Don’t waste your time with these evo clowns, Tribune. They have lots and lots of religious stuff they want you to read but when all is said and done, their beliefs are no more scientific than the fortune teller at the country fair. They can’t even explain how a device as simple as a mousetrap could “evolve” via darwinism, let alone a complex structure like the eye.
35 comments
It's simple.
Mouse traps evolved from fly traps, which evolved from lint traps, which evolved from coat hangers.
That's how evolution works, is it not?
Robbie-
Ah, hah! But how do you explain the existence of picture hangers, which also supposedly evolved from coat hangers? I mean, if coat hangers evolved into picture hangers, then how could they also evolve into mousetraps? And why do we still have coat hangers?
Huh? Answer me that!
joagfggSk,jljlkj.kj/.nmlkj
sorry about that gibberish, that was just me beating my head on the key bored at his stupidity. then again, that gibberish is alot smarter than what he said
The fact that you can't even quote-mine Behe's flawed mousetrap argument any more intelligently than that speaks volumes about your lack of understanding of science.
You don't really understand what science is, do you, Razzle? You're one of those people who think science is a thing, and not a process, aren't you?
Fuck, you're stupid, Razzle. Dumber than a bag of hammers, dimmer than a burnt bulb...
But... but... I was taught that every "kind" of thing that exists today already existed back when Noah built the ark, because God wouldn't let things change into other kinds of things! But now Robbie and solomongrundy and other people are saying that there used to be things like icepicks, and hoop skirts, and shoe horns, and household trash incinerators, that aren't manufactured any more!
Clearly, all traces of those awful faith-shaking "extinct" things have been planted by Satan, or possibly by garbage collectors and antique dealers working for Satan.
Once someone starts selectively labeling inductive reasoning as "religion", any further discussion with him is pointless. He basically won't accept any proof for anything that disagrees with him. As one creationist pointed out, you can't even sit on a chair without making the assumption that it will continue to exist as you lower your butt. Arguing with such extreme skepticism is as pointless as discussing the number of angels that can fit on a pin. It would be like trying to disprove Last Thursdayism. When he applies his skepticism inconsistently, then he's just chain-yanking.
Awwwww, it's a widdle "Irreduceable Complexity"-phile... Cute, I thought they were all extinct.
Every single one of Behe's claims has been utterly and comprehensively refuted. you don't want to know that though do you.
They can’t even explain how a device as simple as a mousetrap could “evolve” via darwinism.
Uh, because a 'mousetrap' is a non=living, inanimate object, perhaps?
Actually I'm pretty sure I could evolve a mousetrap if you give me a piece of wood, a spring, and some small lengths of steel. Just need to put them all in the same room with some champaign and Barry White... 9 months later, a little baby mousetrap!
No one will show you that because they are too busy laughing at your stupidity. The relgion thing is so dumb and repetitive I'm just going to ignore that rubbish.
And evolving mousetrap, I mean, do you really believe what you are saying is so self-evident? Can you not see what illogical stupidity you are spewing? You must see a lot of people shaking their heads every day.
image
Fuck, you're stupid, Razzle. Dumber than a bag of hammers, dimmer than a burnt bulb...
Dharmasatya, I'd quote Weird Al Yankovic's "Genius In France" for a whole load of synonyms, except that even by the comedic standards set in the song we'd never mistake razzle for someone with half a brain, nevermind a genius (for an escaped psychiatric inmate, OTOH... )
As has been suspected by scientists for many years, mouse traps have a common ancestor with the mice they feed upon! This amazing revelation, discovered by razzle, is total bullocks.
Mouse traps don't breed. Eyes do (well, creatures with eyes reproduce).
Would help if the mouse trap was alive and could reproduce.
Now, since when did evolutionists- or any scientists for that matter- use religion? Last time I checked it was the fundies using religion to explain everything.
Mousetrap today, evolves into toaster tomorrow, evolves into washing machine next week.
I don't know how it happens, but it does. I have a book that says so. (Well, I wrote the book first but that still counts).
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
