Edmond #fundie christianforums.com

[After starting a thread on <a href="http://www.christianforums.com/t2377830-quote-mining-no-fact-stating-s-j-gould-essay-disclosing-the-debacle-of-darwin’s-ev.html" target="_blank">Stephen Jay Gould's essay Opus 200</a>, the <a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_opus200.html" target="_blank">essay's source</a> goes offline a few days later.]

What a Co-ikeedink! Today, Gould’s Opus 200 is Apparently No Longer Present on Web.

This thread is related to the thread— Quote Mining? No, Fact Stating. S J Gould Essay Disclosing the Debacle of Darwin’s Ev,— due to associated reference materials that have been discovered to have been subsequently removed from the web.

After a year of visiting this reference of S J Gould’s Opus 200 Essay on the Web, <a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/libr...ld_opus200.html" target="_blank">http://www.stephenjaygould.org/libr...ld_opus200.html</a> [link is broken, that's how it appears in the post] , still active just a couple of days ago when I posted the thread,.."Quote Mining? No, Fact Stating. S J Gould Essay Disclosing the Debacle of Darwin’s Ev" —.today gives this reply upon request for accuse —The page cannot be displayed.


What a co-inkeedink. This may be part of the magic of how evolutionary information—.can appear—and then just—.disappear—. all based, of course, on its validation or invalidate of the desired conclusions and perceptions that are desired to be presented—. Zap, Zap —its like reading a story about Harry Potter.

You don’t suppose there may have been same ‘persuasion’ applied to — make it disappear. No,—of course not, this couldn't be based on the coincidence that the site may have gotten several hundred hits, or more, during the past two day and its publisher may have received some negative responses as a result of its content.

Why that’s unthinkable. Such a notion would be preposterous. It’s a universal and well known fact that the evolutionist community is far too fair and objective about the issues relating to the subject of evolution to ever dream of selectively screening any information on the subject from easy access to the public.

They are much too open with all information whether pro or con as its applies to the subject of evolution. Why the record of their balanced public educational policies stand as a living testimony of that fact? Surely evolutionary web sites would not censure information perceived to challenge any aspect of evolutionary credibilty.

Before today the page was found ‘occupied’ through Google, Stephen Jay Gould Opus 200 or equivalent. The choice displayed is —. Stephen Jay Gould, “Opus 200,” 1991. If you locate another copy of Gould’s essay Opus 200 on the web, not evolutionist commentary about the essay, (they're still there) or if this site comes back on line let me know. I’ll be very surprised to get many takers for that request from the evolutionist group —.

13 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.