FSTDT

Dolbik #conspiracy cad-forums.com

Who of us is brainwashed?If everything what was in the game,why its fucking makes no scence?Yes,war-crimes of course was,but no more then in army's of another army's.Stalin wast angel,but he wasnt idiot and he knew what army without discipline is deprived of the ability to fight.Rape in Berlin?You realy belive in this Goebbels myth about million raped germans?In fact, statistically inevitable cases of crimes among the soldiers of the Red Army were not widespread and were condemned by the official propaganda and military courts. Precise data on their absolute number is not yet available to researchers, but it is currently known documents point to the limited number of such incidents. The myth of them are actively spreading the German war propaganda in the final stages of the war in order to mobilize the population to resist the anti-Hitler coalition. After the war, the samples of Goebbels propaganda department is actively used by the U.S. against the Soviet Union, which was reflected in a number of "historical research" that are subject to valid criticism by modern writers

Gorby #fundie cad-forums.com

ok this is to everyone that said they disagree with me on my last post.
I understand that you may have different opinions, and will take offense, but that was just my opinion, its different for everyone. If I didn't believe in God I would be like that im 100% sure. Atheism is communism, every country that has gone Atheist has gone communist, like China, and like USSR was.

Gorby #fundie cad-forums.com

If the world went Athiest no one would survive, because IF there is no God (I beleive there is, but lets say there wasn't) who would make the rules? If there is no God you would be the ruler of your own life. SO everyone would make their own rules. Why would i want to follow the rules some other PERSON, they wouldn't lots of people would make their own rules because they are the ruler of their own life, this would cause total chaos.

BigDaddyof2 #fundie cad-forums.com

[This takes place in the thread about a woman's role in society. It is a different user. These commetns come after the site's primary administrator says there are to be no more mysoginistic commetns. The quoted user was banned shortly after posting this.]

Yes, it is the woman's fault for society's ills. She should have stayed in her place. Empowered women offend me because they take away from being productive in our society like they should be. (ie raising the family and taking care of their man)

[Quotes another user asking if it is wrong for a woman to expect equality.]

Yes, it is wrong for women to want to be equalized across the board. They are equal partners in the home as long as they stay in their place. many of the problems in the world todat stem from the fact that the woman has left the home to go to work, left the kids to be raised by strangers with no moral compass and left the husband to take up the slack from her inability to "have a career" and take care of her duties as a wife and mother.

[Quote: They'll [The kids] grow up thinking that women have to be stay at home Betty Crockers. Or that women don't deserve a place of power in the world.]

They should and they shouldn't (respectively)

[Quotes a user asking about stay-at-home dads]

Those men are wimps that should not be allowed to procreate. It gives the children the wrong perspective about the roles of men and women in the world. This type of man destroys the family even more than same sex couples that try to raise children. The children lose perspective about their roles because mommy and daddy have lost perspective about themselves.

RemyAF #fundie cad-forums.com

I could give countless different aspects of the possible problems with the new roles for women.

Look at relationships; empowered women go for the bad boys and treat the nice guy like crap. By the time they tire of the bad boys and want to settle down with a nice guy, those nice guys have gone for women that aren’t so empowered.

Look at children; ever since the change of roles, starting with the ‘70’s there have been more and more discipline issues with children, more violence, less of the traditional parenting and more sensitivity. And that sensitive parenting isn’t working. The increase in children isn’t proportional to the increase in disciplinary problems.

Look at women themselves; some women still enjoy dressing sexy and getting by on their looks. All women aren’t on the same page and the sexy women showing their bodies are a detriment to the cause of equal treatment of all women. Those women let themselves be perceived as objects and it’s not always a good thing.

Sources were too numerous to list, but are available if required.

Is society better off with the roles of women so drastically varied and conflicted?