Incredible irony, Poe's Law may apply. Wants to oppress people for the risk of hearing something they find inconvenient, because supposedly that is oppression. Would like to corrupt policy to be able to legally oppress non-believers.
But you will not only hear inconvenient things from atheists, especially when "atheist" is the typical fundamentalist straw man, which "hate God" suggests. What about actual atheists, who just need evidence to believe in something, due to critical thinking skills but more importantly, due to the lack of evidence and your inability to provide some? What about all other believers in other deities who just don't worship exactly your version?
This stresses the importance of the separation of church and state.
Don't expect everybody to agree with you on public gaming forums. Join your church's forum if they have one. Learn to care less when people disagree with you, or attempt to evaluate the merit of their arguments. Live and let live. If someone no longer wants to chat with you, it's not because they "hate God", it may just be that they're tired of your frivolous attacks. Or maybe you're spamming where it doesn't belong. You're not God.
Private forums can ban members and delete posts, they're not government-run and not subject to free speech laws, so it depends on the moderators and site's rules, the same for wikis.
Stay on Conservapedia if that's where you feel understood, but be aware that for most people including Christians, it's only a source of unreasonable extremist material. It was founded by someone who cannot tolerate mainstream knowledge and mainstream encyclopedias and even wanted to rewrite the Bible for it to only promote abuse and bigotry. The message of Jesus and pre-corruption early Pauline tradition is called "liberal corruption" by that crackpot. Know what you're into.
