Bestiality
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?
Sorry evo's but everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality. So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals. Even children can tell the difference bewteen animals and humans and deep down inside, I think evolutionists really can also. So your game is exposed.
55 comments
What?
No. Bestiality involves sex between two animals of DIFFERENT species. So maybe you commit it, seeing as you're not intelligent enough to be human, but that's not how it works for the rest of us.
Imbecile!
Bestiality is NOT incompatible with the concept of humans as animals.
Once again, I LOVE the fundy obsession with various forms of sex. Evolution leads to bestiality!
Teh Ghey! It's everywhere! If we let people of the same sex marry, then we'll have to let people marry animals.
Ugh. Fundy burns so bad!
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality.
Your statement: Humans are animals, therefore sex between humans ois bestiality.
everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality
An animal. As which you accepted man to be for the sake of the argument.
So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals.
You accepted humans to be animals, and that sex between humans is betiality. After that you claim that humans have to have sex with animals and from that follows that human sex is not bestiality therefore evolution is false.
This contradicts the premises that humans are animals and that sex between humans is bestiality. Therefore your arguments fail horribly. Even if they were somehow based on logic.
This guy confuses evolution and bestiality. Following your logic I should say that ALL animals commit bestiality. Now, bestiality is sex with two animals of DIFFERENT families and/or Spices. And of course, humans are ANIMALS, intelligent and with soul but animals anyway(the proof is that, in order to reproduce, we DO mate)
No genius, bestiality is sex between humans and animals of a different species.
And....
Even children can tell the difference between science and fundie religion attempting to masquerade as science, I think fundies deep down inside can too. So your game is exposed.
Yes. You're right. Evolutionists are SO stupid that they are incapable of distinguishing between species or understanding that animals from different species can't generally sexually reproduce (with the exception of ligers, mules, etc.)
What a sublimely moronic argument. I think I read your brief in court yesterday.
Here, Crosis
image
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?
Some humans can look rather bestial when they mate, but unless they take at page out of a certain pigs-molesting fundie's book and proceed to sexually assault livestock it isn't bestiality/zoophilia.
If we are not animals (belonging to the animal kingdom), then by definition we are plants... WTF?
I reiterate my opinion that the fundies (of Yuggoth) are fungi.
And Internet Puppy has a message for you, Carico:
image
mammal
Any of various warm-blooded vertebrate animals of the class Mammalia, including humans , characterized by a covering of hair on the skin and, in the female, milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young.
image
"Part of the evil evolutionist conspiracy"
Evolutionist are the only ones to believe humans are animals? I missed that class.
I think Carico applied the 'If I love god then god love me' equation to humans ergo, 'If humans are animals then animals are human.'
Let's try that with other factors ..
If I am tall then tall am I (damn, works)
If evolutionist are right the right are evolutionst (liking that one!)
If food cures hunger then hunger cures food (I'll take Sensless for $100, Alex)
If we jog to work for our health, then our health works to .. jog us .. health jogs us to ...
You know, I shouldn't try disecting a fundie after being awake for 24 hours ... and counting ...
So, let's assume, for the sake of the argument, that bestiality is sex between animals. so you say:
1)Evolutionists say humans are animals
2)if humans are animals then their sex is bestiality
3)humans need to mate with animals for their sex to be bestiality
4)As humans are not animals, their sex is not bestiality, therefore evolutionists are wrong.
so, you know that humans are not animals because their sex is not bestiality, and you know their sex is not bestiality because humans are not animals. Wait, that reminds me of something... oh yeah, circular reasoning.
Also, since when are children's opinions what define modern science?
Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?
No.
Bestiality is sex between animals of different species.
Lion + Human = Yes.
Lion + Lioness = No.
Human + Human = No.
Your Mother + Your Father = Yes. (I'm presuming.)
Sorry evo's...
Wait a minute. Is "evo" an insult now?
How much longer before someone calls me a "helio" or a "rounder?"
Oh, wait, there actually are people who deny heliocentrism and a round Earth.
...but everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality.
Yes. Any member of the kingdom animalia that does not belong to the phylum Chordata , subphylum vertebrata , superclass tetrapoda , class mammalia , subclass eutheria , superorder euarchonto , order primates , suborder haplorrhini , infraorder Simiiformes , parvorder catarrhini , superfamily hominoidea , family hominidae , subfamily homininae , tribe hominini , subtribe hominina , genus homo , species homo sapien .
Does that help clear things up?
So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals.
Ah, so your "argument" is as follows:
1. Bestiality means having sex with animals of different species.
2. But maybe it means just having sex with animals
3. Humans are animals.
4. Sex between humans is not bestiality.
5. But maybe it is. Therefore,
6. I think about sex waaaay too much.
Even children can tell the difference bewteen animals and humans...
A child of four could understand this. Get me a child of four! I can't make head or tail of it!
You know, you probably ought to consider that saying: "Well, little kids agree with me" isn't exactly strengthening your position.
...and deep down inside, I think evolutionists really can also.
So aside from stupid definition games and straw men, your final argument is: "You know I'm right deep down inside."
Make sure you add that to the fallacy list. It's the Argument from You-KNOW-I'm-Right or, if you want it more poetic and alliterative, the Argumentum ad Arrogance.
So your game is exposed.
Carico, all you did was build a straw man, knock it down, juggle a few definitions, and proclaim that we already think you're right.
Although you have exposed yourself as being thoroughly obsessed over the kind of sexual acts you oft proclaim legalized gay marriage would lead to.
If we are not animals (belongig to the animal kingdom), then by definition we are plants... WTF?
Only if plants and animals were all there are.
Don't forget about fungi, eubacteria, archaeobaceria, and protista.
Animals also engage in bestiality. For example, dolphins fuck killer whales and sharks(and in the former, they´re able to produce fertile offsprings). They just don´t give a damn about morality, because they don´t have free will. And what has it to do with evolution anyway?
“Since evolutionists believe that humans are animals, then they must believe that sex between humans is bestiality. Is that correct?”
MAN, you’re desperate to denigrate, aren’t you?
No, that’s not correct. Bestiality is cross-species, not within a species.
“Sorry evo's but everyone knows what a human has to mate with in order to engage in bestiality”
Everyone but you, evidently.
“So you're not fooling anyone except those who are also fooling themselves, by claiming that humans are animals.”
The only reason you dispute the observation is the connotations you add to ‘animal.’
“Even children can tell the difference bewteen animals and humans and deep down inside, I think evolutionists really can also”
No, we’re pretty comfortable with teh actual definition of ‘animal,’ not the connotations you’re taking as part of the definition.
“So your game is exposed.”
It’s not a game, nor deceit, nor a secret. YOUR game is just pathetic.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.