[OP and comments under "A distinction should be made between the rape of a chaste woman and that of a promiscuous slut."]

@Holyheavens

A chaste woman is either a virgin, a married woman who's only partner in her life has been her husband or a remarried widow. In each of these instances, no fornication took place.

I define the promiscuous slut as a woman who's had sexual relations with more than partner in her life safe for remarried widows as mentioned above.

I'm lenient on premarital sex only if it's done with her one and only lifepartner.

Moving on the topic of rape; a distinction should be made on the severity of punishment depending on whether the victim falls in one of either categories.

The chaste woman can be considered to have been truly traumatized in case of rape, because she has been sullied and bereft of her dignity she was taught to uphold.

The promiscuous slut has no dignity or principles to speak of in the first place. It can barely be considered human because it immediately acts on lust like a wild beast without considering the consequences. Such a creature ought best to pursue a career of prostitution, considering it has no value as a mother or wife. It's not much different from a sexual object. The most it loses when being raped is a couple of minutes. What is one dick more after having been penetrated by various others?

A rapist who's raped a woman in the first category must receive a heavy punishment. Chaste women should be protected from being dirtied at all costs for they are the (future) wifes of moral men. So the death penalty is fitting.

A rapist who's raped a woman in the second category must pay a fine to the raped slut. A slut is not much different from a prostitute -except that she gives her cunt out for free to various men which could be considered as even worse than prostitution- so why not at least pay her to keep things fair and treat her for the whore she is?

From 7339er:

I wouldn't even give the 2nd rapist a fine to be honest. She should think of it as repayment for that male incel's taxes paying for her free abortions and birth control.

From MelvinTheMerciless:

In the second category the fine should not be paid to the slut but to the father of the slut or whoever the legal male guardian may be. If no man claims the slut as part of his household then we're talking about public property. A town bike. So a fine would only be appropriate if a man used the slut in a way that left it unsuitable for future use by other men. In that case, the fine should be paid to the government or the courts (perhaps to defray the costs associated with enforcing monogamy) or to a charitable fund (perhaps one dedicated to the development of sex robots and other female replacement technologies).