Andy Schlafly #fundie

Andy Schlafly #fundie conservapedia.com

Negative numbers were not fully accepted by mathematicians until the 1800s, including how a negative number dominates the result in multiplication with a positive number, to yield a negative outcome. Yet Jesus's parable of the sower and the seed, in Matthew 13:1-23, Mark 4:1-8, and Luke 8:4-8, explained the same effect nearly 2000 years earlier.

38 comments

old comment by Canadiest

@The Duelist

Domionist welfare, hes a sub-industry of his mommys theocratic empire. The whole site was created to praise up right-wing fundamentalist politicians and personalities, by lying, and to tear down liberal figures, by lying. Along the way they could push their "America was created as a Christian nation" and " The Bible has the answrs for everything" propaganda, as we see here.

@anevilmeme

They don't do any explanations because their audience doesn't care for reason, it's enough for them to be told that it relates somehow. This is , as you've noticed, a very common gimmick with these people. It's gotten so widespread in their camp that Barton said the constitution is "verbatim" from the Bible but when his verses were compared they weren't even related, his camp just doesn't care, the JUST WANT the assertion to be believed.

The biggest scam they push, or at least the most common and most repeated is that "America got it's laws from the ten commandments" when only two are crimes and those two are universal in societies and preceded even the Torah by thousands of years. Doesn't phase their audience a bit, Glenn Beck just sputtered that lie out again yesterday and several politicians include that in almost every speech. If you tell a lie often enough,,,

old comment by Anon-e-moose

The ancient Chinese invented negative numbers. Y'know, Andy: ancient. As in their civilisation - and their astronomical & mathematical achievements - existed way before your 'Jesus'.

The number 'O', Zero, didn't exist until the ancient Mayans invented & used it in their numerical system. If not for their invention, we wouldn't have Binary - the basis of Digital Computers - and you wouldn't have your Conservapoodia, nor your Bible Raping Project.

Nope, not seeing any mention of Colossus/Z1 (the first digital computers - in Europe) re. your 'scientifically [i]fore[/i]knowledgeable Bible' o Andy Schaftafly.

@Creedence Leonore Gielgud

Yet, Prof. Stephen Hawking has proved the existence of at least eleven dimensions. Funny then, that Andy's precious Bible doesn't state that verbatim, nor give explanations for such, with diagrams, equations etc. But then, his precious Bible says that Pi = exactly 3, so when not even his 'omnipotent' God could build a wheel on the basis of his own mathematical model, then Andy himself proves that an English theoretical physicist is superior to God.

And Andy thinks we Brits 'can't do the maths'? When he relies on something invented & developed by a gay, Atheist Englishman, then...! [/mega-irony]

@Canadiest

Yet, his Conservapoodia has been universally panned by conservative correspondents/reporters/bloggers etc, who all say he doesn't represent them, and when all right-wing fundamentalist preachers/pastors/governing bodies won't touch his raped Bible 'project' with someone else's 50-foot cattleprod, then...!

Can you say 'Vanity Project', Andy? I know you can.

old comment by TimeToTurn

So why can't any of you Biblical scientific foreknowledge crew (and your cousins the Koranical scientific foreknowledge crew) use it to help push the next breakthrough of technologies? Yeah, we know about negative numbers, those Heathen Chinese and Indians knew about them before Jesus was even born.

Have your pals Matthew, Mark, Luke (and John, too, all of the Johns, even the crazy one in Revelation) help solve some pressing scientific issues and questions. I'm sure you'd like the name "Andy Schlafly" to be remembered as a great theologian, scholar, and scientist, not some crazy wingnut who tried to rewrite the Bible to make it conservative.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Creedence Leonore Gielgud

"He had iron chariots to contend with. "IRON" chariots!"

image

And which country - in WWI - invented the Tank, becoming in less than a century the God-Killer* you see above: the Challenger II, o Andy Schaftafly...?! >:D

*- Remember how it was discovered in the first "Transformers" film, that high-heat Saboted rounds with magnesium cores could harm Cybertronians? Who's to say that today's Irov Chariots couldn't fire saboted rounds with iron cores: God Killers, o Andy?!

But of course, not just our Challenger IIs. There's also the little matter of your country's M-1 Abrams, France's Leclercs, Germany's Leopard IIs, Israel's Merkavas ([/Irony]), Russia's T-90s, China's Type 99s, and North Korea's Pokpung Ho's. No wonder your precious Goddy-woddy won't show his face round here - or can't - as via that little Biblical exploit, the Creation is now superior to the Creator, so where does that leave your 'Biblical scientific hindknowledge', seeing as not even your 'God' had/has the hindsight to have realised said exploit, certainly ensured it's inclusion in his foreknowledgeable 'Word', if he supposedly possesses foreknowledge...?! >:D

...oh, and what do you bet, o CLG, that this 'Iron Chariot' exploit is changed/erased 'Memory Hole'-esque from his Bible Raping Project; mayhaps sometime after our mentioning such...?!

old comment by Pule Thamex

It's nice to see Andy confirm what I've been saying for years, and if may be allowed to further reinforce Andy's example with another of my own, I'd like to relate the Biblical evidence for Pauli's exclusion principle which states:- No two identical fermions in a system, such as electrons in an atom, can have an identical set of quantum numbers.

We can find the Biblical proof for this in Deuteronomy as follows:-

23:10 If there be among you any man, that is not clean by reason of uncleanness that chanceth him by night, then shall he go abroad out of the camp, he shall not come within the camp:

23:11 But it shall be, when evening cometh on, he shall wash himself with water: and when the sun is down, he shall come into the camp again.

23:12 Thou shalt have a place also without the camp, whither thou shalt go forth abroad:

23:13 And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee:

P.S. I hope I'm not getting confused with Pauli's extrusion principle.

Andy Schlafly #fundie conservapedia.com

38 comments

Confused?