That leads into a little trick i devised to refute evolution.
What are the odds that a ticghtly compacted particle containign all the matter in the universe could be made... pretty slim right? now what are the odds of it randomly occouring... even smaller right? now tell me the odds of it forming from nothing. You cant make nothing from nothing so that is a 0.0 repeating % chance
Ok in a new scenario its estimated all humans combined have less than 3% of all knowlede to be had. What are the odds that a god could be somwhere in that 97% of knowledge? it isn't impossable but because the person reading may be an atheist lets make it 0.000...0001
we all know 1 hextillianth of a percent is infinitly more than 0 right?
thus we know that the odds of ther ebeing a god are infinitly greater than there not being 1.
48 comments
Your calculations are amiss.
"What are the odds that a ticghtly compacted particle containign all the matter in the universe could be made... pretty slim right? now what are the odds of it randomly occouring... even smaller right? now tell me the odds of it forming from nothing."
First, your math sucks. Also, you are lumping multiple theories into one. "Big Bang" theory has nothing to do with evolution.
1x10-21 (I think that's one hextillianth...) is actually 1x10-21 th bigger than zero. 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1 is not infinity, as you can see.
Wait...if the probability of a god's existence is 1/N (N = one hextillion, whatever number that might be), then shouldn't the odds of there being no gods be 1 - 1/N? Seems to me that 1/N is hardly "infinitely greater" than 1 - 1/N. If anything, this is exactly the opposite of what he wanted.
Your "little trick" only works because you use imprecise mathematics. The chance of the big bang happening is irrelevant, as the universe clearly exists (to the extent that existence can be objectively defined). The simplest explanation is that it simply came into being. A God creating it would necessitate questioning the origin of said God. That simply adds a layer of arbitrary complexity on top of an already complex system.
Tzelemel: Please do not encourage an idiot like this. WE realize you're simply suggesting the possibility that he was right for the sake of argument; but if this retarded fucknozzle sees it, he'll be running through the streets shouting, "the atheists admitted I was right! Praise Gaawwd!"
You were pwned by Kant, and he's been dead for over two hundred years. What was the chance of that?
"Ok in a new scenario its estimated all humans combined have less than 3% of all knowlede to be had."
Given the massive amount of weather data from planets and stars we have note even discovered, it's more like 1 X 10 ^ -(10 ^ 1000). [Almost nothing]
And, since God supposedly created everything, he should be present in 100% of the known universe.
"we all know 1 hextillianth of a percent is infinitly more than 0 right?"
wtf
Study math sometime.
so, what are the odds that everything necessitates a creator, except for God, who is also capable of instantly creating highly-adapted life, and God has existed forever, thus He waited for an eternity before finally deciding to create something?
I find it hard to believe.
I love these people with their, you can't explain how the universe was formed so everything in the Bible must be correct.
If there is a higher power, he's shaking his head right now.
Amazingly, spellcheck offered no suggestions for 'hextillianth'.
'we all know 1 hextillianth of a percent is infinitly more than 0 right?'
Well, fuck no we do not know that. it is a tiny bit more than o, not the letter 0
I did not understan one bit of this. Is it me being stupid or is it the argument?
Wheren't we talking about 3 percent, not 97?
What the heck is a hextillianth. The only Google hits on the world was this particular post. Hexa has something to do with six. But the figure six was not mentioned before in the post, where did it come from all of a sudden?
What has anything in the post to do with evolution? You ought to go back to school and learn some argumenting techniques. You probably have to start with basic english and math.
No, YOU did not devise that little "trick"
There isn't such a thing as "a little trick" that will refute evolution. What you really need is a plausible alternative, and actual physical evidence for that alternative.
I'm not holding my breath.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
