No, Hitler and the Nazis were NOT a plague on the white race. The Jewish led Bolsheviks had slaughtered 20 million Russians and were poised to do the very same thing to Germany. Go back and read about it. That explains the Nazis quick rise to power. And the Nazis had no intention of “exterminating” the Jews; the Nazis had lots of ammo and could have killed every last Jew if they wanted to. The Jews were detained because they could not be trusted, the same way that we detained the Japanese. And the Jews that died mostly died of typhus and starvation. Allies bombed the railroad lines and cutoff supplies to the camps causing many to starve. The Jews were not the only group to suffer, the whole world suffered during those wars. Look at Dresden or Holomodor, or Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Millions died period, not just Jews. Pick up a copy of the Gulag Archipeligo and see what it was like in a Jewish run Soviet gulag.
Start reading and just maybe the truth will start to sink in.
22 comments
Yeah, and the SS bought all that Zyklon-B as weedkiller.
How about you read about it: start with Hitler's book, where he makes it pretty clear what his intention toward Jews was.
1) The Soviet leadership had very few Jews in it by 1933.
2) Stalin had just purged much of the Soviet General Staff, so was in no position to launch an attack on Germany.
3) The Soviet Union's comparative weakness meant that Stalin accepted Hitler's non-aggression pact with alacrity.
4) The threat of Soviet invasion played no measureable part in the Nazis' rise to power; the issue was the internal threat of the KPD.
5) If you think the Nazis had no intention of exterminating the Jews, you obviously haven't read Hitler's Reichstag speech of January 30, 1939.
6) The Nazis didn't need ammo to kill Jews; gas, starvation and rifle butts did the trick just as well.
7) Funny, then, that the overwhelming majority of detained Japanese survived the war, whereas the overwhelming majority of "detained" Jews did not. If the Jews died of typhus and starvation - and many did, if most did not - then does not the responsibility for that lie with their captors, the Nazis?
(continued)
8) Many Jewish historians and groups have drawn attention to the fact that the Allies did not bomb the rail links and supply roads to the camps. Besides, the largest extermination camps, such as Treblinka and Majdanek, were out of the range of Allied bombers during their period of greatest activity. The death marches also testify to the ability of the Germans to transport Jews out of the camps in the worst of conditions; strange, then, that you say they couldn't transport food in.
9) The majority of European Jewry was murdered during the Second World War. That is true of no other people. About 10% of all casualties in the European and North African theaters are Jews, a people who counted for about 1% of Europe's pre-war population. So, yes, they are significant and the numbers killed knock Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined into a cocked hat.
10) I suggest you read The Gulag Archipelago again, for Solzhenitsyn does not say anything about the gulag being run by Jews. Solzhenitsyn explicitly rejects the idea that the Jews were behind the Bolshevik Revolution and, while some of his opinion on Jews were, to say the least, unfortunate, he was never half the anti-Semite that you are.
The Jewish-led Bolsheviks? Gee, that must have been why Stalin instituted one of the grosser anti-semitic campaigns after World War II (looked it up under "rootless cosmopolitan" or the Great Purge of 1936 or the Night of the Murdered Poets in 1952).
Oh, and we're going to use that tired old "the camps were just labor camps and all those people died because the Allied forces bombed the railroads." That is so old! Try something else.
And I always thought it was a standing meme on the crazoid right that Uncle Joe killed many more Jews than Hitler did as some type of defense of Hitler. Are you assholes giving that up now?
Well said, Hasan.
What do they teach as history in the USA? Because I don't see any of the history I was taught in this diatribe.
Ilya, Lenin's father, was a devout Orthodox Christian and his mother a Lutheran. All his children were baptised (If I recall he had six). Lenin's grandfather was a Russian Jew who married a Christian and was baptised Catholic, (I think, it was a long time ago since I learned this).
The Nazi rise to power coincided with hyperinflation which they promised to end. That and violent action against dissenters.
Isn't it about time this revisionism was stopped in the USA and the facts taught in schools?
"Start reading and just maybe the truth will start to sink in."
If you are anything to go by that's pretty unlikely.
BTW
They did try shooting Jews but they found that shooting small children and babies was having an adverse effect on their soldiers moral. Hence the move to gassing
@ Adey
The state of American education isn't exactly rosy, but this is NOT the type of stuff they teach in history class. Racist assholes either homeschool (where they can tell their kids whatever they want) or they undermine what the teacher tells them with their own revisionist history from an early age.
@Adey
Thanks for your comment, but I need to defend those in the US who teach history. I attended the annual convention of the American Historical Association (the professional body which covers historians and many history teachers in the US) at the start of the month, and I don't think there's a single revisionist member. The sad fact is that revisionists can be found in most Western and plenty of non-Western countries; a glance at the various countries represented on Stormfront, the European Alliance of Nationalist Movements or the national chapters of Blood and Honour, never mind the products of publishing houses across the developing world, all bear witness to that. What makes the US stand out is that it has a large population with access to the internet, a strong nativist/white nationalist tradition in the South, and is English-speaking. Most importantly, the kind of speech that would get you arrested in many European countries - such as Holocaust denial - is protected in the US by the First Amendment. Do not confuse what you see here, which is by definition extreme, with what most Americans think.
"Wow, even Dave Blount got fed up with these guys. Even evil has standards?"
Now if only he'd question why his ideology is so attractive to Nazi-wannabes.
There were a disproportionate number of Jews in the early Bolshevik ranks, when measured against their numbers in the overall population; but the same was true of Georgians and people from the Baltic provinces. Whaddaya know, the ethnicities that suffered heavier oppression by the Czarist regime were more likely to join revolutionary groups. Such a surprise. But as others noted, Stalin (a Georgian, of course) purged many Jews. And why do you never hear these assholes ranting about "Georgian Bolshevism" or "Baltic Bolshevism?" It would be just as accurate. Oh, yeah: because they're stupid fuckwads who don't care about facts, and don't know them anyway.
But I thought liberals were Hitler, is the American reactionary right trying to appropriate Hitler for themselves?
(PS - You can have Hitler and the rest of his crew if you want)
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.