I don't believe in evolution either, the bible makes way more sense to me. Besides, too many archeological things were found to show that science is biased beyond a doubt. Why cover up the flood? Why come up with a bs theory of evolution? To spread Atheism?
35 comments
No, Damian, I assure you - the Bible does not make sense to you.
too many archeological things were found to show that science is biased beyond a doubt.
(a) Evolution has nothing to do with atheism. It's only a problem for people who insist on a literal reading of Genesis. But so is astronomy, geology and physics, so just getting rid of evolution wouldn't help them anyway.same time , though.
Yeah, you got us. All evolutionary biologists have been in on this grand conspiracy to destroy Christianity because we have nothing better to do with our time. That whole story about science being dedicated to human progress and understanding? All nonsense.almost got rid of the whole Jehovah thing, too... but if that's not going to work, we'll have to fess up and reveal all the things we've been telling people didn't really exist.
Ya got us. Good job there, Sparky. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go gather phlogiston so that I can cook breakfast here on flat earth.
"I don't believe in evolution either, the bible makes way more sense to me."That's sad. You're so far gone that an ancient fairy tale with NO supporting evidence makes more sense than a well-supported, scientific theory.
"Besides, too many archeological things were found to show that science is biased beyond a doubt."
Name a couple. Go ahead. I'm waiting.
"Why cover up the flood?"
Why contend that there WAS a global flood when there is no evidence for it?
"Why come up with a bs theory of evolution?"
Indeed. If the ToE WAS BS, one would have to ask that, but the ToE is not BS, creationism/ID is BS.
"To spread Atheism?"
That the presentation of scientific data sometimes helps people shake off their religious delusions is a good thing, however, scientific data and theories are not developed to spread atheism, just to spread knowledge. The atheism often follows naturally.
So you're hoping to discredit science by calling it biased, just because a hypothesis is solidified with some evidence?
It's funny. The "church" used to fund much of archeology, that is until they started finding evidence contrary to what they believed in. Then they all became heretics. The truth is, you don't want to know the truth, you can't handle the truth.
"I don't believe in evolution either, the bible makes way more sense to me."
I don't believe in evolution either, the bible makes way more sense to me. Massive fallacy. Learning isn't about picking the idea that sounds best to you and live by it. Can I say that I don't believe we came from tiny little sperm and egg cells that grew into full-size humans and instead stick with the "stork down the chimney" theory as it "makes more sense to me"? Ludicrous.here is one of many extensive list of problems with a Global Flood. Note that I did not write it, and that if anyone knows the name of the original author(s) so that I can give due credit, please pass it on. I feel like a thief of sorts spreading it around.
1 No one should "believe" in evolution, like all science it should be accepted based upon the evidence.
You're welcome to try and find a universal marker which would indicate a worldwide flood. I'll be here waiting for you if you ever find such evidence.
I don't believe in evolution either, the bible makes way more sense to me. Besides, too many archeological things were found to show that science is biased beyond a doubt.
Name one. Are you aware that, in every single post like this that I have read, not one person who belives in the Bible has given anything more than vague assertions. It's always "they say" or "it has been proven", but there's never anything more to it. Post one tiny little shred of evidence that shows that scientists are biased against your religion, or tried to cover up the flood. You can't, because there isn't any.
The Bible is a fictional book.
You can't cover up a flood which never happened. Of the two theories which explain the flood, both would result in the deaths of every organism on Earth. The idea the water came in on a comet is ludicrous, a comet carrying enough water to flood the entire Earth would release the power of a one exatonne nuclear bomb on impact. That would vapourise and melt most of the surface.
The idea of an ice shield covering the Earth also doesn't work, for it to last 2000 years from creation to the flood would, sunlight wouldn't reach the surface and the ice shield would melt at the equator and quickly fall apart.The ice shield would have to be kilometers thick to last 2000 years.
...the bible makes way more sense to me.
Besides, too many archeological things were found to show that science is biased beyond a doubt.
Why cover up the flood?
Why come up with a bs theory of evolution?
To spread Atheism?
Ah, again, the "Science is an Atheist conspiracy with thousands of scientists hiding the Biblical truth" SHIT.
The truth is: For hundreds of year very religious educated men have looked for Biblical evidence and come up dry. Many of these were trained archeologists who studied the geographic column extensivly and again came up dry.
But the last 50 years we've seen the new creationists process. Uneducated theologians who are lying for Jesus. From Wyatt up we hear nothing but claims of evidence with no proof of it and denial of actual science without any basis for that denial.
A few years back FoxNews got off on a slander case because a judged ruled 'a news network doesn't have to tell the truth'. Sadly that has stood as a precedent since so: We now have the History Network, Discovery and the Learning Channel running many programs PRETENDING there is Biblical evidence and treating the Bible as a varified history book.
It's fucking ridiculous and feeding this delusion fundies used to get only from their church.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
