[First ever Sikh GAY Anand karaj - Wedding ceremony]
Sikhs or others, this whole Gay marriage thing is SICK!
If two people want to do their un-natural thing in private, let them have it. But to have this sick behavior legally recognized as marriage! It is an insult to the institution of marriage!
Scientists say most gays are born that way due to a kink in their brains, and others due to certain culture. OK, so let us tolerate the behavior until a medical cure is found. But one doesn't have to use this birth defect to derail the sanctity of marriage.
I bet the next thing to be legally recognised as marriage would be:
1. Sex with animals
2. Polygamy
53 comments
I can understand that fundies aren´t used to have gay marriage sanctioned by the state.
After all their normal response to gays (according to the bible) was to kill them (Lev. 20:13; Romans 1:24-32)
Considering all the things which were punishable to death according to the bible (especially the old testimony) I can understand that the fundamentalists think that we´re living in the end times (and makes me glad that I don´t live in a state that is ruled according to "gods laws" ;) )
I assume a state ruled by christian fundamentalists according to gds laws in the OT wuld commit greater atrocities than the third Reich did (ith gays, magicans/wiccans/fortune tellers and also atheists and believers of other religions being put to death [as well as female rape victims if the rape took place within a city])
Calling homosexuality unnatural: check.
Claiming the institution of marriage is under attack: check.
Acting like homosexuality is something that needs to be cured: check.
Slippery slope: check.
It's a homophobe grand slam!
There is no need to cure homosexuality just as there is no need to cure heterosexuality. It's not sick, or a kink in the brain. Why is same sex marriage bother you? It's not going to interfere with you marriage, nor anyone else's.
What is with you fundies that want to compare homosexuality with bestiality?
Next thing you know they'll allow the coloreds to get married. Or interfaith marriages. Or ATHEIST marriages!
It's a good thing society is protected from such evils.
I'm amazed he didn't trot out sex with kids though.
100 years ago:
If women want to unnaturally discuss politics in private, let them have it. But to have this sick behavior legally recognized by giving them the right to vote! It is an insult to the institution of democracy!
Scientists say most women interested in academics and politics are born that way due to a kink in their brains, and others due to certain culture. OK, so let us tolerate the behavior until a medical cure is found. But one doesn't have to use this birth defect to derail the sanctity of democracy.
I bet the next thing to be legally would be:
1. Animals voting
2. Voting for several candidates at once
3. Children voting
Same logic.
But one doesn't have to use this birth defect to derail the sanctity of marriage.
I wouldn't have gone so far as to call you a birth defect....
I bet the next thing to be legally recognised as marriage would be:
1. Sex with animals
2. Polygamy
Wow, it's like somebody sends you guys a checklist in the mail. I suppose I should be thankful that "#3: Sex with children" wasn't included this time. Seriously, fundies--what's with your obsession with beastiality and polygamy?
Wow, it's like somebody mails you guys a checklist in the mail. I suppose I should be thankful that "#3: Sex with children" wasn't included this time. Seriously, fundies--what's with your obsession with beastiality and polygamy?
What's awesome is that the same people who spout this bigoted nonsense often then turn around and say they've got nothing against gays.
"Teh ghey? Hey no prob, I think it's as bad as raping children, but heck, I got no problem with it, really. Hate the sinner, not the sin.. wait, how was that again?"
I really need to understand this. What is it about a fundie mindset that makes it "automatic" to go from sex between two consenting adult human beings to sex with animals? Because, I don't know any non-fundies who would even consider that concept.
Is there something in the fundie training manual about this? Because for as abnormal as that conclusion is among non fundie types, it is absolutely normal for fundies.
It's quite sickening, to be honest. Why do their minds go there? And, how do they manage to make that conclusion?
Cure left-handedness and brown eyes.. seeing as how THOSE are "kinks in the brain" also. Then we'll talk.
And you should be careful of stepping onto slippery slopes, you may fall and bust your ass.. oh, too late.
You sucked at connect the dots as a child, didn't you.
Likes the same sex =/= fucks animals
Likes the same sex =/= fucks many wives
Fucks many wives =/= fucks animals
Besides the matter, I don't see anything wrong with plural marriage, that's the man's problem.
So to fundies, an action/mindset/etc. that they don't agree with is a 'birth defect'?
I hate to Godwin, but...You know who ELSE thought people who were different were defects?
Stalin, too, had great success with his policy of labeling dissenters mentally ill. He, too, however, made the diagnosis up.
"It is an insult to the institution of marriage! "
No one gives a sweet fuck if you believe that your wisdom teeth feel insulted by my microwave oven. I would say to keep such mentally unhinged thoughts to yourself, but on second thought, tell us all about them. We need to know that you can't distinguish between your brainwashing and reality.
"But one doesn't have to use this birth defect to derail the sanctity of marriage."
You don't need to use the fact you were born to a social majority to cause needless pain to others, just because it gives you a sexual thrill. Talking about twisted brains...
"2. Polygamy"
There ARE people pushing for polygamy in the states, and they are generally as homophobic and ignorant as yourself.
/It is an insult to the institution of marriage!/
Yeah, nothing endorses the institution of marriage like straight celebrities marrying each other for only a few days, men having a whole harem of wives that are kept submissive and locked up like animals (paging Solomon), husbands beating up their wives with impunity, and elderly men marrying underage girls (paging the Texas polygamist scandal). Yeah, marriage between two consenting adults who love and respect each other, THAT really desecrates the institution of marriage.
Yohan, grow up.
Yeah its unnatural, that's why dolphins, bonobos, elephants, bunnies, and virtually every other species does it.
1. ...At least he didn't trot out the dead horse of pedophilia? But...yeah. Animals can't consent. Apply head to wall a few more times.
2. There's enough red tape involved when trying to marry one person. Don't wanna know about the paperwork and bother involved with marrying two or three or seventy-eight.
1. An animal cannot consent to anything. Two gay humans marrying is completely fucking different, idiot.
2. True polyamory extends the same multiple-partner rights to both men and women, who are all of age and consenting. It has nothing to do with homosexual marriage, they are completely unrelated. Its also not the bullshit that the FLDS practice, which is just a bunch of hoary old perv 'alpha' males mass-raping women and girls in the name of religion, and indoctrinating young men to perpetuate the cycle of abuse. If the young men are considered surplus, they are kicked out so the older men can hoard all the women. That is polygyny, NOT polygamy.
It is an insult to the institution of marriage!
And Brittney Spears's 55 hour just for fun marriage isnt?
Or what about that 50% divorce rate that you hetros have?
Oh, and polygamy is fine with your bible. You would have known that if you read it.
It's not a medical problem, and therefore will never have a cure. Get over it.
And why must you always bring polygamy and beastiality into this? It's a tad different, plus polygamy is fine according to your bible.
I find recognizing two hateful christian's marriage as legit is disturbing, but you dont see me bitching.
Maybe they should find a cure for christianity instead.
Oh and the polygamy and beastilaity have both been done.
When will the argument get old?!
And what's your problem with consensual polygamy? ... it's biblical. Well, not the consensual part.
Assuming Yohan is a Christian, I'm frankly surprised he didn't go at the fact the married couple is Sikh.
Then again I may just be jaded after being here so long.
"If two people want to do their un-natural thing in private, let them have it."
Homosexuality is found in nature. It IS natural.
"It is an insult to the institution of marriage! "
No, the divorce rate amoung the religious is.
"OK, so let us tolerate the behavior until a medical cure is found."
It's not a disease. You can't cure homosexuality anymore than you can "cure" someone's eye colour.
And what is it with fundies and fucking animals? Got some surpressed desires there Yohan?
1. Sex with animals
Like Neal Horsely? Also consent. You need to understand it
2. Polygamy
I mean it's not bad if all are consenting adults.
It is an insult to the institution of marriage!
So is divorce. And I'd like to point out that Josh Duggar had an Ashley Madison account.
Sex with animals
image
There are some paths one shouldn't go down, o fundies.
Least of all to that glass house of yours.
I'm just surprised you didn't include '3. Paedophilia'.
Or perhaps possessing enough hindsight to admit there would be the likes of Roy Less nearly a decade later to destroy not only that slippery slope once and for all.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.