According to actual research, hypergamy is on the decline, even in India and other parts where arranged marriages were normal (i.e. the FATHER chose the husband, not the woman herself).
Female biology? It's not so different from male biology, dolt. There are bigger differences between individuals than between genders.
Juggernaut law? BRB, I need to google a bit. [...] Nah, still don't understand what it has to do with this.
@ Kanna
Ah, that makes sense. However much sense anything can ever do with these blithering idiots...
IF there is a sexual market, then average would be around 4-6. As most people in the real world do find someone to settle down with and perhaps have kids with, only when you get to sub3, the problem would emerge. As these dolt refuse to accept the real world, that men who are married and have children could possibly be happy, they invented the "cucked" idiocy, and INSIST on women only having sex with chads and that normies' kids are really chads's kids anyway.
If we are going to be prejudiced and keep to old sex-roles - and these dolts love that - men were said to (and have been shown to) cheat more on their wives than wives cheated on their husbands. Men had little or nothing to lose by cheating, they were just seen as studs. Women could be deprived of both their homes and their children, and their freedom if they were really unlucky (some where put in insane asylums and some in prison, and if you go back far enough, some were burned at the stake). Nowadays, when women don't rely on men for somewhere to live, the numbers are of course more even. But since when has these dolts ever looked at reality?
