"Archaeology cannot prove that the Bible is God's written word to us."
No shit.
"However, archaeology can (and does) substantiate the Bible's historical accuracy."
Accuracy? Ha! Naming a bunch of well known civilizations and putting them in the general area of where they actually existed is about as accurate as your Babble gets as far as archaeology is concerned.
"Archaeologists have consistently discovered the names of government officials, kings, cities, and festivals mentioned in the Bible when historians didn't think such people or places ever existed."
Bullshit. While they do find names and places that agree, which is to be expected since your Babble was written in the area, it's highly unlikely that the archaeologists had no fucking clue about the existence of any of them until they consulted your book of bullshit.
"Archaeology consistently confirms the historical accuracy of the Bible and there is no empirical science that conflicts with scripture."
All science conflicts with your precious scripture. It's all fucking wrong about damned near everything.
Archaeology only confirms what we already knew, that your Wholly Babble was written in the area it claims to have been written in and as evidence of that we find names and places mentioned that actually exist. Big deal.
