(Picture of Horsehead Nebula)
Take a look at this picture. Aesthetically, it is beautiful; but epistemologically, it is a testimony to what sin can do. A nebula, the shell of a star that once housed an angel. An angel that chose to "leave his first estate" and come here to cohabit with the women. It now serves as a warning beacon to any other angel that may want to follow in their steps. Aesthetically beautiful, hamartologically ugly - ugly as sin.
(Picture of Grand Canyon)
DITTO
68 comments
So angels live in stars, which explode when they have sex with human women; and the same goes for patches of dirt and rock, which ... spontaneously excavate?
What the purple hoo-hah fuck religion are you following? Christianity's batty, but nothing like this.
Yeah? Well acoustooptically, it's very poetic. And it's anacamptically interesting in it's formation. Of course, contrapuntally, it is the very antithesis of everything you believe in AV, though someone as holoblastically challenged as yourself probably can't see that. While quincuncially deficient in many ways, the HH nebula is still awesome when observed equinoctially.
(Those are all real words, BTW.)
"A nebula, the shell of a star that once housed an angel." DUDE! The Horsehead Nebula isn't even a stellar remnant, like (say) the Crab Nebula or Ring Nebula. It's just an interstellar dust cloud. We can see it because it's lit up by Sigma Orionis.
If you're going to claim that exploding stars are the result of departing angels, at least use something that's actually connected with an exploding star as your example!
Astronomy is a sin now? Yep, that's one more thing I enjoy that's on the "Thou shalt not" list, if you let the imaginagion run too wild and take bad drugs. BTW, AV1611VET, the horsehead nebula is angel jis. And the Milky Way is God's wet dream.
Actually, no.
The horsehead nebula is actually a navigational beacon for green, three-handed transdimensional pan-stellar beings from the planet Ten.
Get your facts straight, AV. You sound ridiculous.
"epistemologically"? "hamartologically"?
According to my spelling-checker, those aren't even *words*!
EDIT: @David B. -- I love you, man. <word geek> Say, do you do crosswords, by any chance?
The Horsehead nebula is just a puff of gas lit by starlight with another puff of gas (dark) in front of it.
Astronomer: Do you see that puff of gas, that's almost in shape like a horse?
BTW, it's harmatological (re: the study of sin), not hamartological.
I swear, this is the third time I've seen this quote posted here. It's stupid as hell, and definitely fundie, but not worth repeating.
Or it could, y'know, just be a nebula, with none of this weird-ass angel nonsense attached to it, although that could make a neat science fiction story.
(Maybe that's where the Angel Islington came from.)
Aye, because all women are the incarnation of evil and can even tempt mythological creatures. :eyeroll:
Your head, you must pull it out of your ass, AV.
Must have been a huge angel.
How did he even fit it into-
WAIT I THOUGHT NEBULAS CAME BEFORE STARS NOT AFTER THEM
So the Grand Canyon was made by an angel fucking a mortal babe?
That's some fucking hot and heavy sex right there, Vet my boy.
I feel my reaction to this gibberish can best be expressed by song.
"Who you tryin' to get crazy with ese?
To da one on da flamboyant tip
Don't make me wreck shit, hectic
Oh, makin' my mind slow
Insane in da membrane
Presumably the sex that created the Horsehead Nebula wasn't as hot as the sex that created the Grand Canyon. In this respect we are quite lucky.
Or is it that the further away from earth the angel travels to get his rocks off, the bigger the resulting explosion?
DITTO
Ditto... Ditto ?! You provincial putz!
-Hedl ey Lamarr (Harvey Korman), "Blazing Saddles"
Also, Pareidolia. It's a thing.
It's a testimony to the epic steaming logical shite you have for a brain, AV1611VET.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
