Pasteur shows us that if you have a theory you have to run experments and test your theory. Even Indiana Jones after his summer adventure had to go back to the lab and his teaching job. Darwin never did any work in the lab. A scientiest balances his field work with research and experments in the lab to back up his results from out in the field. Darwin never did any of this. He just wrote books and that makes him a philosopher not a scientist. There is nothing wrong with philosophy, but it is not science, because there is no evidence or proof for it.

["Darwin was now an eminent geologist in the scientific élite of clerical naturalists, settled with a private income, while privately working on his theory. He had a vast amount of work to do, writing up all his findings and supervising the preparation of the multivolume Zoology, which would describe his collections. He embarked on extensive experiments with plants and consultations with animal husbanders, including pigeon and pig breeders, trying to find soundly based answers to all the arguments he anticipated when he presented his theory in public."]

"Animal husbanders" is a Creation Science term based on Adam being the first "husband".
So are you deconverting to becoming a Creationist now that you are using our langage?