FSTDT

wwwarea #conspiracy wwwarea.deviantart.com

Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.”
-Albert Einstein
According to 'Good Reads' or wherever it came from.

www.goodreads.com/quotes/16120—
www.collective-evolution.com/2—
www.shift.is/2013/04/does-matt—

www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPepr—

---------

I was considered "crazy" or like that by some of my enemies that I am open minded to question our current beliefs.

I'm a person who is open to the questioning of our beliefs. So I went to theorize or accepted the theory or somehow both and be open minded with spirituality, with many possibilities (even the types of people that hate that idea), even openly suggesting that it could mean 'this' or 'that' and they went like:
"WHATZ THAT'S WRONG, THE MAJORITYZ LOOKS UPON IT, NEW AGE BULLSH*T! WHAT! DOESN'T BELIEVE IN MATTER??!!!!!"
"LOONY!!!!"

This is why I love being awake. XD

And by the way, how is 'New Age' bulls***? Oh right some of you believe that it is because of what others feel about it right?
In reality, some 'new age' stuff actually makes a lot of sense, and has a lot of good points and scientific things on some parts, etc.
Though I am not clear on what 'New Age' means, but I think those who find it "bull****" are the ones who can't get out of there comfort zone.

Oh and by the way, I was attacked for believing this kind of stuff.

Don't ever depend on popular belief just because it's a lot of people/just because it's popular.

wwwarea #fundie wwwarea.deviantart.com

UPDATE 11/7/2015
Some people take offense that I shouldn't compare people with disabilities to animals.
The time I used them was to compare them (And now I will just consider the type of people who lacks certain abilities) only for the sake of the argument that it depends on 'how much we can do', and I thought it would be fair to compare a person who lacks an arm (for example) to someone who has that and can do more.. Only for the sake of that kind of argument of 'more'. So I thought it was fair. I did NOT intend to harm. I just thought one thing connected to an argument type, I am not saying some humans are like non-human animals (Or that depends, and yet, all humans are similar anyway).
Also, I may have lack of stuff that I can't control too. But I'm still standing up, and so can anyone else.
Also, all animals are equal to living anyway. Soooo.
UPDATE DONE

NOTE: It's completely fine to personally prefer humans over other animals, just like how it's fine to personally prefer other animals over humans.

But it pisses me off how humanaboos go act like humans are "more important", "special", and so forth.
It's just as bad as when a wolfaboo morally treats wolves as "superior".
After all, IF people are allowed to give the opinion that human animals are superior, then people are ALSO allowed to do the same with other animals then.
Or if it's considered "animalaboo, or whatever" to argue that a non-human animal is "superior", then the same concern (the term humanaboo) should be about treating humans as superior to other animals.

Anyway, treating humans as "superior" in terms of morality, and rights is one of the 3 main reasons why I have a general dislike on our own race. It disgusts me.

blog.burningman.com/wp-content—

Now I like to show some stupid idiotic myths.

"Not all animals are equal because humans can do more!!!"
In terms of what we do, it's kinda true that all animals (including animals) on this planet can't do everything (Though we do not fully know what each creature can do) humans can do. However, does that mean they are not morally equal, with respect, etc? NO.
Hell, even non-human animals can do things humans can't do. There really is no 'actual more' either.
Yet, what about all the humans that has disabilities? Are we going o say that people with disabilities are not equal? Because according to logic, if I had to agree based off what we do, then I would need to agree that humans with disabilities are not equal then.
faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/p—

"Animals don't have rights."
Humans are animals. If other animals do not have rights, then neither does homo sapiens.
Also, who gave out the illusion that it must depend on what humans do? Just because humans can build all this cool technologically, that doesn't mean other animals can no longer have rights. What we do, does not connect with nature fundamentals of other creatures.
blog.burningman.com/wp-content—
www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news6—

"But humans understand rights, therefor, humans can only have rights!"
The term "Human rights" it's self, is just an idea made up by humans.
But if a human said that we have super powers, does that mean we have them? No.
Human rights are 'real', because it's based off 'natural rights'.
A natural right is a basic nature fundamental thing. And you want to know also shares this fundamental thing?
Non-human animals.
All animals have rights. Natural Rights.
Humans have natural rights, and so does non-human animals.
Just like humans, other animals try to survive too.
eyler.freeservers.com/JeffPers— - Don't know if I agree to all though.
Another interesting article: animalrights.about.com/od/anim—

"Animals don't have Free Will!"
Not even humans have free will. I mean what is 'Free Will'? Despite the fact that there IS evidence of free will in non-human animals, but humans don't have this special 'free' choice. I believe they are controlled by some part of their nature brain in a physical sense.
www.scientificamerican.com/art—
At the same time, I do believe it might exist, but the same can be said for other animals because of the evidence.

In the end kinda, it doesn't matter what we do, what matters is the fact that all animals consent to living, taking some action/behavior, and other.
If an animal is trying to live/survive, it's a natural right. It may not 100% be the same as what humans do (Humans saying words, etc.). But how does that somehow "change" it? Face it, the idea that it "does" is based off the egoist mind of some humans.
You do not need to 'say or reason' to show rights. You just have to show that you are trying to live.

Also, remember if we do depend on what 'humans do', then what about the humans that has disabilities?

All animals have rights, all has a soul, and all can possibly be unique with intelligence, which by the way exist in at least a lot of other animals.
Other animals feel pain too. I also wonder why people are against actual rape, but is fine with killing? Kinda odd.

Yet, to the arguments that "animal rights are made up"? The only thing that is completely made up is the idea that other animals don't have rights.

---------

There is other myths and possible facts. I do think I didn't write this very well much.
Here is some other links though!
speciesismthemovie.com/
www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news6—
lesswrong.com/lw/i63/arguments—
www.livescience.com/41601-spec—
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciesi—

_______________________________________

Other arguments - Free Will and Possibly Consenting

io9.com/5714341/even-animals-a—

www.psychologytoday.com/blog/a—

wwwarea #conspiracy wwwarea.deviantart.com

The term 'mental illnesses' is very unscientific it's self and I think we need to stop using that term.

Again, I am NOT saying people who suffer really bad should not get help.
Helping others lead out of depression has often worked, but again, the label 'mental illnesses' has lead to a bunch of bullshit too, has called simple natural things like "depressions" as a real sickness and have did unnecessary acts with it.

We label many personalities as "disorders", and other simple things as that. Either just because sometimes you can get depressed with it, or just for being different it's self.

And I was once told that having a natural feeling such as jealously over a fictional character was considered a mental "illness".
(Take a look at this conversation I've had.)
NOTE: I am not sure if this is the same thing as putting someone's name on here. I don't usually do that, but I linked to a conversation because a lot of other stamps did it.

Anyway, I think anyone can get depressed. It's a natural response. Anxiety is natural response, it's just part of a basic system in us.
But the society system has been making very unfair labels over even the most simple responses that are not so much.

I do NOT like getting anxiety and I do not like being depressed, but at the same time, I don't want to label that some kind of "illness". It's just part of our brains, of who we are.

---------

That's my rant. I hope a lot of those understand what I'm saying.

I do not mean to offend, but I just find the labeling really unfair and unusual.

Also when I was writing this, I may have noticed that it could of been referring to people with MAJOR depression.
Well honestly, I still do not believe it's an illness because major depression can still have a reasonable reason.. Blame the things that cause major depression, not the person. And yes, I think I was in some major depression to.. While I do not enjoy it, I also do not enjoy that bullshit label being put over me because I was majorly depressed.
If I was frown upon for opening up by everyone in the world, I would be majorly depressed too, but again, that's a natural response that anyone can get. And it's not my fault I got that major depression. Blame society.

Again, when it comes to the ones who has suffered so much, with anxiety, to even self harm and suicide (another self harm?), that's very sad and that's concerning, but I still think we can do better than making up terms and labels out in the open like that.
We should still help those people, and we need to be more tolerate toward people, but I find the label it's self not only unfair, but it's probably just going to make more people depressed and those already depressed, more depressed.

wwwarea #conspiracy wwwarea.deviantart.com

remember fighting with a guy who thinks he/she knows everything about realms, reincarnation, multiverse, and maybe more. Apparently this person is a bigot and thinks he/she knows everything. Example: I explain why anything (Even any fiction we know today) can be real under certain reasons and the person said something like: "You can turn anything you want in the realms, or so, but not this or that.." And the person just says that because of the rabid emotional bigotry emotions this person has.

Anyway, I found a really stupid stamp that claims "You were never a -name- in your paste life!" (It did not exactly said that maybe) and it was pretty stupid.
Worst of all it was part of that rabid anti-wolfaboo group; attempting to make people who believes in reincarnation and past lives as another animal as "rabid".

Well sorry to burst your all "knowing" mind bubble, but you do not know anyone's past life.
I wouldn't argue things as "fact" just because I said so, but this is obviously true. YOU DON'T KNOW ANYONE'S PAST LIFE.
The only one who is doing the "because I said so" is the guy who thinks he/she knows the afterlife, the before life, realms, dimensions, multiverse, and maybe more.
It's quite possible that if a past life exist, then it's VERY possible that you were an animal in a past life some time.

Humans are animals too, and no animal on this planet (Including us) has a special difference in our nature.

Now of course, we probably don't even know if we had a past life, but under the theory that we had past lives, you do not know anyone's past life.
And it might be possible for people to remember their own.

Heck, life it's self could be an illusion, and Otherkin too could be possible in spiritual terms.