The Earth/Moon pair is less than 50,000 years old based on how fast they are moving apart. Working the math backyards yields this age. Nasa knows and is hiding it. But THEY told us the moving apart rate.

The Moon has only one and a half inches of silt. Asimov predicted 54 feet SINCE it is there being beaten by the Sun for "billions of years". Nasa wasted millions building detachable duck feet on the lunar lander to keep astronauts from being swallowed alive. One almost peed himself with fear while landing, fearing this. But see Armstrong's footprint.
http://images.ksc.nasa.gov/photos/1969/medium/AS11-40-5903.jpg
Using Asimov's own math and the real depth of the soil yields a max age of about 6-7 thousand years.

Bishop Wilberforce of the Catholics computed all those boring "begats" in the Bible and found the time from Adam to Christ is about 4004 years. We know the time from Christ to us as the current year, 2008. Adding the two together yields a planetary age (according to God) of about 6000 years. So the Bible is closer to fact than Isaac Asimov and his evolutionary buddies.

Astronauts found that sticking their rock dating thermometer thingy on one side of a moon rock gave a completely different "age" reading than on the other side (especially the underside). So it's all crap.

Carbon-14 and all other chemical dating methods are flawed and KNOWN to be so by the very guys who invented them. For them to work even halfway right, you have to know how much carbon-14 (or whatever) was already there in the beginning. If a candle is an inch tall and burning at 1 inch per hour, it has one hour to live. But how long has it BEEN burning? That depends on the length of the candle, no? That is the initial value. Without it, the math is useless. AND THEY KNOW IT, because we told them.

They employ circular reasoning. They date fossils found in stone by the kind of stone they find them in. Yet they conversely date the stones by the type of fossils found within them.

Why do they do this? Because they know they can't trust Carbon-14, etc.

So why do they tell you it's trustworthy?

They say, they get their initial values from "index values". Those are just numbers printed on paper. Where did the data come from? Who went back in time and found out how much Carbon-14 was up old T-Rex?

I have just demonstrated three or four of their outright lies.

Hiding data is the same as lying. Taking tax money to fund a cult religion is theft.

And you trust your immortal soul to these guys?