Bestiality
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?
Sorry evo's but everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality. So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals. Even children can tell the difference bewteen animals and humans and deep down inside, I think evolutionists really can also. So your game is exposed.
53 comments
What?
Imbecile!
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality
An animal. As which you accepted man to be for the sake of the argument.
So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals.
You accepted humans to be animals, and that sex between humans is betiality. After that you claim that humans have to have sex with animals and from that follows that human sex is not bestiality therefore evolution is false.
This contradicts the premises that humans are animals and that sex between humans is bestiality. Therefore your arguments fail horribly. Even if they were somehow based on logic.
This guy confuses evolution and bestiality. Following your logic I should say that ALL animals commit bestiality. Now, bestiality is sex with two animals of DIFFERENT families and/or Spices. And of course, humans are ANIMALS, intelligent and with soul but animals anyway(the proof is that, in order to reproduce, we DO mate)
No genius, bestiality is sex between humans and animals of a different species.
Yes. You're right. Evolutionists are SO stupid that they are incapable of distinguishing between species or understanding that animals from different species can't generally sexually reproduce (with the exception of ligers, mules, etc.)
Here, Crosisimage
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?
Some humans can look rather bestial when they mate, but unless they take at page out of a certain pigs-molesting fundie's book and proceed to sexually assault livestock it isn't bestiality/zoophilia.
If we are not animals (belonging to the animal kingdom), then by definition we are plants... WTF?
I reiterate my opinion that the fundies (of Yuggoth) are fungi.
And Internet Puppy has a message for you, Carico:
image
mammal animals of the class Mammalia, including humans , characterized by a covering of hair on the skin and, in the female, milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young.
image
"Part of the evil evolutionist conspiracy"
Evolutionist are the only ones to believe humans are animals? I missed that class.
So, let's assume, for the sake of the argument, that bestiality is sex between animals. so you say:
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct? Sorry evo's...
Wait a minute. Is "evo" an insult now?
How much longer before someone calls me a "helio" or a "rounder?"
Oh, wait, there actually are people who deny heliocentrism and a round Earth.
...but everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality.
Yes. Any member of the kingdom animalia that does not belong to the phylum Chordata , subphylum vertebrata , superclass tetrapoda , class mammalia , subclass eutheria , superorder euarchonto , order primates , suborder haplorrhini , infraorder Simiiformes , parvorder catarrhini , superfamily hominoidea , family hominidae , subfamily homininae , tribe hominini , subtribe hominina , genus homo , species homo sapien .
Does that help clear things up?
So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals.
Ah, so your "argument" is as follows:
1. Bestiality means having sex with animals of different species.
2. But maybe it means just having sex with animals
3. Humans are animals.
4. Sex between humans is not bestiality.
5. But maybe it is. Therefore,
6. I think about sex waaaay too much.
Even children can tell the difference bewteen animals and humans...
A child of four could understand this. Get me a child of four! I can't make head or tail of it!
You know, you probably ought to consider that saying: "Well, little kids agree with me" isn't exactly strengthening your position.
...and deep down inside, I think evolutionists really can also.
So aside from stupid definition games and straw men, your final argument is: "You know I'm right deep down inside."
Make sure you add that to the fallacy list. It's the Argument from You-KNOW-I'm-Right or, if you want it more poetic and alliterative, the Argumentum ad Arrogance.
So your game is exposed.
Carico, all you did was build a straw man, knock it down, juggle a few definitions, and proclaim that we already think you're right.
Although you have exposed yourself as being thoroughly obsessed over the kind of sexual acts you oft proclaim legalized gay marriage would lead to.
If we are not animals (belongig to the animal kingdom), then by definition we are plants... WTF?
Only if plants and animals were all there are.
Don't forget about fungi, eubacteria, archaeobaceria, and protista.
Animals also engage in bestiality. For example, dolphins fuck killer whales and sharks(and in the former, they´re able to produce fertile offsprings). They just don´t give a damn about morality, because they don´t have free will. And what has it to do with evolution anyway?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
