how come, if "there have been billions and billions of years," we're only in the year 2007?
84 comments
Ohh, you got me good! I'm now a young-Earth creationist, because of your fantabulous, ironclad argument!
Post Of The Month. Such hilarious stupidity needs credit. This is a riot.
After he(she?) wins PotM, he(she?) needs to be sterilized. As uproariously stupid as this is, this person cannot be allowed to breed.
Counterquestion: How come, if "the world is 6,000 years old," we're only in the year 2007? Huh? Huh?
~David D.G.
Actually, that's a proper question, coming from the mouth of a 2-year-old.
Either we have a quite precocious toddler at the keyboard, or someone with an IQ somewhere between 5 and 20.
She later adds: "Where does BC turn into AD for the scientists?"
Her argument is really that scientists believe in Jesus, but are hiding it. Still stupid, but at least slighty less than it appeared at the first time.
This has to be a troll. It has to be. My brain will not accept that people could actually be this stupid. The Western world uses a calendar based off of Christian Mythology, and a Christian fundie can't wrap their tiny head around it. I have to go do something that won't destroy my brain cells as quickly as this now. Like huffing paint thinner.
because thousands of heavily armed psychopaths, and those they relayed the message to, listened to a guy at an altar telling them it was 1582, and that anyone who disagred was gonna take a short vacation away from their limbs.
the dating system itself is still in use today, but the actual year was sorta masked by the fact that they didn't have much in the way of geological studies back then (if any) or dating methods, and were going by a stack of myths that keeps on contradicting itself.
Other calenders are NOT 2007 right now.
Islamic: 1429 or so I believe.
Hebrew: 5767
Iranian: 1385.
All it takes is for you to set a "day 1/year 1", decide on number of hours/days/weeks/months in a year, and count up from there. You could even do it for yourself: 00 or 01 (wanna start with a year 0 or not?), year of Not-Andy.
just don't expect anyone to follow it. People just adopt whichever one's most convenient/popular to keep transactions and relative timekeeping simpler.
http://isotropic.org/date/
Gregorian: Thursday, 15 March 2007
Mayan: Long count = 12.19.14.2.12; tzolkin = 2 Eb; haab = 5 Cumku
French: 25 Ventôse an 215 de la Révolution
Islamic: 25 Safar 1428
Hebrew: 25 Adar 5767
Julian: 2 March 2007
ISO: Day 4 of week 11 of 2007
Persian: 24 Esfand 1385
Ethiopic: 6 Magabit 1999
Coptic: 6 Baramhat 1723
Chinese: Cycle 78, year 24 (Ding-Hai), month 1 (Ren-Yin), day 26 (Wu-Shen)
Julian day: 2454175
Day of year: Day 74 of 2007; 291 days remaining in the year
Discordian: Prickle-Prickle, Discord 1, Year of Our Lady of Discord 3173
That's because the calender is based on, oh now what is it again? Oh yeah, RELIGON! Surprise, surprise.
That's because the calender is based on, oh now what is it again? Oh yeah, RELIGION! Surprise, surprise.
<< I wonder why people do not know that the calender years were not invented by scientists but by rulers and priests...the only time I know where a scientist has had direct influence on the calender - is when a one realised that the rotation around the earth is 365.25 instead of 365 and we skipped about two months. (I believe later there was the realisation that it was .24.) >>
Scott: Actually, it's 365.242195, according to one source I read. But what's a few seconds per millennium between friends?
~David D.G.
Sigh, if only those monks had read a little Hawkings, this whole confusion would never have happened...
So "not", if we're going to live forever, why do we bother marking time at all?
English words have no way of conveying what I am thinking right now.
It is a complex set of emotions, involving many *headdesk*s, "WHY??!"s and the full spectrum from fear to anger to sheer, dumbfounded horror and straight off of the cliffs of things man was not meant to know.
Because we are in the year 2007 AD, the system of numbering years from the alleged year of birth of Jesus, not from when the world came into existence.
Ouch, I think my head just imploded trying to understand the stupidity of that question :(
Actually, it's just us atheist trying to deceive you, you see, if we can convince the whole world it's year 2007 then the liberals can take over the government and stop all religion and destroy the ten commandments.
"how come, if "there have been billions and billions of years," we're only in the year 2007?"
Here's a better question, and also a paraphrasal of one of my favourite quotes; How did your brain learn human speech?
On a side note, assuming that this fundie thinks that the year 0 coincides with Jesus' birth and that there have only been 2007 years so far, this would mean that Mary cannot have born Jesus, because she would not have had enough time to become a young woman, able to bear a child.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.