Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of the bible? I would have thought that science involved more than belief, in this area, however, it doesn't.
We must consider that God really seems to have created it, and that your so called science is religious balderdash!!!
33 comments
"Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of the bible?"
But the bible *is* something you can't prove at all. Why do you believe in it?
[Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of the bible?]
Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flies in the face of centuries of reproducible observations and verifiable data?
[I would have thought that science involved more than belief, in this area, however, it doesn't.]
There's *ample* proof. Look into it.
[We must consider that God really seems to have created it, and that your so called science is religious balderdash!!!]
You don't want to believe in science? Fine.
I'm curious, though--how did you post your message on this forum? Did you write it using clay tablets, or did you use something more sophisticated?
Bertrand Russell had this to say about religion: "I wish to propose for the reader's favourable consideration a doctrine which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The doctrine in question is this: that it is undesirable to believe in a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true."
You have concrete proof for god? And that pi = 3 and that insects have 4 legs and that there was a world wide flood?
Whn you do, then show me and I just might be tempted to look again.
Welcome to fundie world, where bible=science and science=religion, but in a bad way and religion still = religion, but in a good way. No, we haven't worked it out yet either.
Other way around, brah. Other way around.
Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of plain fucking logic? I would have thought that fucking third grade goddamn logic involved more than belief.
We must consider that MAN really seems to have created it, and that your so called "god" is religious balderdash!!!!1
I can prove it. We have fossils. We have DNA.
Plus it really makes sense, on a deep, personal, heartfelt, "Darwindidit" level.
So-called science is religious balderdash.
So-called religion is pseudo-scientific flapdoodle.
dad is an asshat.
!!! are waiting, on their heads, for a fourth for bridge.
"Why believe in something you can't prove at all...religious balderdash!!!"
I couldn't agree more with your first and last sentence fragment. Were there words in between that I should have not tuned out as the baseless ravings of a Creationist? Who can say?
Exactly. So why DO you believe in the biblical account of creation? You know, since there are two contradicting stories?
If you weren't dad I'd wonder if there was some way to convince you of your stupidity. But after that thread about the changing speed of light post-fall, it's quite clear that you're long past saving.
We not only have the fossils, we also have the particle accelerators, the rockets, the Tesla coils and the telescopes. We fucking pwn your ass, not just on Mondays, but every single day of the week.
Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of the bible?
You can't even prove most of the bible.
I would have thought that science involved more than belief, in this area, however, it doesn't.
Yes it does, science provides evidence to support their claims. The bible on the other hand does not.
We must consider that God really seems to have created it,
Proof please.
and that your so called science is religious balderdash!!!
Yeah, it's all balderdash, until you want to watch tv, go to the other end of town, or get sick.
"science is religious balderdash!!!"
So stop using electricity, transistors, computers and the internet.
idiot
“Why believe in something you can't prove at all, and which actually flys in the face of the bible?”
You not accepting the evidence, or not understanding the evidence, or flat out lying and denying the evidence, is not a reason for me to reject the science.
Your bible not tallying with history is not a reason to care about the bible.
"I would have thought that science involved more than belief, in this area, however, it doesn't.”
I’m sure you believe that. But you’re wrong.
“We must consider that God really seems to have created it,”
Nope. No need at all to weigh that or any other gods myths.
“and that your so called science is religious balderdash!!!”
Oooooh. Three exclamation points! That’s hard to counter. But i feel a need to try. Here goes. Okay?
Nope.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.