THIS IS VERY WRONG!!!! THIS IS BLIND FACTS...Quantom physics actually agrees with creationalism. YES and thats a fact. advanced sceince research also agrees with creationalism. According to C14 dating a sead chicken that's less than 72 hours dead is said to be more than 15 million years old. THEY HAVE NO REAL EVIDENCE AGAINST CREATIONALISM AND CREATIONALISM HAS MORE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANYTHING ELSE BECAUSE SCIENCE AND QUANTOM PHYSICS CAN"T EXIST WITHOUT IT!
49 comments
Agent19, please go back to Grade five, retake Grammar, and if you pass that, come back and teach us about QUANTUM physics and CREATIONISM. Until then, STFU!
Actually, carbon dating has a margin of error of several thousand years, which is incredibly accurate in comparison to other forms of radiometric dating, which are margins of hundred thousands to a few millions of years. This is because geologic time is so huge that a margin of a that many years is still an eyeblink. Carbon dating is more "accurate" within a margin of several thousand years because living beings have been around for only a small amount of time on this planet and because the half-life is shorter.
Radiocarbon dating does not extend further than 50k to 100k years, and is calibrated using dendrochronology (which dates to the exact year, using tree rings).
Radiocarbon dating will never give a date of 15 million years.
Creationalism? Stop making up words, You have no real evidence for CREATIONISM.
Quantum physics and C14 dating? You do realise that these things have nothing to do with each other?
And what is a "blind fact" anyway.
Before you try to win an arguement by trying to sound intelligent, at least do some research first.
Q: What do I do with this nonsensical C14 result?
A: (scientist) Write it up in case some physicist might want the data and use a different, more appropriate dating system.
A: (creationist) Throw it out and go with what was said in the Bible, because if C14 doesn't work, none of the methods work.
maybe it was a 15 million year old chicken that just happened to die 72 hours ago.
What is "REAL EVIDENCE" as opposed to evidence?
Is there such a word as "CREATIONALISM" ?
what is " ANYTHING ELSE" mean?
and I am a Quantum Physicist and I do exist since Creationism effects only the very stupid and slow of mind, and since Quantum Physics is a science, so the use of "SCIENCE & QUANTOM" is as stupid as your spelling.
Who is C14? and whats a sead chicken?
Quantom phantom blind facts...? Um, who? C14 seed chicken...?
I don't know whether to groove to a 7:4 beat, or run away.
1Agent19, you need new blinker fluid.
According to C14 dating a dead chicken that's less than 72 hours dead is said to be more than 15 million years old.
So that means the earth is at least 15 million years old. Otherwise, where would the chicken have gotten the 15 million year old carbon? Hint: calcium supplements given to chickens may be made from fossilized diatoms.
QUANTOM PHYSICS (whatever that might be) can't exist without CREATIONALISM (whatever that might be)? And, for that matter, SCIENCE too? Um... THIS IS VERY WRONG!!!! Well, at least you got something right.
According to C14 dating a sead chicken that's less than 72 hours dead is said to be more than 15 million years old
So applying the wrong tool to the wrong problem produces wrong answers. And your point? (And your source, while we're at it?)
I seriously doubt this guy even knows what Quantum physics is about.
Btw, what the heck is a "blind fact"?
Edit:
I think this image goes perfectly with that quote:
image
C-14 dating can only date back to 40,000 to 50,000 years, after that background radiation makes accurate C14 detection near impossible.
Nobody would get a reading of 15 million if they had any idea how to do radiometric testing.
no one can be this stupid unintentionally
Yes. Yes, they can. You must unlearn what you have learned: humans have an infinite capacity for stupid. No matter how dumb you think people are, there's always someone dumber.
Stupidity is a bottomless pit. It just keeps going, without end.
Even if C14 dating was shown to be incorrect, that wouldn't be a suport for "creationalism." It might make us rethink a few thinks about our current understanding of evolution, but that's not the same as "agreeing with creationalism."
Advice...
-Caps off. Sentences of caps make you look like a huge moron.
-Spell-check. At least re-read your work once before posting it.
-Cite your source. Anyone can write anything they want, but without evidence to back it up it means nothing, just like your post.
-In all technicalities, this idiot is right. But if you go by quantum theory than you can never be wrong, because quantum theory is based on the idea that we live in a universe in which every combination of particle exists and behaves in every possible way regardless of how improbable. This universe in turn exists within a multiverse in which every conceivable combination of events, regardless of how unlikely, has occurred at least once. Thus, in all technicalities, there is a god, there is a giant flying spaghetti monster, people did come to be as they are now after the fall of the elves in middle-earth, giant transforming robots are created by a cube, the earth is a giant flat surface which the sun orbits around and so forth. It's unlikely, and probably not within our universe, but who knows, with all the possible combinations of events and particles out there, it has to have happened somewhere.
"Quantom"
You cannot spell 'Quantum ' Therefore your right to think that your 'opinion' can be listened to, never mind being able to formulate a coherent thought in which to base an 'opinion' on, is invalid .
Get a proper (as in non -'Hoemskuled') education, then we'll talk. Somehow, I doubt the head of the international criminal organisation (who make SPECTRE seem like the Boy Scouts) is called 'Tom'. [/Bond nerd] [/"Skyfall"] [/smartarse]
"THIS IS VERY WRONG!!!! THIS IS BLIND FACTS"
"THEY HAVE NO REAL EVIDENCE AGAINST CREATIONALISM AND CREATIONALISM HAS MORE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANYTHING ELSE BECAUSE SCIENCE AND QUANTOM PHYSICS CAN"T EXIST WITHOUT IT!"
image
X3
1Agent19: 'Do you expect me to talk?'
Auric-e-moose Goldthumb: 'No, Mr. 19, I expect you to to be pointed and laughed at in perpetuity! ' >:D
"THIS IS VERY WRONG!!!!"
That much is obvious.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.