Exotheology and exobiology are pseudosciences relating to a belief in extraterrestrial life, or life in outer space. This was a liberal belief system pushed in the middle of the 20th century by scientists and politicians, often to advance political objectives like nuclear disarmament, globalism, environmentalism, and communism.
31 comments
Ahh, good old Conservapedia.
I still think the funniest thing about them is their fanatical, yet inconsistent, prudishness. They're quite happy to condemn anal sex in all its detail, but they refuse to allow even the existence of basic pages about what sex is.
Prager said:
Why are disarmament and environmentalism bad/evil? Can someone please explain this to me?
Because they prevent fundies from destroying the world at an ever-increasing rate, thereby stalling the Rapture and preventing us heathens from burning for all eternity while the righteous watch us from their balcony seats.
At least, that's what the fundies tell me.
As for those political objectives, I don't think they're as bad as you think they are:
Nuclear disarmament: Provided its mutual and people stick to their agreements, I'd say having fewer weapons of mass destruction sounds like a good idea.
Globalism: Developing countries get a helping hand, but at the cost of jobs elsewhere. Meanwhile, with more unity in the world, more countries can work together to prevent injustices. A great deal of good, some bad, but not especially evil if handled properly.
Environmentalism: How could taking better care of our planet NOT be a good thing?
Communism: Not really evil, just so hard to put into place on a large scale that it just doesn't work.
It is my personal, crazy conspiracy theory, that conservapedia was created by the makers of wikipedia in order to increase the credibility of their product.
Now, although they cannot deny that they are essentially a facts-by-popular-decision based design, they can at least point to their wacky conservative shadow-site and cry, "HEY! We're damned accurate! Look at what we COULD be!"
I'm halfway interested in finding a wiki dedicated to cataloguing various conspiracy theories and adding it.
Erm, no. Exobiology is pretty much science, because it is scientifically plausible. Extremophiles, organic compounds and liquid water oceans on distant moons and whatnot.
As for nuclear disarmament... yes please. Now. Like, ship all nuclear weapons on earth into the sun ASAP. We have enough of them to sterilize the earth of all life, and for what? What the heck do we need them for? Mindless destruction? Nice.
conservapedia is fucking hilarious, i once edited the article on new zealand saying that is was a japanese and russian colony before the british took it over, and it stayed there for several weeks before someone realised
In a way, he's right. Just think how foolish, ignorant, & violent we would look to alien species.
Aliens showing up would shatter fundamentalism in a million pieces overnight. Does ET need Jesus too?
No wonder they are afraid.
Well, what do you know, it appears that exotheology actually exists. Of course, the links in the "See also" sending to pages about Raelism, UFO religions and an UFO-believing exorcist cardinal tell us all we need about the credibility of this "science".
I once attended a lecture on exobiology delivered by Jack Cohen.
First, exobiology is a science, not a pseudoscience. For pseudoscience, see Intelligent Design.
Second, it is not based on a belief in extraterrestrial life. Science is not the same as belief, moron. In fact, what it's based on is attempting to answer three questions: "What are the chances of life developing somewhere else in the universe?" "If such life were to exist, what would it be like?" "If such life were to exist, how would it develop?"
Thirdly, I must be made of fail if I can't see how this even remotely relates to disarmament, globalism, environmentalism and communism. And I can't.
Fourthly, I'm aware that the three questions exobiology asked are of little practical benefit... Until you plug into the exobiology model conditions on Earth, in which case exobiology overwhelmingly supports the prevailing scientific view of life on earth: which is to say that creationism is full of shit. It may also have been a cunning ploy to encourage impressionable young kids to get interested in science. Scientists recruit kids even more than gays do, dontchaknow?
Fifthly, your 'article' only cites one source, albeit five times encompassing two articles from said source. That's bad enough in itself, but when citing articles, you have to make sure your words bear some resemblance to the content of said articles, and not just stuff you made up. Essays do not work that way.
How does that promote any of those?
It's not like you have some lie that you use to advance the causes of homophobia, misogyny, restriction of education, and hatred of all things not exactly like you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.