Jane Lick Sick

As you love to repeat the same old same old talking points wherever you are (otherwise you'd drop them completely and never reuse them again: ever), I'll just reiterate what was stated on Kiwi Farms:

'Marjan must be extra salty considering he hates countries ruled by womens and now croatia has a sexy milf for president

You are receiving autismbux from feminists marjie are you upset?'

-Cubanodun

You do realise what all those government agencies in Croatia ultimately answer to: the government led by President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic; using mental gymnastics to try and deny what Cubanodum & Dynastia says is just your delusions - based on the poison that are your same old same old repeated talking points - further displayed by you.

I bet you can't come up with completely new concepts, and drop your old ones (especially the racist ones you always use to further prove what an inferior subhuman you are (as all racists are: otherwise they'd stop thinking like racists). There's an idea for a new year's resolution: New talking points.

Because whatever you use - based on said poisonous mindset which makes you come out with the BS you use right now - just isn't working. Is it? Otherwise the world would be exactly as you would wish it.

Stay salty (especially about the world - with the billions of men in relationships right now: and you never will be - not bending to your "GOR"-esque mantopia wish), cammy-poo.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Coconutsack

access to marriage and sex is approximately the point of human lives

So what was that again about my observation that an external expectation that men must get married is the driving force behind the collective obsessions of your ilk being insane?

Seriously now, doesn't the fact your married asshole "friend" Schmidt still spews his unending frustration and dissatisfaction with life tip you off a little? The fact that every day of his life he worries that the exact minute his wife is no longer afraid of him she would pack her bags and take the kids as far away as possible? The fact that he cares almost nothing for his family as people and wouldn't hesitate to toss them aside if they ever broke the model he laid out for their lives?

How about the MGTOW crowd acting like not getting married is some cosmic revelation? How about the fact that you have made repeated claims that women will kill men given half a chance but you still demand that one spend her life with you? The fact that Elliot Rodger - being independantly wealthy and handsome - was exactly the kind of guy you claim women form a line to bang after shoving you aside was despised by women and shunned by men for exactly the same reasons as you: the personality you insist shouldn't even factor into whatever madness you think defines a realtionship? The simple fact that after a life full of shit a wretched thing like you could barely comprehend let alone survive I am not anything like you?

A few things are finally clicking into place for me and your downward spiral only shows how lucky I am to have escaped falling into the same trap by adopting somebody else's idea of what my purpose and happiness in life is supposed to be. I have spent all of the pity I possibly can on creatures like you but through watching you devolve into this mess I better understand why my life was the way it was.

So here it is one more time: A completely honest thank you, Siklic, for your psychosis has helped me understand so much of why my mother is the way she is. KittyKaboom lent me an ear to help me face those particular demons and that helped me to be more open with my problems but it was watching you destroy yourself that is finally letting me understand the why of it and put them to rest.

You and pretty much anyone who gives you the time of day may be too far gone but it does my heart glad to think that one day someone who struggles in life for these reasons may follow the trail of tears across your posts to this point and realize what they've been doing wrong. Someone may learn to live and enjoy their life instead of emulating another and feeling empty for it.

Edit: Cleaned up spelling and grammatical structure. Sorry Moose, messes up the part you quoted a tad. Flattered you find me quotable.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Passerby

And you should see how Kiwi Farms has essentially destroyed what was once a cornerstone of the 'Manosphere':

https://kiwifar.ms/threads/charles-gellman-manhood101-com-the-cuck-academy.15285/

'Manhood 101'. Basically run along the lines of $cientology (as a $21 per month moneymaking scam; certainly it's strict rules by it's 'guru' Charles Gellman), the previously full of himself 'Keyboard Warrior' that was Chuck has now been reduced to a 'DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING' cuck.

As you pointed out, re. fschit, the ultimate irony in the case of Cuck Academy's (as MH101's now called) founder & admin Gellman is that he is married and with kids.

The Wordpress blogs & subReddits of misogynists being taken down. And now this. What was that about the 'Western' world collapsing, and that 'Modernism' & 'Feminism' fail, Mary Jane Lick Sick...?!

"The fact that Elliot Rodger, being independantly wealthy and handsome, was exactly the kind of guy you claim women form a line to bang after shoving you aside but was shunned by women and despised by men for exactly the same reasons you, the personality you insist shouldn't even factor into whatever madness you think defines a realtionship?"

It's interesting you mention Elliot Todger, because as Mary Jane Lick Sick said on his blog:

'On Elliot Rodger himself, what can I say? I will quote a member of the Love-shy forums

That being said, this guy is hardly an incel poster boy. Good looking, rich, he could have had female attention most of us only dream of. But he chose to live in one of the most superficial narcissistic locales on the planet, perhaps second only to Sydney. And he reeked of degeneration and narcissism himself. That would hardly be a turn off to a lot of the Hollywood/model types he was undoubtedly pursuing, but if as some suggested he was Aspie or awkward about it then it might.

So, no, I don’t understand this kid at all. He could have flown anywhere in the world with the money he had, there were places where he could have found a good non-feminist wife. I have no idea why he didn’t try that.

The kid was scum'

Yet at the very top of the Coalfart forum run by his 'guru' fschit, is this:

image

Ah, Mary Jane Lick Sick. Your hypocrisy knows no depths.

old comment by caamib

The entire nature of the bullshit white men are taught today makes them inadequate, as it goes against female nature.
Does consent exist in nature?
No.
So who thinks about consent?
Losers think about consent.
Can women be fully lesbian?
No, they can't.
So why do some women turn fully lesbian?
Because they're disgusted by men.
Does contraception exist in nature?
No.
So who uses contraception?
Losers use contraception.
Are dates a good way to get modern Western women?
No, dates are a horrible way to get modern Western women, since these women don't want to be treated civilly or be talked to.
So who goes on dates?
Losers go on dates.
Who washes their ass?
Entitled, boring straight white guys wash their ass.
You never see blacks, Muslims or such groups do any of this. Yet nobody's accusing them of anything.
Men who are not inadequate do what they want with women and colonize them with pregnancies. Yet the society teaches men not to do that.

Inadequacy comes from applying the standards that go against human nature.

Why do so many men have problems with women?

Because women hate men. And for good reason.

Men who aren't to be hated have no notion of nonsense like consent, contraception or female's will.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mary Jane Lick Sick

"Why do so many men have problems with women?

Because women hate men"

[citation needed] [/Flossman]

Q: Why do people take an instant dislike to cammy-poo?

A: Because it saves time. >:D

And unless you're prepared to call fschit scum for commemorating Elliot Todger in his forum, leave said forum and have nothing to do with fschit in perpetuity, then all you're doing is proving yourself the worse-than hypocrite you are, Mary Jane.

As for Doxxing, lololololol. We already know where you live. And just ask Charles 'Cuck' Gellman, whose previous cornerstone of the 'Manosphere' has been reduced to 'Cuck Academy'; the originally 'full of himself' Keyboard Warrior Chucky is now reduced to the DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING Cucky, who'll be lucky to have a job to go to, once - because of his total doxxing by those at Kiwi Farms - his boss at Wolters Kluwer Healthcare: a very much feminist woman gets to hear about what he's been saying on the internet.

An internet that only serves to destroy you the more you say what you do. And strengthen Feminism & Modernism.

If, as you claim, the 'West' with it's Feminism and Modernism is 'collapsing' (again, requiring just two words as per Flossman: '[citation needed]'), then why doesn't your "GOR"-esque 'Mantopia' exist by now...?!

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mary Jane Lick Sick

"Does contraception exist in nature?
No.
So who uses contraception?
Losers use contraception."

Charlie Sheen didn't use contraception. He thought he was 'WINNING!'.

He's now HIV+ as a result. Thus he's now...:

image

But then, you will never be in the situation where you'll 'impregnate' a woman, so admitting you're a loser, much?! >:D

Here is someone who will die a diseased drug-addled wreck: a Loser at life:

image

And Charlie Sheen.

PROTIP: Condoms were used by the ancient Romans. Made from sheep's intestines. Therefore contraception does exist in nature. [/hyper-smartarse]

But then, if you were a 'student of history' as you've previously claimed you are, you'd have known that.

“Laws that would benefit incels

Legalize prostitution.”
THAT one makes sense.

“Stop subsidizing abortion and birth control.”
You’re a sexist misogynist and no one will touch your peepee, and this will become better if we make abortion and birth control harder to access…. Or does ‘benefit incels’ include ‘amuse incels because women suffer.’?

“Abolish privacy laws. Women should not have the right to sue people who redistribute their slutty photos.”
Ha ha women suffer.

“Taxpayers subsidize abortion and birth control so they have the right to know which women use those services.”
How’s that work? The government collected money from you, it’s not your money any more. You want to control the budget, run for office.

“Make adultery and premarital sex illegal.”
Ah. Women and less ugly men also suffer, that’s what government is for.

“Make paternalist testing mandatory.”
Why in the name of any random deity would you care? How would fights and divorces benefit you except by bitter schadenfreude? Jesus, what a sad, sad litlt eperson you are.

“Ban women from working.”
You don’t want them on welfare, you don’t want them in the workforce, and you don’t want them to get alimony if their husband abandons them. Just go ahead and make it a slave class.
Of course, if you do, then men who can acquire slaves don’t need to share them wth your hateful ass. You’ll still die a virgin, you just won’t even have a chance to chat up a girl at work or the library at school, on the bus…

Cat's Paw #fundie sluthate.com

71 comments

Confused?